You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2006/01/08 08:44:41 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38177] New: - apache-1.3.33/34: mod_log_forensic module use of assert() vs. ap_assert() introduces __eprintf() gcc-ism?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38177>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38177
Summary: apache-1.3.33/34: mod_log_forensic module use of
assert() vs. ap_assert() introduces __eprintf() gcc-ism?
Product: Apache httpd-1.3
Version: 1.3.34
Platform: Sun
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: mod_log_forensic
AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
ReportedBy: wcheung@ucsd.edu
CC: wcheung@ucsd.edu
1) On 11/13/04, per the recommendation on the Apache website, I submitted
the following question/bug report/patch regarding a possible problem
with the mod_log_forensic module's use of assert() vs. ap_assert()
under Solaris to the "apache-httpd-users" mailing list (it causes
a "mod_log_forensic.so: symbol __eprintf: referenced symbol not found"
error when attempting to run "httpd"):
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-users&m=110039542317294&w=2
On 11/14/04, Joshua Slive recommended I instead submit this report to
"apache-httpd-dev" mailing list or the Apache bugs database:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-users&m=110045679622830&w=2
2) On 11/14/04, Jim Jagielski replied to this issue on the apache-httpd-dev
mailing list and also proposed a more formal patch for the problem:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=110045758526041&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=110045807628303&w=2
3) Jeff Trawick submitted a "+1" reply to Jim Jagielski's proposed patch
on 11/14/04 and so did Andre Malo on 11/15/04:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=110045945314944&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=110051618628764&w=2
Since I did not see any follow-up negative responses to Jim Jagielski's
proposed patch, I had assumed that discussing this problem on the
developer's mailing list meant it would be included in the next
apache-1.3.x release?
4) On 01/08/06, I compiled the latest apache-1.3.34 version (released on
10/18/05) and I see that this issue with the mod_log_forensic.c file
still exists so apparently this minor patch from almost a year ago
apparently did not make it into the apache-1.3.x release cycle.
I'm now submitting this bug report to request that it be committed
for inclusion in the next apache-1.3.x release (whenever that occurs).
Thank you!
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38177] - apache-1.3.33/34: mod_log_forensic module use of assert() vs. ap_assert() introduces __eprintf() gcc-ism?
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38177>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38177
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From rooneg@electricjellyfish.net 2006-01-11 05:25 -------
Committed to the 1.3.x branch in r367914. Thanks for the reminder!
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org