You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> on 2010/04/23 20:45:40 UTC
[VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1
release
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the
newly created bundles components.
This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have
been converted into OSGi jars.
This is a single vote for all of the converted dependencies required for
the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release.
A note on the bundle version numbers. The numbering scheme uses the
version number from the original component jar, with a Geronimo version
number added using a "_n" suffix (all of these are the "_1" version).
The Derby version, 10.5.3.0_1_1 is not a type. This is the wrappering
based on the 10.5.3.0_1 version of Derby.
The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run against of the projects. All
tag svn versions have been
successfully built.
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-016/
All source repos are relative to location
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/bundles/tags
and have the same final element as the artifact name.
I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
server rejected my
original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
email. I apologize for the incovenience.
The following components are being voted on
bundles-parent-1.0 (this is just the parent pom for all of the bundle
components)
aspectjrt-1.6.2_1
aspectjweaver-1.6.2_1
axis-1.4_1
backport-util-concurrent-2.2_1
castor-1.0.5_1
commons-digester-1.8_1
commons-discovery-0.4_1
derby-all-10.5.3.0_1_1
dwr-3.0.M1_1
httpcore-4.0.1_1
jaxb-impl-2.2_1
jstl-1.2_1
scannotation-1.0.2_1
sxc-jaxb-0.7.2_1
sxc-runtime-0.7.2_1
wadi-aop-2.1.2_1
wadi-core-2.1.2_1
wadi-group-2.1.2_1
wadi-tribes-2.1.2_1
woden-impl-dom-1.0M8_1
woodstox-3.2.9_1
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1
release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
+1 after jaxb and jstl being removed from the vote.
-Donald
On 4/27/10 10:51 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> +1 (with jaxb-impl excluded from the vote)
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 4/27/10 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>> On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the
>>>>> licensing information properly. Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have
>>>>> svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't
>>>>> define the file type in our recommended client configuration --
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html.
>>>>> We might want to consider updating...
>>>>>
>>>>> A few questions:
>>>>>
>>>>> * jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed
>>>>> (CDDL/GPL)?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The only license I've found for this is CDDL.
>>>>
>>> This URL seems to indicate that JAXB is dual licensed --
>>> https://jaxb.dev.java.net/2.2/
>>>
>>> If so, we should include the full license text and make sure we
>>> indicate our license choice (CDDL). Some versions of the dual license
>>> include instructions on how to apply to a work. Don't see any reason
>>> not to use the same wording...
>>>
>> I just discovered something very useful to know. You can delete
>> directories from a Nexus staging repository after the item has been
>> closed. I've removed the jaxb-impl from the staging area, and will
>> rollback just the release of that single item and stage a new vote for
>> just jaxb-impl. This vote will now be for all of the bundles except for
>> jaxb-impl, which will allow this to proceed without cancelling the
>> entire vote.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>> * jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains
>>>>> both LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed
>>>>> in the jar?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, the LICENSE.txt file came from the original jar.
>>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> --kevan
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1
release
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
+1 (with jaxb-impl excluded from the vote)
-Donald
On 4/27/10 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the
>>>> licensing information properly. Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have
>>>> svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't
>>>> define the file type in our recommended client configuration --
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html.
>>>> We might want to consider updating...
>>>>
>>>> A few questions:
>>>>
>>>> * jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed
>>>> (CDDL/GPL)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The only license I've found for this is CDDL.
>>>
>> This URL seems to indicate that JAXB is dual licensed --
>> https://jaxb.dev.java.net/2.2/
>>
>> If so, we should include the full license text and make sure we
>> indicate our license choice (CDDL). Some versions of the dual license
>> include instructions on how to apply to a work. Don't see any reason
>> not to use the same wording...
>>
> I just discovered something very useful to know. You can delete
> directories from a Nexus staging repository after the item has been
> closed. I've removed the jaxb-impl from the staging area, and will
> rollback just the release of that single item and stage a new vote for
> just jaxb-impl. This vote will now be for all of the bundles except for
> jaxb-impl, which will allow this to proceed without cancelling the
> entire vote.
>
> Rick
>
>
>>>
>>>> * jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains
>>>> both LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed
>>>> in the jar?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Yes, the LICENSE.txt file came from the original jar.
>>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1
release
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
And my obligatory forgotten +1 too.
On 4/27/2010 12:06 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>
>> On 4/27/2010 11:09 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing information properly. Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't define the file type in our recommended client configuration -- https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html. We might want to consider updating...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A few questions:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed (CDDL/GPL)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only license I've found for this is CDDL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> This URL seems to indicate that JAXB is dual licensed -- https://jaxb.dev.java.net/2.2/
>>>>>
>>>>> If so, we should include the full license text and make sure we indicate our license choice (CDDL). Some versions of the dual license include instructions on how to apply to a work. Don't see any reason not to use the same wording...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I just discovered something very useful to know. You can delete directories from a Nexus staging repository after the item has been closed. I've removed the jaxb-impl from the staging area, and will rollback just the release of that single item and stage a new vote for just jaxb-impl. This vote will now be for all of the bundles except for jaxb-impl, which will allow this to proceed without cancelling the entire vote.
>>>>
>>>> Rick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains both LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed in the jar?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> I'm ok with the rollback of jaxb-impl -- as long as it's clear what people are/have voted for.
>>>
>>> JSTL has a CDDL license, also. Is it CDDL-only or dual licensed, also?
>>>
>>>
>> Rats, that's a dual license also. I'll remove that one from the vote also and restage separately.
>>
> Thanks Rick. So, with the exclusions of jaxb and jstl, I'm +1 for the remaining bundles.
>
> --kevan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 27, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/27/2010 11:09 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing information properly. Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't define the file type in our recommended client configuration -- https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html. We might want to consider updating...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A few questions:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed (CDDL/GPL)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> The only license I've found for this is CDDL.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> This URL seems to indicate that JAXB is dual licensed -- https://jaxb.dev.java.net/2.2/
>>>>
>>>> If so, we should include the full license text and make sure we indicate our license choice (CDDL). Some versions of the dual license include instructions on how to apply to a work. Don't see any reason not to use the same wording...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I just discovered something very useful to know. You can delete directories from a Nexus staging repository after the item has been closed. I've removed the jaxb-impl from the staging area, and will rollback just the release of that single item and stage a new vote for just jaxb-impl. This vote will now be for all of the bundles except for jaxb-impl, which will allow this to proceed without cancelling the entire vote.
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> * jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains both LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed in the jar?
>>>>>>
>> I'm ok with the rollback of jaxb-impl -- as long as it's clear what people are/have voted for.
>>
>> JSTL has a CDDL license, also. Is it CDDL-only or dual licensed, also?
>>
> Rats, that's a dual license also. I'll remove that one from the vote also and restage separately.
Thanks Rick. So, with the exclusions of jaxb and jstl, I'm +1 for the remaining bundles.
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1
release
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
On 4/27/2010 11:09 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>
>> On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing information properly. Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't define the file type in our recommended client configuration -- https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html. We might want to consider updating...
>>>>>
>>>>> A few questions:
>>>>>
>>>>> * jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed (CDDL/GPL)?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The only license I've found for this is CDDL.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This URL seems to indicate that JAXB is dual licensed -- https://jaxb.dev.java.net/2.2/
>>>
>>> If so, we should include the full license text and make sure we indicate our license choice (CDDL). Some versions of the dual license include instructions on how to apply to a work. Don't see any reason not to use the same wording...
>>>
>>>
>> I just discovered something very useful to know. You can delete directories from a Nexus staging repository after the item has been closed. I've removed the jaxb-impl from the staging area, and will rollback just the release of that single item and stage a new vote for just jaxb-impl. This vote will now be for all of the bundles except for jaxb-impl, which will allow this to proceed without cancelling the entire vote.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> * jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains both LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed in the jar?
>>>>>
> I'm ok with the rollback of jaxb-impl -- as long as it's clear what people are/have voted for.
>
> JSTL has a CDDL license, also. Is it CDDL-only or dual licensed, also?
>
Rats, that's a dual license also. I'll remove that one from the vote
also and restage separately.
Rick
> --kevan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing information properly. Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't define the file type in our recommended client configuration -- https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html. We might want to consider updating...
