You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@harmony.apache.org by "Tim Ellison (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/03/30 17:02:26 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-280) Customized SecurityManager cannot
cooperate with AccessController correctly
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-280?page=all ]
Tim Ellison resolved HARMONY-280:
---------------------------------
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of HARMONY-121
> Customized SecurityManager cannot cooperate with AccessController correctly
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HARMONY-280
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-280
> Project: Harmony
> Type: Bug
> Components: Classlib
> Reporter: Paulex Yang
> Priority: Critical
>
> when user set a customized SecurityManager, which extends java.lang.SecurityManager, as the system-wide security manager, any security check fails in a stack overflow. This issue only happens when customized SecurityManager isn't located in bootstrap classpath.
> Following testcases reproduce this problem (suppose the test has permission to set securitymanager):
> public class securityTest extends TestCase {
> public void test_MockSecurityManager() throws Exception {
> SecurityManager old = System.getSecurityManager();
> System.setSecurityManager(new MockSecurityManager());
> try {
> System.getProperty("os.name");
> } catch (SecurityException e) {
> } finally {
> System.setSecurityManager(old);
> }
> }
> public class MockSecurityManager extends SecurityManager {
> public void checkPermission(Permission perm) {
> if (perm.getName().equals("setSecurityManager")) {
> return;
> }
> super.checkPermission(perm);
> }
> }
> }
> test runs smoothly on RI 5.0 , but fails with a StackOverflowError on Harmony
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-280) Customized SecurityManager cannot
cooperate with AccessController correctly
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Richard Liang wrote:
> I notice that Mikhail had provided the patch for Harmony-121 and we have
> some test cases about nio channels depending on the fix, would you
> please apply the patch for Harmony-121? Thanks a lot.
You can bug Mikhail directly now ;-)
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-280) Customized SecurityManager cannot
cooperate with AccessController correctly
Posted by Richard Liang <ri...@gmail.com>.
Tim Ellison (JIRA) wrote:
> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-280?page=all ]
>
> Tim Ellison resolved HARMONY-280:
> ---------------------------------
>
> Resolution: Duplicate
>
> Duplicate of HARMONY-121
>
>
>> Customized SecurityManager cannot cooperate with AccessController correctly
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Key: HARMONY-280
>> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-280
>> Project: Harmony
>> Type: Bug
>> Components: Classlib
>> Reporter: Paulex Yang
>> Priority: Critical
>>
>
>
>> when user set a customized SecurityManager, which extends java.lang.SecurityManager, as the system-wide security manager, any security check fails in a stack overflow. This issue only happens when customized SecurityManager isn't located in bootstrap classpath.
>> Following testcases reproduce this problem (suppose the test has permission to set securitymanager):
>> public class securityTest extends TestCase {
>> public void test_MockSecurityManager() throws Exception {
>> SecurityManager old = System.getSecurityManager();
>> System.setSecurityManager(new MockSecurityManager());
>> try {
>> System.getProperty("os.name");
>> } catch (SecurityException e) {
>> } finally {
>> System.setSecurityManager(old);
>> }
>> }
>> public class MockSecurityManager extends SecurityManager {
>> public void checkPermission(Permission perm) {
>> if (perm.getName().equals("setSecurityManager")) {
>> return;
>> }
>> super.checkPermission(perm);
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> test runs smoothly on RI 5.0 , but fails with a StackOverflowError on Harmony
>>
>
>
Hello Tim,
I notice that Mikhail had provided the patch for Harmony-121 and we have
some test cases about nio channels depending on the fix, would you
please apply the patch for Harmony-121? Thanks a lot.
--
Richard Liang
China Software Development Lab, IBM