[jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-350) Performance enhancement in FastVectorHighlighter

["Digy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12846071#action_12846071 ] 

Digy commented on LUCENENET-350:
--------------------------------

Hi Bianco,
First of all, could you add a apache licence to the file VectorHighlightMapper.cs?

Your work is very good and pass all tests, but it is not like just a simple bug fix and there is a divergence from FVH java. This makes life hard while making new versions' ports.

All Lucene.Net community!
Any idea about what  we should do?

DIGY



> Performance enhancement in FastVectorHighlighter
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-350
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-350
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Bianco Veigel
>         Attachments: FieldTermStack.patch, VectorHighlightMapper.cs
>
>
> I've had some performace issues with highlighting large documents (>25MB plain text, > 11000 Terms per Field)
> This can be usual if your indexing i.e. log or trace files.
> Most of the time is spent loading the field value and stored TermVectors and Offets and itering over this List.
> I've build a TermVectorMapper which filters this List, by the searched terms, so that the time is reduces by approx. 30%

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.