You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Andrea Cosentino (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/08/24 09:39:00 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (CAMEL-8010) Race condition in AggregatorProcessor recovery sometimes causes duplicates (still)

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andrea Cosentino reassigned CAMEL-8010:
---------------------------------------

    Assignee: Andrea Cosentino

> Race condition in AggregatorProcessor recovery sometimes causes duplicates (still)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-8010
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8010
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: camel-core
>    Affects Versions: 2.14.0
>            Reporter: Marc Carter
>            Assignee: Andrea Cosentino
>             Fix For: 2.20.0
>
>
> CAMEL-6097 Patched a pretty clear race condition between the completion thread (CT) and recovery thread (RT) but leaves several holes when exercised with a Jdbc repository and a separate aggregation thread (AT).
> #1 is relevant to all repository backends.
> #2 only affects fully transactional backends
> I'm currently taking a look into this bug as its a show-stopper that _persistent_ repositories actually *decreases* reliability. (Untested) workaround is to add an in-memory idemptotentconsumer immediately after the aggregation.
> Here AT starts and completes an aggregation between defensive copy and when RT repo scanning starts. CT then confirms it (in memory (*)) before repo scanning ends.
> || AT || RT || CT ||
> | | inProg COPY to inProgCopy | |
> | repo START x | |  |
> | | | repo REMOVE x |
> | | | <commit> |
> |  | | inProg ADD x |
> | | repo SCAN (sees x) | |
> | | | {color:red}process x{color} |
> | | | repo CONFIRM x |
> | | | inProg REMOVE x | 
> | | | <commit> |
> | | x not inProg or inProgCopy | |
> | | {color:red}process x{color} | |
> | | repo CONFIRM x | | Fails silently as this is doInTransactionWithoutResult 
> | | <commit> | |
> {noformat}SQLWarning ignored: SQL state '02000', error code '10000', message [No row was found for FETCH, UPDATE or DELETE; or the result of a query is an empty table.]{noformat}
> (*) Side note: inProgressExchanges is updated by a {{Synchronisation}} inside the UOW so is immediately visible although any DB change may not be visible for ages (in threading terms) as the entire transaction must commit first.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)