You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2007/07/14 16:18:30 UTC
MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Should we do it now ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 on the 1.2 being trunk
Will we branch tomahawk and sandbox and make its trunk on the lines of
1.2 versioning and have the new trunk require JSF 1.2 and thus JDK
1.5? I'd be all for that. It would be nice to move off of the 1.4
restrictions.
On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > So I think the real issue is more with the current JSF 1.1 users. It might
> > be rude to switch to JSF 1.2 so fast after the first release, but I wonder
> > if there's "good time" at all for this kind of action. Personally, I don't
> > see any so I think the sooner the better as less harm will be done.
>
> there will be releases like 1.1.6 as well.
> so, just "switching", was the idea of our discussions in the past, not
> stopping myfaces 1.1.x.
> I am -1 on that ;-)
>
> -Matthias
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > ~ Simon
> >
> >
> > On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Well,
> > >
> > > we were talking about this in past, and in the past (14 month ago or
> > > so), we agreed to keep
> > > MyFaces 1.1.x to be the trunk. Now, we have a (first) release of
> > > MyFaces 1.2.x out there, so it
> > > *might* make more sense now, than in the past. However, we recently
> > > asked, but we never heard much back for others (7 "votes"). Therefore
> > > an "official" vote was needed.
> > >
> > > Glad you jumped in.
> > >
> > > It's not that we need to "push" this, now. I am personally fine in
> > > switching to 1.2.x (on trunk) later.
> > > Looks like we need to discuss this, in more details.
> > >
> > > Perhaps it's good to wait, and try to get a *first* step into a
> > > version of Tomahawk/Tobago that are JSF-1.2-style .
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > > On 7/19/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Got a question here: making the JSF 1.2 core
> > > > trunk seems like a no-brainer. But what about Tomahawk
> > > > and Trinidad? Will those switch over to be JSF 1.2-based
> > > > on their trunks, or should we keep JSF 1.1 as the basis
> > > > for their trunks?
> > > >
> > > > The coder in me wants to bump to JSF 1.2, but it's
> > > > hard to imagine that the community in general is ready.
> > > > WDYT?
> > > >
> > > > -- Adam
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > yeah, I'll do that now :)
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess, this topic also become more attention, when it's a vote ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > -M
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/19/07, Paul McMahan < paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Jul 19, 2007, at 4:24 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'd prefer a vote, to be honest. Yeah, we become vote-happy :-)))
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Votes are cheap :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best wishes,
> > > > > > Paul
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Simon Lessard <si...@gmail.com>.
Of course, MyFaces is a spec implementation so bugs need to be fixed in
order to remain competitive with other providers. What I meant is more
perception-wise. Assuming someone started using MyFaces 1.1.x like one month
ago or so and downloaded the source from SVN, he might feel left out seeing
it being moved to a branche.
The issue is probably going to be bigger with Trinidad/Tomahawk/Tobago
though since they are custom component libraries and is thus free to provide
more "new features". Duplicating the new code is going to work for a while,
but I don't know for how long it should be desirable. Moving new features
from 1.1 to 1.2 will always be possible, but the opposite won't, especially
with the invokeOnComponent feature. It's a potential maintenance nightmare.
Maybe we'll have to stop adding new features to the 1.1 version at some
point? Anyway, that's another issue completely since we are talking about
MyFaces for now.
Regards,
~ Simon
On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > So I think the real issue is more with the current JSF 1.1 users. It
> might
> > be rude to switch to JSF 1.2 so fast after the first release, but I
> wonder
> > if there's "good time" at all for this kind of action. Personally, I
> don't
> > see any so I think the sooner the better as less harm will be done.
>
> there will be releases like 1.1.6 as well.
> so, just "switching", was the idea of our discussions in the past, not
> stopping myfaces 1.1.x.
> I am -1 on that ;-)
>
> -Matthias
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > ~ Simon
> >
> >
> > On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Well,
> > >
> > > we were talking about this in past, and in the past (14 month ago or
> > > so), we agreed to keep
> > > MyFaces 1.1.x to be the trunk. Now, we have a (first) release of
> > > MyFaces 1.2.x out there, so it
> > > *might* make more sense now, than in the past. However, we recently
> > > asked, but we never heard much back for others (7 "votes"). Therefore
> > > an "official" vote was needed.
> > >
> > > Glad you jumped in.
> > >
> > > It's not that we need to "push" this, now. I am personally fine in
> > > switching to 1.2.x (on trunk) later.
> > > Looks like we need to discuss this, in more details.
> > >
> > > Perhaps it's good to wait, and try to get a *first* step into a
> > > version of Tomahawk/Tobago that are JSF-1.2-style .
