You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com> on 2008/01/23 23:15:53 UTC
XML schemas documentation for 2.1
Howdy,
I'm working on documenting the deployment plans for 2.1, part of that documentation includes covering the XML schemas.
While looking at the schemas I see attributes-1.1.xsd and attributes-1.2.xsd although I haven't found any reference to attributes-1.1. Are we still using this schema?
Cheers!
Hernan
Re: XML schemas documentation for 2.1
Posted by "Jay D. McHugh" <ja...@jnwd.net>.
Don't think we need a JIRA.
I'll go ahead and get rid of the old version.
It is still in use for Geronimo 2.0.x (and older).
Jay
Hernan Cunico wrote:
> My thunderbird just crashed and I lost all 2008 mails. I thought this
> one didn't make it, cool it still hit the list.
>
> I'm using rev #612130 and the binaries include a schema/attributes-1.1.xsd
>
> I'll skip documenting attributes-1.1.xsd but somebody should remove it
> from the build if we no longer use it. I would do it myself but don't
> where this one is coming from.
> Do we need a JIRA for this?
>
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
> Jay D. McHugh wrote:
>> Hey Hernan,
>>
>> We should not be using 1.1 anymore.
>>
>> If you -had- found somewhere that it was being used, then that would
>> have been a problem. The 1.2 version is where comment support was
>> added to the config.xml file.
>>
>>
>> Jay
>>
>> Hernan Cunico wrote:
>>> Howdy,
>>> I'm working on documenting the deployment plans for 2.1, part of that
>>> documentation includes covering the XML schemas.
>>>
>>> While looking at the schemas I see attributes-1.1.xsd and
>>> attributes-1.2.xsd although I haven't found any reference to
>>> attributes-1.1. Are we still using this schema?
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>> Hernan
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: XML schemas documentation for 2.1
Posted by Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>.
My thunderbird just crashed and I lost all 2008 mails. I thought this one didn't make it, cool it still hit the list.
I'm using rev #612130 and the binaries include a schema/attributes-1.1.xsd
I'll skip documenting attributes-1.1.xsd but somebody should remove it from the build if we no longer use it. I would do it myself but don't where this one is coming from.
Do we need a JIRA for this?
Cheers!
Hernan
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
> Hey Hernan,
>
> We should not be using 1.1 anymore.
>
> If you -had- found somewhere that it was being used, then that would
> have been a problem. The 1.2 version is where comment support was added
> to the config.xml file.
>
>
> Jay
>
> Hernan Cunico wrote:
>> Howdy,
>> I'm working on documenting the deployment plans for 2.1, part of that
>> documentation includes covering the XML schemas.
>>
>> While looking at the schemas I see attributes-1.1.xsd and
>> attributes-1.2.xsd although I haven't found any reference to
>> attributes-1.1. Are we still using this schema?
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Hernan
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: XML schemas documentation for 2.1
Posted by "Jay D. McHugh" <ja...@jnwd.net>.
Hey Hernan,
We should not be using 1.1 anymore.
If you -had- found somewhere that it was being used, then that would
have been a problem. The 1.2 version is where comment support was added
to the config.xml file.
Jay
Hernan Cunico wrote:
> Howdy,
> I'm working on documenting the deployment plans for 2.1, part of that
> documentation includes covering the XML schemas.
>
> While looking at the schemas I see attributes-1.1.xsd and
> attributes-1.2.xsd although I haven't found any reference to
> attributes-1.1. Are we still using this schema?
>
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
>
XML schemas documentation for 2.1
Posted by Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>.
Hi All,
I just updated the XML schemas documentation for 2.1 on the web site (couldn't use the wiki). Here is the link http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v21-xml-schemas.html
I also matched the actual schemas file name with their target namespaces to make the IDEs happier ;-)
I'll get back to working on the deployment plans now.
PS, pls bring your ideas to the --> [DISCUSSION] Geronimo v2.1 documentation - Content <-- thread.
Cheers!
Hernan
XML schemas documentation for 2.1
Posted by Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>.
Hi All,
I just updated the XML schemas documentation for 2.1 on the web site (couldn't use the wiki). Here is the link http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v21-xml-schemas.html
I also matched the actual schemas file name with their target namespaces to make the IDEs happier ;-)
I'll get back to working on the deployment plans now.
PS, pls bring your ideas to the --> [DISCUSSION] Geronimo v2.1 documentation - Content <-- thread.
Cheers!
Hernan
Re: XML schemas documentation for 2.1
Posted by Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>.
Hey Tim,
If you mean those over http://geronimo.apache.org/schemas-2.1/docs/ ( they are still baking ;-) )
Most of it is generated with Oxygen, just testing it for now but so far I like the way it presents the info the most compared to other XSD documentation tools. But Oxygen is not the whole story there is a lot of additional "home cooking" to make it look the way it looks there.
Cheers!
Hernan
Tim McConnell wrote:
> Howdy to you too Hernan, I really like the HTML and schemaDiagrams
> you're providing for those of us who are XSD-impaired. Just curious what
> tool(s) you're using to generate them ??
>
> Hernan Cunico wrote:
>> Howdy,
>> I'm working on documenting the deployment plans for 2.1, part of that
>> documentation includes covering the XML schemas.
>>
>> While looking at the schemas I see attributes-1.1.xsd and
>> attributes-1.2.xsd although I haven't found any reference to
>> attributes-1.1. Are we still using this schema?
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Hernan
>>
>
Re: XML schemas documentation for 2.1
Posted by Tim McConnell <ti...@gmail.com>.
Howdy to you too Hernan, I really like the HTML and schemaDiagrams you're
providing for those of us who are XSD-impaired. Just curious what tool(s) you're
using to generate them ??
Hernan Cunico wrote:
> Howdy,
> I'm working on documenting the deployment plans for 2.1, part of that
> documentation includes covering the XML schemas.
>
> While looking at the schemas I see attributes-1.1.xsd and
> attributes-1.2.xsd although I haven't found any reference to
> attributes-1.1. Are we still using this schema?
>
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell