You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by julien viet <ju...@jboss.com> on 2004/10/17 11:21:34 UTC
What is implemented in jackrabbit ?
Hello,
after browsing the source code, I saw that locking was not implemented
(yet). Is it possible to point
me a document that describes what is implemented what is not and a
roadmap, if it exists of course. Otherwise
can we discuss it here ?
thanks
julien
Re: What is implemented in jackrabbit ?
Posted by julien viet <ju...@jboss.com>.
thanks for the clarification David, I am glad we share same concerns.
Leading jackrabbit to the release is obviously the priority at short term.
julien
David Nuescheler wrote:
>hi julien,
>
>
>
>>>but HA/clustering support is certainly something worth looking at
>>>once jackrabbit is stable.
>>>
>>>
>>yes, it's not because the spec does not mention it that it cant be done.
>>if you look at the whole j2ee spec, the servlet spec is the only one
>>that talks a bit about it (tag distributable),
>>however most j2ee vendors supports it.
>>
>>
>
>agreed. i would even go further and say that
>repository clustering is probably a very frequent
>requirement that should be on the roadmap of
>any enterprise class repository.
>
>i guess what stefan was talking about was the following
>mechanism that is mandated by the jcp:
>
>to get a final approval of jsr-170 we need to have a reference
>implementation that passes 100% of the tck.
>and i would argue that before the spec is finalized we (day
>software at least in the role of the spec-lead) will have to
>focus our work on getting the reference implementation to
>pass 100% of the tck (and to get the tck developed in the
>first place), which only means that we as the spec lead
>are in the weird position to have a list of priorities which
>is indicated by jcp.
>which of course is not applicable for anybody else.
>
>of course anybody in the jackrabbit community is
>very welcome contribute many excellent features
>to jackrabbit which are outside the spec (like
>wolfgangs jdbc suggestion).
>
>regards,
>david
>
>.ps: also people might want to be cautious with
>massive extensions until the spec is finally
>approved just to save on redo work...
>
>
>
Re: What is implemented in jackrabbit ?
Posted by David Nuescheler <da...@gmail.com>.
hi julien,
>> but HA/clustering support is certainly something worth looking at
>> once jackrabbit is stable.
> yes, it's not because the spec does not mention it that it cant be done.
> if you look at the whole j2ee spec, the servlet spec is the only one
> that talks a bit about it (tag distributable),
> however most j2ee vendors supports it.
agreed. i would even go further and say that
repository clustering is probably a very frequent
requirement that should be on the roadmap of
any enterprise class repository.
i guess what stefan was talking about was the following
mechanism that is mandated by the jcp:
to get a final approval of jsr-170 we need to have a reference
implementation that passes 100% of the tck.
and i would argue that before the spec is finalized we (day
software at least in the role of the spec-lead) will have to
focus our work on getting the reference implementation to
pass 100% of the tck (and to get the tck developed in the
first place), which only means that we as the spec lead
are in the weird position to have a list of priorities which
is indicated by jcp.
which of course is not applicable for anybody else.
of course anybody in the jackrabbit community is
very welcome contribute many excellent features
to jackrabbit which are outside the spec (like
wolfgangs jdbc suggestion).
regards,
david
.ps: also people might want to be cautious with
massive extensions until the spec is finally
approved just to save on redo work...
Re: What is implemented in jackrabbit ?
Posted by julien viet <ju...@jboss.com>.
yes, it's not because the spec does not mention it that it cant be done.
if you look at the whole j2ee spec, the servlet spec is the only one
that talks a bit about it (tag distributable),
however most j2ee vendors supports it.
cheers
julien
Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
>On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:27:04 +0200, julien viet <ju...@jboss.com> wrote:
>
>
>>thanks for the update.
>>
>>are there any plans for HA/clustering in the future ?
>>
>>
>
>not as far as i know. our main goal is getting jackrabbit feature complete.
>as clustering is not part of the spec we didn't bother so far.
>
>but HA/clustering support is certainly something worth looking at
>once jackrabbit is stable.
>
>cheers
>stefan
>
>
>
>>cheers,
>>
>>julien
>>
>>
>>
>>Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>the main jsr 170 features not yet implemented are transactions and locking.
>>>i will commit a first jta support implementation in the next couple of days.
>>>locking support will follow in the next couple of weeks.
>>>
>>>apart from that, there's ongoing work such as:
>>>bug fixing, tweaking, optimizing, documenting, add-ons, etc etc
>>>
>>>we plan to have jackrabbit feature complete according to the spec
>>>(i.e. jsr 170 level 2 plus all optional features) by the end of the
>>>year.
>>>
>>>cheers
>>>stefan
>>>
>>>
>>>On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:30:22 +0200, julien viet <ju...@jboss.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>thanks a lot
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>J.Alkjaer@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>There is a ToDo.txt in subversion.
>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/jackrabbit/trunk/?root=Apache-SVN
>>>>>
>>>>>Judging by the age it's the place to look.
>>>>>I'm window shopping the project, so I'm actually guessing here.
>>>>>
>>>>>Johal
>>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:21:34 +0200, julien viet <ju...@jboss.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>after browsing the source code, I saw that locking was not implemented
>>>>>>(yet). Is it possible to point
>>>>>>me a document that describes what is implemented what is not and a
>>>>>>roadmap, if it exists of course. Otherwise
>>>>>>can we discuss it here ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>julien
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: What is implemented in jackrabbit ?
Posted by Stefan Guggisberg <st...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:27:04 +0200, julien viet <ju...@jboss.com> wrote:
> thanks for the update.
