You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nutch.apache.org by "Doğacan Güney (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/08/08 10:22:59 UTC
[jira] Created: (NUTCH-538) Delete unused classes under o.a.n.util
Delete unused classes under o.a.n.util
--------------------------------------
Key: NUTCH-538
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-538
Project: Nutch
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Doğacan Güney
Priority: Trivial
Fix For: 1.0.0
Attachments: delete_unused.patch
ThreadPool and FibonacciHeap is not used by anything else in nutch source so, IMHO, there is no point keeping them. Java 5 has really nice alternatives to ThreadPool under java.util.concurrent. I don't know if FibonacciHeap is faster than java's priority queue but we don't make huge priority queues anyway so even if it is faster it is probably not noticable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (NUTCH-538) Delete unused classes under o.a.n.util
Posted by "Doğacan Güney (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Doğacan Güney resolved NUTCH-538.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Doğacan Güney
Committed in rev. 593261.
> Delete unused classes under o.a.n.util
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-538
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-538
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Doğacan Güney
> Assignee: Doğacan Güney
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
> Attachments: delete_unused.patch
>
>
> ThreadPool and FibonacciHeap is not used by anything else in nutch source so, IMHO, there is no point keeping them. Java 5 has really nice alternatives to ThreadPool under java.util.concurrent. I don't know if FibonacciHeap is faster than java's priority queue but we don't make huge priority queues anyway so even if it is faster it is probably not noticable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (NUTCH-538) Delete unused classes under
o.a.n.util
Posted by "Hudson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12541234 ]
Hudson commented on NUTCH-538:
------------------------------
Integrated in Nutch-Nightly #261 (See [http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Nutch-Nightly/261/])
> Delete unused classes under o.a.n.util
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-538
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-538
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Doğacan Güney
> Assignee: Doğacan Güney
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
> Attachments: delete_unused.patch
>
>
> ThreadPool and FibonacciHeap is not used by anything else in nutch source so, IMHO, there is no point keeping them. Java 5 has really nice alternatives to ThreadPool under java.util.concurrent. I don't know if FibonacciHeap is faster than java's priority queue but we don't make huge priority queues anyway so even if it is faster it is probably not noticable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (NUTCH-538) Delete unused classes under o.a.n.util
Posted by "Doğacan Güney (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Doğacan Güney updated NUTCH-538:
--------------------------------
Attachment: delete_unused.patch
Trivial patch to delete ThreadPool and FibonacciHeap.
> Delete unused classes under o.a.n.util
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-538
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-538
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Doğacan Güney
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
> Attachments: delete_unused.patch
>
>
> ThreadPool and FibonacciHeap is not used by anything else in nutch source so, IMHO, there is no point keeping them. Java 5 has really nice alternatives to ThreadPool under java.util.concurrent. I don't know if FibonacciHeap is faster than java's priority queue but we don't make huge priority queues anyway so even if it is faster it is probably not noticable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (NUTCH-538) Delete unused classes under
o.a.n.util
Posted by "Hudson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12541510 ]
Hudson commented on NUTCH-538:
------------------------------
Integrated in Nutch-Nightly #262 (See [http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Nutch-Nightly/262/])
> Delete unused classes under o.a.n.util
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-538
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-538
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Doğacan Güney
> Assignee: Doğacan Güney
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
> Attachments: delete_unused.patch
>
>
> ThreadPool and FibonacciHeap is not used by anything else in nutch source so, IMHO, there is no point keeping them. Java 5 has really nice alternatives to ThreadPool under java.util.concurrent. I don't know if FibonacciHeap is faster than java's priority queue but we don't make huge priority queues anyway so even if it is faster it is probably not noticable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (NUTCH-538) Delete unused classes under o.a.n.util
Posted by "Doğacan Güney (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Doğacan Güney closed NUTCH-538.
-------------------------------
> Delete unused classes under o.a.n.util
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-538
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-538
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Doğacan Güney
> Assignee: Doğacan Güney
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
> Attachments: delete_unused.patch
>
>
> ThreadPool and FibonacciHeap is not used by anything else in nutch source so, IMHO, there is no point keeping them. Java 5 has really nice alternatives to ThreadPool under java.util.concurrent. I don't know if FibonacciHeap is faster than java's priority queue but we don't make huge priority queues anyway so even if it is faster it is probably not noticable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.