>>>>
>>>> A few questions:
>>>>
>>>> * jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed (CDDL/GPL)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The only license I've found for this is CDDL.
>>>
>> This URL seems to indicate that JAXB is dual licensed -- https://jaxb.dev.java.net/2.2/
>>
>> If so, we should include the full license text and make sure we indicate our license choice (CDDL). Some versions of the dual license include instructions on how to apply to a work. Don't see any reason not to use the same wording...
>>
> I just discovered something very useful to know. You can delete directories from a Nexus staging repository after the item has been closed. I've removed the jaxb-impl from the staging area, and will rollback just the release of that single item and stage a new vote for just jaxb-impl. This vote will now be for all of the bundles except for jaxb-impl, which will allow this to proceed without cancelling the entire vote.
>
> Rick
>
>
>>>
>>>> * jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains both LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed in the jar?
I'm ok with the rollback of jaxb-impl -- as long as it's clear what people are/have voted for.
JSTL has a CDDL license, also. Is it CDDL-only or dual licensed, also?
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1
release
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>
>> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>>> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing information properly. Thanks!
>>>
>>> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't define the file type in our recommended client configuration -- https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html. We might want to consider updating...
>>>
>>> A few questions:
>>>
>>> * jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed (CDDL/GPL)?
>>>
>>>
>> The only license I've found for this is CDDL.
>>
> This URL seems to indicate that JAXB is dual licensed -- https://jaxb.dev.java.net/2.2/
>
> If so, we should include the full license text and make sure we indicate our license choice (CDDL). Some versions of the dual license include instructions on how to apply to a work. Don't see any reason not to use the same wording...
>
I just discovered something very useful to know. You can delete
directories from a Nexus staging repository after the item has been
closed. I've removed the jaxb-impl from the staging area, and will
rollback just the release of that single item and stage a new vote for
just jaxb-impl. This vote will now be for all of the bundles except for
jaxb-impl, which will allow this to proceed without cancelling the
entire vote.
Rick
>>
>>> * jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains both LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed in the jar?
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, the LICENSE.txt file came from the original jar.
>>
> Thanks.
>
> --kevan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1
release
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>
>> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>>> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing information properly. Thanks!
>>>
>>> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't define the file type in our recommended client configuration -- https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html. We might want to consider updating...
>>>
>>> A few questions:
>>>
>>> * jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed (CDDL/GPL)?
>>>
>>>
>> The only license I've found for this is CDDL.
>>
> This URL seems to indicate that JAXB is dual licensed -- https://jaxb.dev.java.net/2.2/
>
> If so, we should include the full license text and make sure we indicate our license choice (CDDL). Some versions of the dual license include instructions on how to apply to a work. Don't see any reason not to use the same wording...
>
Can you give me a list of the specific changes I need to make to this?
I'm not sure I understand the appropriate mechanism for indicating our
license choice.
Rick
>
>>
>>> * jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains both LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed in the jar?
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, the LICENSE.txt file came from the original jar.
>>
> Thanks.
>
> --kevan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing information properly. Thanks!
>>
>> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't define the file type in our recommended client configuration -- https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html. We might want to consider updating...
>>
>> A few questions:
>>
>> * jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed (CDDL/GPL)?
>>
> The only license I've found for this is CDDL.
This URL seems to indicate that JAXB is dual licensed -- https://jaxb.dev.java.net/2.2/
If so, we should include the full license text and make sure we indicate our license choice (CDDL). Some versions of the dual license include instructions on how to apply to a work. Don't see any reason not to use the same wording...
>
>> * jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains both LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed in the jar?
>>
> Yes, the LICENSE.txt file came from the original jar.
Thanks.
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1
release
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing information properly. Thanks!
>
> One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't define the file type in our recommended client configuration -- https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html. We might want to consider updating...
>
> A few questions:
>
> * jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed (CDDL/GPL)?
>
The only license I've found for this is CDDL.
> * jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains both LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed in the jar?
>
Yes, the LICENSE.txt file came from the original jar.
Rick
> --kevan
>
> On Apr 23, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>
>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the newly created bundles components.