>
> are there any plans for HA/clustering in the future ?
not as far as i know. our main goal is getting jackrabbit feature complete.
as clustering is not part of the spec we didn't bother so far.
but HA/clustering support is certainly something worth looking at
once jackrabbit is stable.
cheers
stefan
>
> cheers,
>
> julien
>
>
>
> Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
>
> >the main jsr 170 features not yet implemented are transactions and locking.
> >i will commit a first jta support implementation in the next couple of days.
> >locking support will follow in the next couple of weeks.
> >
> >apart from that, there's ongoing work such as:
> >bug fixing, tweaking, optimizing, documenting, add-ons, etc etc
> >
> >we plan to have jackrabbit feature complete according to the spec
> >(i.e. jsr 170 level 2 plus all optional features) by the end of the
> >year.
> >
> >cheers
> >stefan
> >
> >
> >On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:30:22 +0200, julien viet <ju...@jboss.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>thanks a lot
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>J.Alkjaer@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>There is a ToDo.txt in subversion.
> >>>http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/jackrabbit/trunk/?root=Apache-SVN
> >>>
> >>>Judging by the age it's the place to look.
> >>>I'm window shopping the project, so I'm actually guessing here.
> >>>
> >>>Johal
> >>>
> >>>On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:21:34 +0200, julien viet <ju...@jboss.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>>after browsing the source code, I saw that locking was not implemented
> >>>>(yet). Is it possible to point
> >>>>me a document that describes what is implemented what is not and a
> >>>>roadmap, if it exists of course. Otherwise
> >>>>can we discuss it here ?
> >>>>
> >>>>thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>julien
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: What is implemented in jackrabbit ?
Posted by julien viet <ju...@jboss.com>.
thanks for the update.
are there any plans for HA/clustering in the future ?
cheers,
julien
Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
>the main jsr 170 features not yet implemented are transactions and locking.
>i will commit a first jta support implementation in the next couple of days.
>locking support will follow in the next couple of weeks.
>
>apart from that, there's ongoing work such as:
>bug fixing, tweaking, optimizing, documenting, add-ons, etc etc
>
>we plan to have jackrabbit feature complete according to the spec
>(i.e. jsr 170 level 2 plus all optional features) by the end of the
>year.
>
>cheers
>stefan
>
>
>On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:30:22 +0200, julien viet <ju...@jboss.com> wrote:
>
>
>>thanks a lot
>>
>>
>>
>>J.Alkjaer@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>There is a ToDo.txt in subversion.
>>>http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/jackrabbit/trunk/?root=Apache-SVN
>>>
>>>Judging by the age it's the place to look.
>>>I'm window shopping the project, so I'm actually guessing here.
>>>
>>>Johal
>>>
>>>On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:21:34 +0200, julien viet <ju...@jboss.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hello,
>>>>
>>>>after browsing the source code, I saw that locking was not implemented
>>>>(yet). Is it possible to point
>>>>me a document that describes what is implemented what is not and a
>>>>roadmap, if it exists of course. Otherwise
>>>>can we discuss it here ?
>>>>
>>>>thanks
>>>>
>>>>julien
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: What is implemented in jackrabbit ?
Posted by Stefan Guggisberg <st...@gmail.com>.
the main jsr 170 features not yet implemented are transactions and locking.
i will commit a first jta support implementation in the next couple of days.
locking support will follow in the next couple of weeks.
apart from that, there's ongoing work such as:
bug fixing, tweaking, optimizing, documenting, add-ons, etc etc
we plan to have jackrabbit feature complete according to the spec
(i.e. jsr 170 level 2 plus all optional features) by the end of the
year.
cheers
stefan
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:30:22 +0200, julien viet <ju...@jboss.com> wrote:
> thanks a lot
>
>
>
> J.Alkjaer@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >There is a ToDo.txt in subversion.
> >http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/jackrabbit/trunk/?root=Apache-SVN
> >
> >Judging by the age it's the place to look.
> >I'm window shopping the project, so I'm actually guessing here.
> >
> >Johal
> >
> >On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:21:34 +0200, julien viet <ju...@jboss.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>after browsing the source code, I saw that locking was not implemented
> >>(yet). Is it possible to point
> >>me a document that describes what is implemented what is not and a
> >>roadmap, if it exists of course. Otherwise
> >>can we discuss it here ?
> >>
> >>thanks
> >>
> >>julien
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: What is implemented in jackrabbit ?
Posted by julien viet <ju...@jboss.com>.
thanks a lot
J.Alkjaer@gmail.com wrote:
>There is a ToDo.txt in subversion.
>http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/jackrabbit/trunk/?root=Apache-SVN
>
>Judging by the age it's the place to look.
>I'm window shopping the project, so I'm actually guessing here.
>
>Johal
>
>On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:21:34 +0200, julien viet <ju...@jboss.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>after browsing the source code, I saw that locking was not implemented
>>(yet). Is it possible to point
>>me a document that describes what is implemented what is not and a
>>roadmap, if it exists of course. Otherwise
>>can we discuss it here ?
>>
>>thanks
>>
>>julien
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: What is implemented in jackrabbit ?
Posted by J....@gmail.com.
There is a ToDo.txt in subversion.
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/jackrabbit/trunk/?root=Apache-SVN
Judging by the age it's the place to look.
I'm window shopping the project, so I'm actually guessing here.
Johal
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:21:34 +0200, julien viet <ju...@jboss.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after browsing the source code, I saw that locking was not implemented
> (yet). Is it possible to point
> me a document that describes what is implemented what is not and a
> roadmap, if it exists of course. Otherwise
> can we discuss it here ?
>
> thanks
>
> julien
>