You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Per Jessen <pe...@computer.org> on 2012/12/08 14:25:39 UTC
the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient
FYI, see $SUBJ.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (-0.7°C)
http://www.dns24.ch/ - free DNS hosting, made in Switzerland.
Re: the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient
Posted by da...@chaosreigns.com.
On 12/08, Per Jessen wrote:
> FYI, see $SUBJ.
Just noticed I opened a bug about this nearly a year and a half ago:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6632
--
"Anarchy is based on the observation that since few are fit to rule
themselves, even fewer are fit to rule others." -Edward Abbey
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
Re: the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <KM...@PCCC.com>.
On 12/8/2012 8:30 PM, darxus@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 12/08, Per Jessen wrote:
>> FYI, see $SUBJ.
> Much like the 3.2.5 release which that page still unfortunately implies is
> reasonable to use.
I plan to fix these both with the 3.4.0 release assuming we can update
our website when that's done. Bug open about that issue.
> I'd love an explanation of a situation where somebody is running
> spamassassin but can't run sa-update, even once. I hear that exists.
Primarily I believe it exists for package maintainers to deliver a
working install.
Regards,
KAM
Re: the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient
Posted by Per Jessen <pe...@computer.org>.
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Per Jessen wrote:
>> darxus@chaosreigns.com wrote:
>> > Much like the 3.2.5 release which that page still unfortunately
>> > implies is reasonable to use.
>> >
>> > I'd love an explanation of a situation where somebody is running
>> > spamassassin but can't run sa-update, even once. I hear that
>> > exists.
>>
>> A system isolated from the outside world during installation?
>
> An isolated system that processes email?
Sure, why not - e.g. sent internally during installation and testing.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (-0.6°C)
http://www.dns24.ch/ - free DNS hosting, made in Switzerland.
Re: the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient
Posted by Bob Proulx <bo...@proulx.com>.
Per Jessen wrote:
> darxus@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> > Much like the 3.2.5 release which that page still unfortunately
> > implies is reasonable to use.
> >
> > I'd love an explanation of a situation where somebody is running
> > spamassassin but can't run sa-update, even once. I hear that exists.
>
> A system isolated from the outside world during installation?
An isolated system that processes email?
Bob
Re: the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient
Posted by Per Jessen <pe...@computer.org>.
darxus@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 12/08, Per Jessen wrote:
>> FYI, see $SUBJ.
>
> Much like the 3.2.5 release which that page still unfortunately
> implies is reasonable to use.
>
> I'd love an explanation of a situation where somebody is running
> spamassassin but can't run sa-update, even once. I hear that exists.
>
A system isolated from the outside world during installation?
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (-2.1°C)
http://www.dns24.ch/ - free DNS hosting, made in Switzerland.
Re: the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient
Posted by da...@chaosreigns.com.
On 12/08, Per Jessen wrote:
> FYI, see $SUBJ.
Much like the 3.2.5 release which that page still unfortunately implies is
reasonable to use.
I'd love an explanation of a situation where somebody is running
spamassassin but can't run sa-update, even once. I hear that exists.
--
"We will be dead soon. Is this how we want to live?"
http://www.ChaosReigns.com