You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4net-user@logging.apache.org by "Jordan JBO. Bouclet" <jb...@scotler.fr> on 2009/10/23 11:55:19 UTC
RE: multi process settings
Hi,
I have got a problem with the settings of log4net about multi access on
a file.
My context : I'v got a dll wich log into a trace.log. That dll is used
by 2 different programs. When the first create the instance of log4net,
the 2nd one can't write into the trace.log.
I can't find the right settings to do that. The best behavior would be
to create a new file with YYYYMMdd-HH_mm_ss when the instance can't
write into the file.
For now, I did, following the config-exemple from the apache site :
<log4net>
<root>
<level value="ALL" />
<appender-ref ref="FileAppender" />
</root>
<appender name="FileAppender"
type="log4net.Appender.RollingFileAppender">
<file value="E:\\Log\\Trace.log" />
<appendToFile value="True" />
<rollingStyle value="Date" />
<staticLogFileName value="false" />
<lockingModel
type="log4net.Appender.FileAppender+MinimalLock " />
<datePattern value="yyyyMMdd-HHmm" />
<maxSizeRollBackups value="-1" />
<layout type="log4net.Layout.PatternLayout">
<conversionPattern value="%date
[%-5level] : %message%newline" />
</layout>
</appender>
</log4net>
But I'm having an error with the 2nd instance wich is :
System.TypeLoadException: Could not load type
[log4net.Appender.FileAppender+MinimalLock ]. Tried assembly [log4net,
Version=1.2.10.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=1b44e1d426115821] and
all loaded assemblies.
Is there a solution to that ?
Thanks.
RE: multi process settings
Posted by David Gerler <dg...@gmail.com>.
Perhaps database logging would be better.
From: Florin Daneliuc [mailto:florin.daneliuc@iquestint.com]
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 8:26 AM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: RE: multi process settings
I think you can also instruct the logger to try to acquire the lock of the
file and release it as soon as possible.
Anyway, for multiple process logging, a file is not the best way. Maiby an
event log (windows) or syslog (nix) or a network sink might work better.
florin
_____
From: Jordan JBO. Bouclet [mailto:jbouclet@scotler.fr]
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 12:55 PM
To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: RE: multi process settings
Hi,
I have got a problem with the settings of log4net about multi access on a
file.
My context : I'v got a dll wich log into a trace.log. That dll is used by 2
different programs. When the first create the instance of log4net, the 2nd
one can't write into the trace.log.
I can't find the right settings to do that. The best behavior would be to
create a new file with YYYYMMdd-HH_mm_ss when the instance can't write into
the file.
For now, I did, following the config-exemple from the apache site :
<log4net>
<root>
<level value="ALL" />
<appender-ref ref="FileAppender" />
</root>
<appender name="FileAppender"
type="log4net.Appender.RollingFileAppender">
<file value="E:\\Log\\Trace.log" />
<appendToFile value="True" />
<rollingStyle value="Date" />
<staticLogFileName value="false" />
<lockingModel
type="log4net.Appender.FileAppender+MinimalLock " />
<datePattern value="yyyyMMdd-HHmm" />
<maxSizeRollBackups value="-1" />
<layout type="log4net.Layout.PatternLayout">
<conversionPattern value="%date [%-5level] :
%message%newline" />
</layout>
</appender>
</log4net>
But I'm having an error with the 2nd instance wich is :
System.TypeLoadException: Could not load type
[log4net.Appender.FileAppender+MinimalLock ]. Tried assembly [log4net,
Version=1.2.10.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=1b44e1d426115821] and all
loaded assemblies.
Is there a solution to that ?
Thanks.
RE: multi process settings
Posted by "Jordan JBO. Bouclet" <jb...@scotler.fr>.
Yep, i did it, it works, but now i'v got an other problem, i can't use an appendFile with the rolling on size or by date.
