You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@trafficserver.apache.org by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> on 2013/03/10 00:26:51 UTC
[VOTE] Release v3.3.1
Hi all,
I've prepared a release for v3.3.1, which has quite a few improvements and
bug fixes over 3.3.0. Please see the CHANGES for more details.
The artifacts are available at http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/rel-candidates/:
-rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 2769725 Mar 9 19:45
trafficserver-3.3.1-dev.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 836 Mar 9 19:45
trafficserver-3.3.1-dev.tar.bz2.asc
-rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 66 Mar 9 19:45
trafficserver-3.3.1-dev.tar.bz2.md5
-rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 74 Mar 9 19:45
trafficserver-3.3.1-dev.tar.bz2.sha1
MD5: 4c5b80a123ee5d4e78a18903e50c4582
SHA1: 0de521d3442934743537731ef7a6b12ac1e631de
The goal is to release this on March 12th, so please cast your +, - or 0
votes asap.
Cheers,
-- leif
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release v3.3.1
Posted by John Plevyak <jp...@gmail.com>.
Works fine for me on a smoke test +1
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> This vote (barely!!) passes with 3 +1 votes.
>
> Seriously, we have a real problem if the PMC isn't voting on our release
> candidates. Do we need to extend the release process to 7 days? Obviously a
> different thread/discussion, but we might have to consider that.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Leif
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release v3.3.1
Posted by John Plevyak <jp...@gmail.com>.
Works fine for me on a smoke test +1
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> This vote (barely!!) passes with 3 +1 votes.
>
> Seriously, we have a real problem if the PMC isn't voting on our release
> candidates. Do we need to extend the release process to 7 days? Obviously a
> different thread/discussion, but we might have to consider that.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Leif
>
>
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release v3.3.1
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
This vote (barely!!) passes with 3 +1 votes.
Seriously, we have a real problem if the PMC isn't voting on our release
candidates. Do we need to extend the release process to 7 days?
Obviously a different thread/discussion, but we might have to consider that.
Cheers,
-- Leif
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release v3.3.1
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
This vote (barely!!) passes with 3 +1 votes.
Seriously, we have a real problem if the PMC isn't voting on our release
candidates. Do we need to extend the release process to 7 days?
Obviously a different thread/discussion, but we might have to consider that.
Cheers,
-- Leif
Re: [VOTE] Release v3.3.1
Posted by James Peach <ja...@me.com>.
On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've prepared a release for v3.3.1, which has quite a few improvements and bug fixes over 3.3.0. Please see the CHANGES for more details.
>
> The artifacts are available at http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/rel-candidates/:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 2769725 Mar 9 19:45 trafficserver-3.3.1-dev.tar.bz2
> -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 836 Mar 9 19:45 trafficserver-3.3.1-dev.tar.bz2.asc
> -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 66 Mar 9 19:45 trafficserver-3.3.1-dev.tar.bz2.md5
> -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 74 Mar 9 19:45 trafficserver-3.3.1-dev.tar.bz2.sha1
>
> MD5: 4c5b80a123ee5d4e78a18903e50c4582
> SHA1: 0de521d3442934743537731ef7a6b12ac1e631de
>
> The goal is to release this on March 12th, so please cast your +, - or 0 votes asap.
+1
Re: [VOTE] Release v3.3.1
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On 3/10/13 10:08 PM, Alan M. Carroll wrote:
> I am running trunk, which I think is currently identical to 3.3.1 and it crashes on the first request. FC 18, forward full transparent, null transform enabled. It seems to work without the null transform, though. The error is at P_ProtectionQueue.h:90 with a failed assert. Running in the debugger gives varying results about whether the value in the assert is actually wrong, which suggests a race condition.
Did you test 3.3.1, or did you run trunk with the latest changes from Bryan?
Everyone else, if we don't get votes by tomorrow, the release will fail.
-- Leif
Re: [VOTE] Release v3.3.1
Posted by "Alan M. Carroll" <am...@network-geographics.com>.
I am running trunk, which I think is currently identical to 3.3.1 and it crashes on the first request. FC 18, forward full transparent, null transform enabled. It seems to work without the null transform, though. The error is at P_ProtectionQueue.h:90 with a failed assert. Running in the debugger gives varying results about whether the value in the assert is actually wrong, which suggests a race condition.
Compile with DEBUG and WCCP enabled. To reproduce I set for forward transparent, enable the null transform, and then make a request for a ~17M file. It generally fails within the first 1M or so.
I'll look some more tomorrow.
Re: [VOTE] Release v3.3.1
Posted by Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org>.
Leif,
I haven't had time to test yet -
would you mind extending the vote?
-- i
----- Original Message -----
> Saturday, March 9, 2013, 10:35:30 PM, you wrote:
>
> > On 3/9/13 4:26 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> >> Hi all,
>
> >> I've prepared a release for v3.3.1, which has quite a few
> >> improvements and
> >> bug fixes over 3.3.0. Please see the CHANGES for more details.
>
> >> The artifacts are available at
> >> http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/rel-candidates/:
>
>
> +1 from me, it works in my test scenarios.
>
>
--
Igor Galić
Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE
Re: [VOTE] Release v3.3.1
Posted by "Alan M. Carroll" <am...@network-geographics.com>.
Saturday, March 9, 2013, 10:35:30 PM, you wrote:
> On 3/9/13 4:26 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I've prepared a release for v3.3.1, which has quite a few improvements and
>> bug fixes over 3.3.0. Please see the CHANGES for more details.
>> The artifacts are available at
>> http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/rel-candidates/:
+1 from me, it works in my test scenarios.
Re: [VOTE] Release v3.3.1
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On 3/9/13 4:26 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've prepared a release for v3.3.1, which has quite a few improvements and
> bug fixes over 3.3.0. Please see the CHANGES for more details.
>
> The artifacts are available at
> http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/rel-candidates/:
+1 from me, tested (build + regressions + basic proxy / caching) on
Fedora Core 18 (64-bit)
Ubuntu 10.10 (64-bit)
CentOS 5 (64-bit)
Fedora Rawhide (64-bit) [gcc v4.8]
FreeBSD 8.2 (32-bit)
OmniOS (32-bit)
Debian 6 (64-bit)
Ubuntu 11.10 (64-bit)
Fedora Core 16 (64-bit)
CentOS 6 (64-bit)
OSX 10.8 / Clang
-- Leif
P.s
Note that on FBSD, we still fail one regression:
[SDK_API_TSTextLog] TSTextLogObjectWrite : [TestCase1] <<FAIL>> { can not
write to log object }
REGRESSION_RESULT SDK_API_TSTextLog: FAILED
I'm guessing a permissions problem or something?
Re: [VOTE] Release v3.3.1
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On 3/9/13 4:26 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've prepared a release for v3.3.1, which has quite a few improvements and
> bug fixes over 3.3.0. Please see the CHANGES for more details.
>
> The artifacts are available at
> http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/rel-candidates/:
+1 from me, tested (build + regressions + basic proxy / caching) on
Fedora Core 18 (64-bit)
Ubuntu 10.10 (64-bit)
CentOS 5 (64-bit)
Fedora Rawhide (64-bit) [gcc v4.8]
FreeBSD 8.2 (32-bit)
OmniOS (32-bit)
Debian 6 (64-bit)
Ubuntu 11.10 (64-bit)
Fedora Core 16 (64-bit)
CentOS 6 (64-bit)
OSX 10.8 / Clang
-- Leif
P.s
Note that on FBSD, we still fail one regression:
[SDK_API_TSTextLog] TSTextLogObjectWrite : [TestCase1] <<FAIL>> { can not
write to log object }
REGRESSION_RESULT SDK_API_TSTextLog: FAILED
I'm guessing a permissions problem or something?