You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cloudstack.apache.org by David Comerford <da...@gmail.com> on 2012/10/17 11:46:22 UTC
More SSVMs please waiter
Is there a way to induce the creation of some more SSVMs?
My storage connectivity isn't the greatest and it would be nice to balance
out the workloads a bit.
Cheers guys,
David Comerford
Re: More SSVMs please waiter
Posted by Kirk Kosinski <ki...@gmail.com>.
Hi, David. Do you mean as an automatic process? CloudStack will create
SSVMs as needed (based on the configuration mentioned by Somesh), but I
don't think they will be destroyed automatically. You can destroy an
SSVM manually via API or UI, but it may be recreated depending on the
configuration. If you want to remove an extra SSVM and not replace it,
change the configuration accordingly and then proceed to destroy the SSVM.
Best regards,
Kirk
On 10/17/2012 03:55 AM, David Comerford wrote:
> Sounds good. Thanks!
> I read a while ago that SSVMs can be created as needed but not destroyed.
> Is that still the case?
>
>
> On 17 October 2012 11:04, Somesh Naidu <So...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, it is. Please set the global configuration parameter
>> "secstorage.capacity.standby " to a higher value. You may also want to
>> lower "secstorage.session.max" so as to balance out the workloads.
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> Regards,
>> Somesh
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Comerford [mailto:davestyle@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:16 PM
>> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: More SSVMs please waiter
>>
>> Is there a way to induce the creation of some more SSVMs?
>> My storage connectivity isn't the greatest and it would be nice to balance
>> out the workloads a bit.
>>
>> Cheers guys,
>> David Comerford
>>
>
Re: More SSVMs please waiter
Posted by David Comerford <da...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good. Thanks!
I read a while ago that SSVMs can be created as needed but not destroyed.
Is that still the case?
On 17 October 2012 11:04, Somesh Naidu <So...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Yes, it is. Please set the global configuration parameter
> "secstorage.capacity.standby " to a higher value. You may also want to
> lower "secstorage.session.max" so as to balance out the workloads.
>
> HTH
>
> Regards,
> Somesh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Comerford [mailto:davestyle@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:16 PM
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: More SSVMs please waiter
>
> Is there a way to induce the creation of some more SSVMs?
> My storage connectivity isn't the greatest and it would be nice to balance
> out the workloads a bit.
>
> Cheers guys,
> David Comerford
>
RE: More SSVMs please waiter
Posted by Somesh Naidu <So...@citrix.com>.
Yes, it is. Please set the global configuration parameter "secstorage.capacity.standby " to a higher value. You may also want to lower "secstorage.session.max" so as to balance out the workloads.
HTH
Regards,
Somesh
-----Original Message-----
From: David Comerford [mailto:davestyle@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:16 PM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: More SSVMs please waiter
Is there a way to induce the creation of some more SSVMs?
My storage connectivity isn't the greatest and it would be nice to balance
out the workloads a bit.
Cheers guys,
David Comerford