>> This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have been converted into OSGi jars.
>> This is a single vote for all of the converted dependencies required for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release.
>>
>> A note on the bundle version numbers. The numbering scheme uses the version number from the original component jar, with a Geronimo version number added using a "_n" suffix (all of these are the "_1" version). The Derby version, 10.5.3.0_1_1 is not a type. This is the wrappering based on the 10.5.3.0_1 version of Derby.
>>
>> The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run against of the projects. All tag svn versions have been
>> successfully built.
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
>> Staging repo:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-016/
>>
>> All source repos are relative to location
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/bundles/tags
>>
>> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>>
>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list server rejected my
>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>>
>> The following components are being voted on
>>
>> bundles-parent-1.0 (this is just the parent pom for all of the bundle components)
>>
>> aspectjrt-1.6.2_1
>> aspectjweaver-1.6.2_1
>> axis-1.4_1
>> backport-util-concurrent-2.2_1
>> castor-1.0.5_1
>> commons-digester-1.8_1
>> commons-discovery-0.4_1
>> derby-all-10.5.3.0_1_1
>> dwr-3.0.M1_1
>> httpcore-4.0.1_1
>> jaxb-impl-2.2_1
>> jstl-1.2_1
>> scannotation-1.0.2_1
>> sxc-jaxb-0.7.2_1
>> sxc-runtime-0.7.2_1
>> wadi-aop-2.1.2_1
>> wadi-core-2.1.2_1
>> wadi-group-2.1.2_1
>> wadi-tribes-2.1.2_1
>> woden-impl-dom-1.0M8_1
>> woodstox-3.2.9_1
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing information properly. Thanks!
One minor comment -- I notice that some of the new files do not have svn:eol-style=native (i.e. LICENSE.vm). Probably because we don't define the file type in our recommended client configuration -- https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/subversion-client-configuration.html. We might want to consider updating...
A few questions:
* jaxb-impl-2.2_1 -- is this CDDL licensed? or dual-licensed (CDDL/GPL)?
* jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains both LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed in the jar?
--kevan
On Apr 23, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the newly created bundles components.
> This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have been converted into OSGi jars.
> This is a single vote for all of the converted dependencies required for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release.
>
> A note on the bundle version numbers. The numbering scheme uses the version number from the original component jar, with a Geronimo version number added using a "_n" suffix (all of these are the "_1" version). The Derby version, 10.5.3.0_1_1 is not a type. This is the wrappering based on the 10.5.3.0_1 version of Derby.
>
> The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run against of the projects. All tag svn versions have been
> successfully built.
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-016/
>
> All source repos are relative to location
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/bundles/tags
>
> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>
> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list server rejected my
> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>
> The following components are being voted on
>
> bundles-parent-1.0 (this is just the parent pom for all of the bundle components)
>
> aspectjrt-1.6.2_1
> aspectjweaver-1.6.2_1
> axis-1.4_1
> backport-util-concurrent-2.2_1
> castor-1.0.5_1
> commons-digester-1.8_1
> commons-discovery-0.4_1
> derby-all-10.5.3.0_1_1
> dwr-3.0.M1_1
> httpcore-4.0.1_1
> jaxb-impl-2.2_1
> jstl-1.2_1
> scannotation-1.0.2_1
> sxc-jaxb-0.7.2_1
> sxc-runtime-0.7.2_1
> wadi-aop-2.1.2_1
> wadi-core-2.1.2_1
> wadi-group-2.1.2_1
> wadi-tribes-2.1.2_1
> woden-impl-dom-1.0M8_1
> woodstox-3.2.9_1
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo
3.0-M1 release
Posted by Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>.
Rick,
-1. Sorry about this but looks like all these artifacts have SNAPSHOT
dependency on the bundles-parent:
<parent>
<groupId>org.apache.geronimo.bundles</groupId>
<artifactId>bundles-parent</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</parent>
Jarek
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the
> newly created bundles components.
> This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have
> been converted into OSGi jars.
> This is a single vote for all of the converted dependencies required for the
> Geronimo 3.0-M1 release.
