You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Skip Brott <sb...@dmp.com> on 2008/07/14 19:01:34 UTC
sare rules?
This was probably discussed at some point, but I haven't been getting emails
from the list for some time.
The dates I see on all my sare rule sets are in January when I moved to
3.2.4. My updates_spamassassin_org.cf file is dated June 17.
I debugged saupdate and this appears correct. But recently I am seeing an
increase in spam reaching my end users.
Is there something more that I can be doing? Maybe I need to start updating
from some additional rule sets?
- Skip
Re: sare rules?
Posted by Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>.
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 16:52 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2008, at 13:01, "Skip Brott" <sb...@dmp.com> wrote:
> > This was probably discussed at some point, but I haven't been
> > getting emails from the list for some time.
> >
> > The dates I see on all my sare rule sets are in January when I moved
> > to 3.2.4. My updates_spamassassin_org.cf file is dated June 17.
Yes, this indeed is correct. Currently, there are no updates to SARE,
and there haven't been any in quite a while.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200806.mbox/%3c4857556C.3030602@alexb.ch%3e
> > I debugged saupdate and this appears correct. But recently I am
> > seeing an increase in spam reaching my end users.
> >
> > Is there something more that I can be doing? Maybe I need to start
> > updating from some additional rule sets?
Yes, maybe. Hard to tell without any samples...
> Start also using JM SOUGHT rules. Search the archives and google for
> context.
Or start here. :) http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SoughtRules
guenther
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
Re: sare rules?
Posted by Sahil Tandon <sa...@tandon.net>.
On Jul 14, 2008, at 13:01, "Skip Brott" <sb...@dmp.com> wrote:
> This was probably discussed at some point, but I haven't been
> getting emails from the list for some time.
>
> The dates I see on all my sare rule sets are in January when I moved
> to 3.2.4. My updates_spamassassin_org.cf file is dated June 17.
>
> I debugged saupdate and this appears correct. But recently I am
> seeing an increase in spam reaching my end users.
>
> Is there something more that I can be doing? Maybe I need to start
> updating from some additional rule sets?
Start also using JM SOUGHT rules. Search the archives and google for
context.
Re: sare rules?
Posted by Jeff Chan <je...@surbl.org>.
On Monday, July 14, 2008, 10:01:34 AM, Skip Brott wrote:
> I am seeing an
> increase in spam reaching my end users.
>
> Is there something more that I can be doing? Maybe I need to start updating
> from some additional rule sets?
Do you have network tests enabled?
What kinds of spams are getting through? 419s are hard to
catch.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:jeffc@surbl.org
http://www.surbl.org/