You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by oferhalevi <of...@intuwave.com> on 2006/10/18 15:01:56 UTC

Stomp over SSL

Hi,

Does anybody have any ideas on how to add transport level security to the
Stomp connector?
Is it down to configuration, or is this feature simply not available (yet)?

--ofer.
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stomp-over-SSL-tf2466446.html#a6875720
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Stomp over SSL

Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 10/18/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> I think I'd actually prefer a protocol id that looks something like this:
>
> stomp+ssl://

Yeah, thats nicer :)

-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Re: Stomp over SSL

Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
I think I'd actually prefer a protocol id that looks something like this:

stomp+ssl://

On 10/18/06, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/18/06, oferhalevi <of...@intuwave.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anybody have any ideas on how to add transport level security to
> the
> > Stomp connector?
> > Is it down to configuration, or is this feature simply not available
> (yet)?
>
> Its more a case of we've never tried yet. From the Java server side of
> the fence it should be fairly simple to provide a stompssl transport
> which reuses the ssl transport but uses the stomp wire format.
>
> I wonder if there's a stomp client we can experiment with on the SSL
> side of things? Maybe the ruby client?
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>



-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Re: Stomp over SSL

Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 10/18/06, oferhalevi <of...@intuwave.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody have any ideas on how to add transport level security to the
> Stomp connector?
> Is it down to configuration, or is this feature simply not available (yet)?

Its more a case of we've never tried yet. From the Java server side of
the fence it should be fairly simple to provide a stompssl transport
which reuses the ssl transport but uses the stomp wire format.

I wonder if there's a stomp client we can experiment with on the SSL
side of things? Maybe the ruby client?

-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/