Here is what I've done :
<appender name="FileAppender" type="log4net.Appender.FileAppender">
<file value="E:\\Log\\ArlSQL_Log\\ArlSql.log" />
<lockingModel type="log4net.Appender.FileAppender+MinimalLock" />
<layout type="log4net.Layout.PatternLayout" value="%d [%t] %-5p %c - %m%n" />
</appender>
But for example, <maximumFileSize value="1MB" /> isn't usable with a type="log4net.Appender.FileAppender"> L
De : Florin Daneliuc [mailto:florin.daneliuc@iquestint.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 23 octobre 2009 15:26
À : Log4NET User
Objet : RE: multi process settings
I think you can also instruct the logger to try to acquire the lock of the file and release it as soon as possible.
Anyway, for multiple process logging, a file is not the best way. Maiby an event log (windows) or syslog (nix) or a network sink might work better.
florin
________________________________
From: Jordan JBO. Bouclet [mailto:jbouclet@scotler.fr]
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 12:55 PM
To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: RE: multi process settings
Hi,
I have got a problem with the settings of log4net about multi access on a file.
My context : I'v got a dll wich log into a trace.log. That dll is used by 2 different programs. When the first create the instance of log4net, the 2nd one can't write into the trace.log.
I can't find the right settings to do that. The best behavior would be to create a new file with YYYYMMdd-HH_mm_ss when the instance can't write into the file.
For now, I did, following the config-exemple from the apache site :
<log4net>
<root>
<level value="ALL" />
<appender-ref ref="FileAppender" />
</root>
<appender name="FileAppender" type="log4net.Appender.RollingFileAppender">
<file value="E:\\Log\\Trace.log" />
<appendToFile value="True" />
<rollingStyle value="Date" />
<staticLogFileName value="false" />
<lockingModel type="log4net.Appender.FileAppender+MinimalLock " />
<datePattern value="yyyyMMdd-HHmm" />
<maxSizeRollBackups value="-1" />
<layout type="log4net.Layout.PatternLayout">
<conversionPattern value="%date [%-5level] : %message%newline" />
</layout>
</appender>
</log4net>
But I'm having an error with the 2nd instance wich is : System.TypeLoadException: Could not load type [log4net.Appender.FileAppender+MinimalLock ]. Tried assembly [log4net, Version=1.2.10.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=1b44e1d426115821] and all loaded assemblies.
Is there a solution to that ?
Thanks.
RE: multi process settings
Posted by Florin Daneliuc <fl...@iquestint.com>.
I think you can also instruct the logger to try to acquire the lock of the file and release it as soon as possible.
Anyway, for multiple process logging, a file is not the best way. Maiby an event log (windows) or syslog (nix) or a network sink might work better.
florin
________________________________
From: Jordan JBO. Bouclet [mailto:jbouclet@scotler.fr]
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 12:55 PM
To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: RE: multi process settings
Hi,
I have got a problem with the settings of log4net about multi access on a file.
My context : I'v got a dll wich log into a trace.log. That dll is used by 2 different programs. When the first create the instance of log4net, the 2nd one can't write into the trace.log.
I can't find the right settings to do that. The best behavior would be to create a new file with YYYYMMdd-HH_mm_ss when the instance can't write into the file.
For now, I did, following the config-exemple from the apache site :
<log4net>
<root>
<level value="ALL" />
<appender-ref ref="FileAppender" />
</root>
<appender name="FileAppender" type="log4net.Appender.RollingFileAppender">
<file value="E:\\Log\\Trace.log" />
<appendToFile value="True" />
<rollingStyle value="Date" />
<staticLogFileName value="false" />
<lockingModel type="log4net.Appender.FileAppender+MinimalLock " />
<datePattern value="yyyyMMdd-HHmm" />
<maxSizeRollBackups value="-1" />
<layout type="log4net.Layout.PatternLayout">
<conversionPattern value="%date [%-5level] : %message%newline" />
</layout>
</appender>
</log4net>
But I'm having an error with the 2nd instance wich is : System.TypeLoadException: Could not load type [log4net.Appender.FileAppender+MinimalLock ]. Tried assembly [log4net, Version=1.2.10.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=1b44e1d426115821] and all loaded assemblies.
Is there a solution to that ?
Thanks.