You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@couchdb.apache.org by "Nick Vatamaniuc (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/08/03 02:41:20 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (COUCHDB-2954) Deprecate configurable _replicator db name in 2.0

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Nick Vatamaniuc resolved COUCHDB-2954.
--------------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

> Deprecate configurable _replicator db name in 2.0
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-2954
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2954
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Nick Vatamaniuc
>
> CouchDB 1.x has a configurable replicator database name. 
> CouchDB 2.x uses another pattern for having custom replicator databases -- it scans files in local database data directory for patterns matching {code} "_replicator(\\.[0-9]{10,})?.couch$" {code}. So for example, can create a database called {{"joe/_replicator"}} and it will be considered a replicator database by the replication management code. This way can even have multiple replicator databases ( {{"mike/_replicator"}}, or {{"joe/other/_replicator"}} ), so configuration is even more flexible than it was in 1.x.
> Current code in couch_replicator_manager.erl is a mix of using the 1.x config option and scanning recursively for db files with _replicator pattern. It already also assumes a hard-coded "_replicator" name in a few places:
> https://github.com/apache/couchdb-couch-replicator/blob/master/src/couch_replicator_manager.erl#L918
> The proposal it to deprecate _replicator db name configuration in order to simplify and clean up the the code.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)