You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by "Jeanne Waldman (JIRA)" <de...@myfaces.apache.org> on 2014/01/28 23:27:35 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (TRINIDAD-2448) Optimize ChangeManager.createDocumentChange() implementation

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13884791#comment-13884791 ] 

Jeanne Waldman commented on TRINIDAD-2448:
------------------------------------------

Sending content: C:\Trinidad\trinidad-api\src\main\java\org\apache\myfaces\trinidad\change\ChangeManager.java  
Sending content: C:\Trinidad\trinidad-api\src\main\java\org\apache\myfaces\trinidad\change\BaseChangeManager.java  
Completed: At revision: 1562288  


> Optimize ChangeManager.createDocumentChange() implementation
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TRINIDAD-2448
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2448
>             Project: MyFaces Trinidad
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.0-core
>            Reporter: Prakash Udupa
>             Fix For: 2.1.1-core
>
>         Attachments: TRINIDAD-2448_over_trunk.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> Currently the implementation of org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.change ChangeManager.createDocumentChange( ComponentChange change) does not account for fact that the supplied ComponentChange implementation can also be implementing DocumentChange. Improvement is to do this check first, type cast the supplied component to DocumentChange and return. 
> There are several ComponentChange implementations in Trinidad that actually also implement DocumentChange, so this is common usecase.
> Currently clients need to do this check outside of this call, which can be moved in here.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)