You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/03/25 07:39:53 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (CAMEL-8541) Came main TestSupport class is
incompatible with the CDI specification
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Claus Ibsen updated CAMEL-8541:
-------------------------------
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> Came main TestSupport class is incompatible with the CDI specification
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-8541
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8541
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-test
> Affects Versions: 2.12.5, 2.14.2
> Reporter: Alex Savitsky
>
> JUnit4 test support class (org.apache.camel.test.junit4.TestSupport) contains the following declaration:
> {noformat}
> // CHECKSTYLE:OFF
> @Rule
> public TestName testName = new TestName();
> // CHECKSTYLE:ON
> {noformat}
> In addition to being a terrible idea overall, this public field also breaks CDI integration, as any tests attempted to be bootstrapped in CDI will throw the following error (WELD trace is shown for an example):
> {noformat}
> org.jboss.weld.exceptions.DefinitionException: WELD-000075: Normal scoped managed bean implementation class has a public field: [EnhancedAnnotatedFieldImpl] @Rule public com.netotc.ha.route.TestCDI.testName
> at org.jboss.weld.bean.ManagedBean.checkBeanImplementation(ManagedBean.java:227)
> at org.jboss.weld.bean.AbstractClassBean.internalInitialize(AbstractClassBean.java:74)
> at org.jboss.weld.bean.ManagedBean.internalInitialize(ManagedBean.java:105)
> at org.jboss.weld.bean.RIBean.initialize(RIBean.java:66)
> at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.ConcurrentBeanDeployer$5.doWork(ConcurrentBeanDeployer.java:121)
> at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.ConcurrentBeanDeployer$5.doWork(ConcurrentBeanDeployer.java:118)
> at org.jboss.weld.executor.IterativeWorkerTaskFactory$1.call(IterativeWorkerTaskFactory.java:60)
> at org.jboss.weld.executor.IterativeWorkerTaskFactory$1.call(IterativeWorkerTaskFactory.java:53)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {noformat}
> Suggesting to create a getter for this field, making the field private, and moving the @Rule annotation to the getter.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)