[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-6651) Improve thread safety of HTablePool

["Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13527881#comment-13527881 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-6651:
----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12560157/HBASE-6651-V8.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 15 new or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 2.0 profile.

    {color:red}-1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool appears to have generated 111 warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:red}-1 findbugs{color}.  The patch appears to introduce 20 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
                       org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestAtomicOperation

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3471//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3471//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3471//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3471//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3471//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3471//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3471//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3471//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3471//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> Improve thread safety of HTablePool
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6651
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6651
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Client
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.1
>            Reporter: Hiroshi Ikeda
>            Assignee: Hiroshi Ikeda
>             Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-6651.patch, HBASE-6651-V2.patch, HBASE-6651-V3.patch, HBASE-6651-V4.patch, HBASE-6651-V5.patch, HBASE-6651-V6.patch, HBASE-6651-V7.patch, HBASE-6651-V8.patch, sample.zip, sample.zip, sharedmap_for_hbaseclient.zip
>
>
> There are some operations in HTablePool accessing PoolMap in multiple places without any explicit synchronization. 
> For example HTablePool.closeTablePool() calls PoolMap.values(), and calls PoolMap.remove(). If other threads add new instances to the pool in the middle of the calls, the newly added instances might be dropped. (HTablePool.closeTablePool() also has another problem that calling it by multiple threads causes accessing HTable by multiple threads.)
> Moreover, PoolMap is not thread safe for the same reason.
> For example PoolMap.put() calles ConcurrentMap.get() and calles ConcurrentMap.put(). If other threads add a new instance to the concurent map in the middle of the calls, the new instance might be dropped.
> And also implementations of Pool have the same problems.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira