You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by "maheshk114 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2024/04/01 03:27:09 UTC
Re: [PR] [SPARK-47141][CORE] Support enabling migration of shuffle data directly to external storage using config parameter. [spark]
maheshk114 commented on PR #45228:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/45228#issuecomment-2029095673
> I am also concerned about the performance.
>
> I think the best would be if the migration of shuffle data to external storage would only kick in when the scale down is aggressive. This can be decided by checking the ratio of the number of available peers (non-decommissioning executors) and the number of decommissioning executors. In that case the parameter would not be a single boolean flag but a threshold for the ratio.
>
> @maheshk114 WDYT?
Its not only performance but also useful when the nodes are not very reliable. So I think we should have a Boolean flag also to allow user to chose to migrate the shuffle directly to external storage.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org