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > > On 7/19/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Got a question here: making the JSF 1.2 core
> > > > trunk seems like a no-brainer. But what about Tomahawk
> > > > and Trinidad? Will those switch over to be JSF 1.2-based
> > > > on their trunks, or should we keep JSF 1.1 as the basis
> > > > for their trunks?
> > > >
> > > > The coder in me wants to bump to JSF 1.2, but it's
> > > > hard to imagine that the community in general is ready.
> > > > WDYT?
> > > >
> > > > -- Adam
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > yeah, I'll do that now :)
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess, this topic also become more attention, when it's a
> vote ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > -M
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/19/07, Paul McMahan < paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Jul 19, 2007, at 4:24 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'd prefer a vote, to be honest. Yeah, we become vote-happy
> :-)))
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Votes are cheap :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best wishes,
> > > > > > Paul
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
> So I think the real issue is more with the current JSF 1.1 users. It might
> be rude to switch to JSF 1.2 so fast after the first release, but I wonder
> if there's "good time" at all for this kind of action. Personally, I don't
> see any so I think the sooner the better as less harm will be done.
there will be releases like 1.1.6 as well.
so, just "switching", was the idea of our discussions in the past, not
stopping myfaces 1.1.x.
I am -1 on that ;-)
-Matthias
> Regards,
>
> ~ Simon
>
>
> On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Well,
> >
> > we were talking about this in past, and in the past (14 month ago or
> > so), we agreed to keep
> > MyFaces 1.1.x to be the trunk. Now, we have a (first) release of
> > MyFaces 1.2.x out there, so it
> > *might* make more sense now, than in the past. However, we recently
> > asked, but we never heard much back for others (7 "votes"). Therefore
> > an "official" vote was needed.
> >
> > Glad you jumped in.
> >
> > It's not that we need to "push" this, now. I am personally fine in
> > switching to 1.2.x (on trunk) later.
> > Looks like we need to discuss this, in more details.
> >
> > Perhaps it's good to wait, and try to get a *first* step into a
> > version of Tomahawk/Tobago that are JSF-1.2-style .
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On 7/19/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Got a question here: making the JSF 1.2 core
> > > trunk seems like a no-brainer. But what about Tomahawk
> > > and Trinidad? Will those switch over to be JSF 1.2-based
> > > on their trunks, or should we keep JSF 1.1 as the basis
> > > for their trunks?
> > >
> > > The coder in me wants to bump to JSF 1.2, but it's
> > > hard to imagine that the community in general is ready.
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > > -- Adam
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > yeah, I'll do that now :)
> > > >
> > > > I guess, this topic also become more attention, when it's a vote ;)
> > > >
> > > > -M
> > > >
> > > > On 7/19/07, Paul McMahan < paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Jul 19, 2007, at 4:24 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'd prefer a vote, to be honest. Yeah, we become vote-happy :-)))
> > > > >
> > > > > Votes are cheap :-)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best wishes,
> > > > > Paul
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Simon Lessard <si...@gmail.com>.
I would rather switch to 1.2 now so that new users use 1.2 right away.
In a sense it's going to be better for them since they won't have a
conversion cost later. I'm currently converting an application to JSF
1.2and it's not as easy as dropping new libs in if you don't want to
have any
deprecated usage warnings left in the converted project. Furthermore
JSF 1.2is the version that's part of JEE 5, not JSF
1.1.
So I think the real issue is more with the current JSF 1.1 users. It might
be rude to switch to JSF 1.2 so fast after the first release, but I wonder
if there's "good time" at all for this kind of action. Personally, I don't
see any so I think the sooner the better as less harm will be done.
Regards,
~ Simon
On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Well,
>
> we were talking about this in past, and in the past (14 month ago or
> so), we agreed to keep
> MyFaces 1.1.x to be the trunk. Now, we have a (first) release of
> MyFaces 1.2.x out there, so it
> *might* make more sense now, than in the past. However, we recently
> asked, but we never heard much back for others (7 "votes"). Therefore
> an "official" vote was needed.
>
> Glad you jumped in.
>
> It's not that we need to "push" this, now. I am personally fine in
> switching to 1.2.x (on trunk) later.
> Looks like we need to discuss this, in more details.
>
> Perhaps it's good to wait, and try to get a *first* step into a
> version of Tomahawk/Tobago that are JSF-1.2-style.
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 7/19/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Got a question here: making the JSF 1.2 core
> > trunk seems like a no-brainer. But what about Tomahawk
> > and Trinidad? Will those switch over to be JSF 1.2-based
> > on their trunks, or should we keep JSF 1.1 as the basis
> > for their trunks?
> >
> > The coder in me wants to bump to JSF 1.2, but it's
> > hard to imagine that the community in general is ready.
> > WDYT?