>
> A note on the bundle version numbers. The numbering scheme uses the version
> number from the original component jar, with a Geronimo version number added
> using a "_n" suffix (all of these are the "_1" version). The Derby version,
> 10.5.3.0_1_1 is not a type. This is the wrappering based on the 10.5.3.0_1
> version of Derby.
>
> The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run against of the projects. All tag
> svn versions have been
> successfully built.
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-016/
>
> All source repos are relative to location
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/bundles/tags
>
> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>
> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list server
> rejected my
> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the email. I
> apologize for the incovenience.
>
> The following components are being voted on
>
> bundles-parent-1.0 (this is just the parent pom for all of the bundle
> components)
>
> aspectjrt-1.6.2_1
> aspectjweaver-1.6.2_1
> axis-1.4_1
> backport-util-concurrent-2.2_1
> castor-1.0.5_1
> commons-digester-1.8_1
> commons-discovery-0.4_1
> derby-all-10.5.3.0_1_1
> dwr-3.0.M1_1
> httpcore-4.0.1_1
> jaxb-impl-2.2_1
> jstl-1.2_1
> scannotation-1.0.2_1
> sxc-jaxb-0.7.2_1
> sxc-runtime-0.7.2_1
> wadi-aop-2.1.2_1
> wadi-core-2.1.2_1
> wadi-group-2.1.2_1
> wadi-tribes-2.1.2_1
> woden-impl-dom-1.0M8_1
> woodstox-3.2.9_1
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1
release -- mostly CANCELLED
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
A glitch in the maven release plugin has caused each all of the
compoents except for the bundles-parent to have a snapshot dependency
for the parent POM. This issue will be easier to deal with if the
bundles-parent is promoted to central first. Since that is the only
component that did not have the problem, and there are no -1 votes on
that one element, it will be released. The votes for the following
components will be cancelled and reattempted:
aspectjrt-1.6.2_1
aspectjweaver-1.6.2_1
axis-1.4_1
backport-util-concurrent-2.2_1
castor-1.0.5_1
commons-digester-1.8_1
commons-discovery-0.4_1
derby-all-10.5.3.0_1_1
dwr-3.0.M1_1
httpcore-4.0.1_1
jaxb-impl-2.2_1
jstl-1.2_1
scannotation-1.0.2_1
sxc-jaxb-0.7.2_1
sxc-runtime-0.7.2_1
wadi-aop-2.1.2_1
wadi-core-2.1.2_1
wadi-group-2.1.2_1
wadi-tribes-2.1.2_1
woden-impl-dom-1.0M8_1
woodstox-3.2.9_1
Rick
On 4/23/2010 2:45 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
> the newly created bundles components.
> This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that
> have been converted into OSGi jars.
> This is a single vote for all of the converted dependencies required
> for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release.
>
> A note on the bundle version numbers. The numbering scheme uses the
> version number from the original component jar, with a Geronimo
> version number added using a "_n" suffix (all of these are the "_1"
> version). The Derby version, 10.5.3.0_1_1 is not a type. This is the
> wrappering based on the 10.5.3.0_1 version of Derby.
>
> The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run against of the projects. All
> tag svn versions have been
> successfully built.
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-016/
>
> All source repos are relative to location
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/bundles/tags
>
> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>
> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
> server rejected my
> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
> email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>
> The following components are being voted on
>
> bundles-parent-1.0 (this is just the parent pom for all of the bundle
> components)
>
> aspectjrt-1.6.2_1
> aspectjweaver-1.6.2_1
> axis-1.4_1
> backport-util-concurrent-2.2_1
> castor-1.0.5_1
> commons-digester-1.8_1
> commons-discovery-0.4_1
> derby-all-10.5.3.0_1_1
> dwr-3.0.M1_1
> httpcore-4.0.1_1
> jaxb-impl-2.2_1
> jstl-1.2_1
> scannotation-1.0.2_1
> sxc-jaxb-0.7.2_1
> sxc-runtime-0.7.2_1
> wadi-aop-2.1.2_1
> wadi-core-2.1.2_1
> wadi-group-2.1.2_1
> wadi-tribes-2.1.2_1
> woden-impl-dom-1.0M8_1
> woodstox-3.2.9_1
>