Neo4j plugins inclusion

[Matt Casters <ma...@neo4j.com.INVALID>]

Dear Hoppers,

We have support for many technologies in the codebase.  Now that Hop is
becoming more and more popular (and effective) some of my Neo4j colleagues
have started to wonder why the Neo4j plugins for Hop aren't included.
It's a valid question.  Since there aren't any licensing concerns I would
like to ask you to let me know in the next couple of days if there are any
objections.  If there aren't any I'll include the plugin under
*plugins/misc/neo4j
*(until we figure out a better way to classify these plugins).

Thanks in advance for any feedback,

Matt
-- 
Neo4j Chief Solutions Architect

Re: Neo4j plugins inclusion

["Sergio Ramazzina (SERASOFT)" <se...@serasoft.it>]

Wonderful!

Il 12/03/2021 19:45, Bart Maertens ha scritto:
> the sooner the better!
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 5:40 PM Hans Van Akelyen <ha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> No objections at all! Support for the Neo4j platform is a great addition to
>> the project.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Hans
>>
>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 17:33, Matt Casters <matt.casters@neo4j.com
>> .invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Hoppers,
>>>
>>> We have support for many technologies in the codebase.  Now that Hop is
>>> becoming more and more popular (and effective) some of my Neo4j
>> colleagues
>>> have started to wonder why the Neo4j plugins for Hop aren't included.
>>> It's a valid question.  Since there aren't any licensing concerns I would
>>> like to ask you to let me know in the next couple of days if there are
>> any
>>> objections.  If there aren't any I'll include the plugin under
>>> *plugins/misc/neo4j
>>> *(until we figure out a better way to classify these plugins).
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for any feedback,
>>>
>>> Matt
>>> --
>>> Neo4j Chief Solutions Architect
>>>

Re: Neo4j plugins inclusion

[Bart Maertens <ba...@know.bi>]

the sooner the better!



On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 5:40 PM Hans Van Akelyen <ha...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> No objections at all! Support for the Neo4j platform is a great addition to
> the project.
>
> Cheers,
> Hans
>
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 17:33, Matt Casters <matt.casters@neo4j.com
> .invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Hoppers,
> >
> > We have support for many technologies in the codebase.  Now that Hop is
> > becoming more and more popular (and effective) some of my Neo4j
> colleagues
> > have started to wonder why the Neo4j plugins for Hop aren't included.
> > It's a valid question.  Since there aren't any licensing concerns I would
> > like to ask you to let me know in the next couple of days if there are
> any
> > objections.  If there aren't any I'll include the plugin under
> > *plugins/misc/neo4j
> > *(until we figure out a better way to classify these plugins).
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any feedback,
> >
> > Matt
> > --
> > Neo4j Chief Solutions Architect
> >
>

Re: Neo4j plugins inclusion

[Hans Van Akelyen <ha...@gmail.com>]

Hello,

No objections at all! Support for the Neo4j platform is a great addition to
the project.

Cheers,
Hans

On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 17:33, Matt Casters <ma...@neo4j.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Dear Hoppers,
>
> We have support for many technologies in the codebase.  Now that Hop is
> becoming more and more popular (and effective) some of my Neo4j colleagues
> have started to wonder why the Neo4j plugins for Hop aren't included.
> It's a valid question.  Since there aren't any licensing concerns I would
> like to ask you to let me know in the next couple of days if there are any
> objections.  If there aren't any I'll include the plugin under
> *plugins/misc/neo4j
> *(until we figure out a better way to classify these plugins).
>
> Thanks in advance for any feedback,
>
> Matt
> --
> Neo4j Chief Solutions Architect
>