You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/02/03 23:52:55 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26647] New: -
srcKey in tag needs matching size keys.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26647>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26647
srcKey in <html:img/> tag needs matching size keys.
Summary: srcKey in <html:img/> tag needs matching size keys.
Product: Struts
Version: 1.1 Final
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: Enhancement
Priority: Other
Component: Custom Tags
AssignedTo: struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: dgurovich@seebeyond.com
On high-traffic web sites it is necessary to add the height and width of any
image to allow for faster and more predictable loading. Under these
circumstances, it is very difficult to manage the images using the srcKey
attribute since the sizes must be either hard-coded into the tag or created
using some type of obtuse code to populate the boxes.
It would be much more desirable to have a "sizeKey" attribute where a
height/width of an item would be entered into a property file in a comma
delimited form (or other agreed upon format):
in the property file
myImage.image = /images/someFooImage.jpg
myImage.image.size = 180,160
The JSP img tag would look like:
<html:img srcKey="myImage.image" sizeKey="myImage.image.size"/>
We are moving a high-traffic site to struts (10-12+ million hits monthly) and
this has been a thorn in our side.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26647] New: - srcKey in tag
needs matching size keys.
Posted by Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Paul Sundling wrote:
> Joe Germuska wrote:
>
> > At 1:36 PM +1300 2/4/04, rms@paradise.net.nz wrote:
> >
> >> Quoting Paul Sundling <to...@tkz.net>:
> >>
> >>> I originally thought it said <html:image> instead of <html:img> . I
> >>> noticed that <html:image> does not have height and width. When I look
> >>> at my HTML Pocket Reference, I see only align, src and name listed for
> >>> <input type="image"..., but from testing I know that height and width
> >>> work for that tag in both mozilla and IE. Would it be worth adding
> >>> height and width to the <html:image> tag?
> >>
> >>
> >> Just as a matter of note, height and width should work with Netscape
> >> 4+ & IE 4+
> >> for <input type="image">. Looks like your pocket reference skimped
> >> on the
> >> details :)
> >>
> >> In terms of adding the two attributes to the <html:image> tag, I
> >> personally
> >> think it would make a useful addition...
> >
> >
> > "height" and "width" are not valid attributes of the "input" tag: see
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#h-17.4
> >
> > Joe
>
> I can't say I'm surprised to hear that since it wasn't in my little
> book. At the same time, if a given attribute is not part of the
> official W3C HTML spec, does that mean we shouldn't support the feature
> if there is browser support for it? This is more a philosophical issue
> on wether you're supporting the HTML standard, or the browser
> implementations of the standard. Is there a project stance on that?
Yes, there is. We currently support what's in the HTML 4.01 standard, no
more and no less.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Two main browsers since version 4 is pretty good support. If it's
> supported even in Safari and Opera or other, less common browsers, then
> I would say that's wide enough browser support to definitely consider.
> Of course, that's irrelevant if we're coding to spec and not implementation.
>
> Paul
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26647] New: - srcKey in tag
needs matching size keys.
Posted by Paul Sundling <to...@tkz.net>.
Joe Germuska wrote:
> At 1:36 PM +1300 2/4/04, rms@paradise.net.nz wrote:
>
>> Quoting Paul Sundling <to...@tkz.net>:
>>
>>> I originally thought it said <html:image> instead of <html:img> . I
>>> noticed that <html:image> does not have height and width. When I look
>>> at my HTML Pocket Reference, I see only align, src and name listed for
>>> <input type="image"..., but from testing I know that height and width
>>> work for that tag in both mozilla and IE. Would it be worth adding
>>> height and width to the <html:image> tag?
>>
>>
>> Just as a matter of note, height and width should work with Netscape
>> 4+ & IE 4+
>> for <input type="image">. Looks like your pocket reference skimped
>> on the
>> details :)
>>
>> In terms of adding the two attributes to the <html:image> tag, I
>> personally
>> think it would make a useful addition...
>
>
> "height" and "width" are not valid attributes of the "input" tag: see
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#h-17.4
>
> Joe
I can't say I'm surprised to hear that since it wasn't in my little
book. At the same time, if a given attribute is not part of the
official W3C HTML spec, does that mean we shouldn't support the feature
if there is browser support for it? This is more a philosophical issue
on wether you're supporting the HTML standard, or the browser
implementations of the standard. Is there a project stance on that?