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
> >
> > On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > yeah, I'll do that now :)
> > >
> > > I guess, this topic also become more attention, when it's a vote ;)
> > >
> > > -M
> > >
> > > On 7/19/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Jul 19, 2007, at 4:24 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'd prefer a vote, to be honest. Yeah, we become vote-happy :-)))
> > > >
> > > > Votes are cheap :-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best wishes,
> > > > Paul
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Well,
we were talking about this in past, and in the past (14 month ago or
so), we agreed to keep
MyFaces 1.1.x to be the trunk. Now, we have a (first) release of
MyFaces 1.2.x out there, so it
*might* make more sense now, than in the past. However, we recently
asked, but we never heard much back for others (7 "votes"). Therefore
an "official" vote was needed.
Glad you jumped in.
It's not that we need to "push" this, now. I am personally fine in
switching to 1.2.x (on trunk) later.
Looks like we need to discuss this, in more details.
Perhaps it's good to wait, and try to get a *first* step into a
version of Tomahawk/Tobago that are JSF-1.2-style.
-Matthias
On 7/19/07, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Got a question here: making the JSF 1.2 core
> trunk seems like a no-brainer. But what about Tomahawk
> and Trinidad? Will those switch over to be JSF 1.2-based
> on their trunks, or should we keep JSF 1.1 as the basis
> for their trunks?
>
> The coder in me wants to bump to JSF 1.2, but it's
> hard to imagine that the community in general is ready.
> WDYT?
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > yeah, I'll do that now :)
> >
> > I guess, this topic also become more attention, when it's a vote ;)
> >
> > -M
> >
> > On 7/19/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Jul 19, 2007, at 4:24 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'd prefer a vote, to be honest. Yeah, we become vote-happy :-)))
> > >
> > > Votes are cheap :-)
> > >
> > >
> > > Best wishes,
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
Got a question here: making the JSF 1.2 core
trunk seems like a no-brainer. But what about Tomahawk
and Trinidad? Will those switch over to be JSF 1.2-based
on their trunks, or should we keep JSF 1.1 as the basis
for their trunks?
The coder in me wants to bump to JSF 1.2, but it's
hard to imagine that the community in general is ready.
WDYT?
-- Adam
On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> yeah, I'll do that now :)
>
> I guess, this topic also become more attention, when it's a vote ;)
>
> -M
>
> On 7/19/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jul 19, 2007, at 4:24 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >
> > > I'd prefer a vote, to be honest. Yeah, we become vote-happy :-)))
> >
> > Votes are cheap :-)
> >
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Paul
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
yeah, I'll do that now :)
I guess, this topic also become more attention, when it's a vote ;)
-M
On 7/19/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 19, 2007, at 4:24 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
> > I'd prefer a vote, to be honest. Yeah, we become vote-happy :-)))
>
> Votes are cheap :-)
>
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 19, 2007, at 4:24 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> I'd prefer a vote, to be honest. Yeah, we become vote-happy :-)))
Votes are cheap :-)
Best wishes,
Paul
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Looks like we got 7 "+1" votes, well this was not really a vote.
So, since we heard no concerns on that, should we do an "official vote" ?
Or just do it...
I'd prefer a vote, to be honest. Yeah, we become vote-happy :-)))
-Matthias
On 7/15/07, Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 7/14/07, Cagatay Civici <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/15/07, Simon Lessard < simon.lessard.3@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/14/07, Paul McMahan < paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Best wishes,
> > > > Paul
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Jul 14, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Should we do it now ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Smith
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 7/14/07, Cagatay Civici <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 7/15/07, Simon Lessard <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On 7/14/07, Paul McMahan < paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Best wishes,
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jul 14, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > >
> > > > Should we do it now ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Grant Smith
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Cagatay Civici <ca...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 7/15/07, Simon Lessard <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 7/14/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Paul
> >
> >
> > On Jul 14, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >
> > > Should we do it now ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
> >
>
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Simon Lessard <si...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 7/14/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
>
> On Jul 14, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
> > Should we do it now ?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
+1
Best wishes,
Paul
On Jul 14, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Should we do it now ?
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1
regards,
Martin
On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 as well
>
> On 7/14/07, Dennis Byrne <de...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Well, it is 2007 :)
> >
> > Dennis Byrne
> >
> >
> > On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Should we do it now ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dennis Byrne
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
+1 as well
On 7/14/07, Dennis Byrne <de...@apache.org> wrote:
> Well, it is 2007 :)
>
> Dennis Byrne
>
>
> On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Should we do it now ?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dennis Byrne
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: MyFaces 1.2.0 - trunk ?
Posted by Dennis Byrne <de...@apache.org>.
Well, it is 2007 :)
Dennis Byrne
On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Should we do it now ?
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
--
Dennis Byrne