[id] Review before 1.0

[Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>]

Hi folks,

finalizing c-id 1.0 I detected, that to avoid a dependency to c-codec, some
classes have been copied to c-id. While this is a common task to decouple
commons components, these copied classes are now all public available in
the package o.a.c.id ... IMHO we normally don't put them into public
space ... ??

- Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: [id] Review before 1.0

[Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>]

Maybe refactor the package to be named internal so o.a.c.id.internal ?
And add a package.html that it is should not be used directly ?

Mvgr,
Martin

Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> finalizing c-id 1.0 I detected, that to avoid a dependency to c-codec, some
> classes have been copied to c-id. While this is a common task to decouple
> commons components, these copied classes are now all public available in
> the package o.a.c.id ... IMHO we normally don't put them into public
> space ... ??
> 
> - Jörg
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org