[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-1459) Unified the naming of test class

["Eric Pai (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Eric Pai reassigned IOTDB-1459:
-------------------------------

    Assignee: Eric Pai

> Unified the naming of test class
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IOTDB-1459
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1459
>             Project: Apache IoTDB
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Test
>            Reporter: sunjincheng
>            Assignee: Eric Pai
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 0.13.0
>
>
> At present, the naming of some test classes is not uniform，such as, `IT` vs `ITCase`, e.g.:
> 1. https://github.com/apache/iotdb/tree/master/server/src/test/java/org/apache/iotdb/db/integration (end with `IT`).
> 2. https://github.com/apache/iotdb/tree/master/flink-tsfile-connector/src/test/java/org/apache/iotdb/flink/tsfile  (end with `ITCase`).
> BTW: The test issue is also involved here, as follows:
> - https://github.com/apache/iotdb/blob/9bbea3deee0ad7a382fb509d905a79ce44f4208d/pom.xml#L909
> - https://github.com/apache/iotdb/blob/9bbea3deee0ad7a382fb509d905a79ce44f4208d/pom.xml#L922
> The open question is:
>  I am not pretty sure about which one is best of `Test` vs `TaseCase` and `IT` vs `ITCase` ,but we should chose one uniform naming format. 
> Refer to other communities: 
> [1] Flink(xxITCase): https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/master/flink-table/flink-table-planner-blink/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/table/planner/runtime/stream/table
> [2] Spark(xxxSuite): https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/master/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql
> For me, there are not the best one, only the most suitable, and the choice of our iotdb community.  What's your thoughts. :)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)