Two main browsers since version 4 is pretty good support. If it's
supported even in Safari and Opera or other, less common browsers, then
I would say that's wide enough browser support to definitely consider.
Of course, that's irrelevant if we're coding to spec and not implementation.
Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26647] New: - srcKey in
tag needs matching size keys.
Posted by Joe Germuska <Jo...@Germuska.com>.
At 1:36 PM +1300 2/4/04, rms@paradise.net.nz wrote:
>Quoting Paul Sundling <to...@tkz.net>:
>
>> I originally thought it said <html:image> instead of <html:img> . I
>> noticed that <html:image> does not have height and width. When I look
>> at my HTML Pocket Reference, I see only align, src and name listed for
>> <input type="image"..., but from testing I know that height and width
>> work for that tag in both mozilla and IE. Would it be worth adding
>> height and width to the <html:image> tag?
>
>Just as a matter of note, height and width should work with Netscape
>4+ & IE 4+
>for <input type="image">. Looks like your pocket reference skimped on the
>details :)
>
>In terms of adding the two attributes to the <html:image> tag, I personally
>think it would make a useful addition...
"height" and "width" are not valid attributes of the "input" tag: see
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#h-17.4
Joe
--
Joe Germuska
Joe@Germuska.com
http://blog.germuska.com
"Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them
the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers, and
nobody thinks of complaining."
-- Jef Raskin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26647] New: - srcKey in tag
needs matching size keys.
Posted by rm...@paradise.net.nz.
Quoting Paul Sundling <to...@tkz.net>:
> I originally thought it said <html:image> instead of <html:img> . I
> noticed that <html:image> does not have height and width. When I look
> at my HTML Pocket Reference, I see only align, src and name listed for
> <input type="image"..., but from testing I know that height and width
> work for that tag in both mozilla and IE. Would it be worth adding
> height and width to the <html:image> tag?
Just as a matter of note, height and width should work with Netscape 4+ & IE 4+
for <input type="image">. Looks like your pocket reference skimped on the
details :)
In terms of adding the two attributes to the <html:image> tag, I personally
think it would make a useful addition...
Richard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26647] New: - srcKey in tag
needs matching size keys.
Posted by Paul Sundling <to...@tkz.net>.
This looks like fun.
I originally thought it said <html:image> instead of <html:img> . I
noticed that <html:image> does not have height and width. When I look
at my HTML Pocket Reference, I see only align, src and name listed for
<input type="image"..., but from testing I know that height and width
work for that tag in both mozilla and IE. Would it be worth adding
height and width to the <html:image> tag?
I'd be willing to take a whack at this one. Should this wait until
after 1.2 so that can be wrapped up?
I've been putting some other minor stuff on hold that I wanted to
mention until after the release.
If sizeKey was added to <html:img>, this brings up an issue. In the
many places where we have sizes, there is not a key version of it. Text
attributes like alt and title have resource versions like altKey and
titleKey. Number attributes like size, width and height do not. While
it's not a common thing to need varied sizes for numerical values, it's
very plausible. Is it worth complicating the AI?
Paul Sundling
bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26647
>
>srcKey in <html:img/> tag needs matching size keys.
>
>
>On high-traffic web sites it is necessary to add the height and width of any
>image to allow for faster and more predictable loading. Under these
>circumstances, it is very difficult to manage the images using the srcKey
>attribute since the sizes must be either hard-coded into the tag or created
>using some type of obtuse code to populate the boxes.
>
>It would be much more desirable to have a "sizeKey" attribute where a
>height/width of an item would be entered into a property file in a comma
>delimited form (or other agreed upon format):
>
>in the property file
>
>myImage.image = /images/someFooImage.jpg
>myImage.image.size = 180,160
>
>The JSP img tag would look like:
>
><html:img srcKey="myImage.image" sizeKey="myImage.image.size"/>
>
>We are moving a high-traffic site to struts (10-12+ million hits monthly) and
>this has been a thorn in our side.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: struts-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: struts-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org