You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@pulsar.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/09/09 02:28:03 UTC

[GitHub] [pulsar] zymap opened a new pull request, #17554: [fix][test] Using another thread instead of io-thread for bookie

zymap opened a new pull request, #17554:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17554

   ---
   Master Issue: #17520 
   
   ### Motivation
   
   In the bookkeeper, the request processor should use a dedicated thread pool, not the io thread pool to process the request. Using io thread pool may cause some unexpected behaviors, such as a deadlock or something else. In the production, it doesn't make sense that use io thread pool to handle everything. So change the working thread to 1 to fix the problem.
   
   ### Modifications
   
   - change AddWorkerThreads, ReadWorkerThreads, and HighPriorityWorkerThreads to 1
   
   ### Verifying this change
   
   - [ ] Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.
   
   *(Please pick either of the following options)*
   
   This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
   
   *(or)*
   
   This change is already covered by existing tests, such as *(please describe tests)*.
   
   *(or)*
   
   This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
   
   *(example:)*
     - *Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)*
     - *Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure*
   
   ### Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
   *If `yes` was chosen, please highlight the changes*
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
     - The public API: (yes / no)
     - The schema: (yes / no / don't know)
     - The default values of configurations: (yes / no)
     - The wire protocol: (yes / no)
     - The rest endpoints: (yes / no)
     - The admin cli options: (yes / no)
     - Anything that affects deployment: (yes / no / don't know)
   
   ### Documentation
   
   Check the box below or label this PR directly.
   
   Need to update docs? 
   
   - [ ] `doc-required` 
   (Your PR needs to update docs and you will update later)
     
   - [x] `doc-not-needed` 
   (Please explain why)
     
   - [ ] `doc` 
   (Your PR contains doc changes)
   
   - [ ] `doc-complete`
   (Docs have been already added)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pulsar.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [pulsar] zymap closed pull request #17554: [fix][test] Using another thread instead of io-thread for bookie

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
zymap closed pull request #17554: [fix][test] Using another thread instead of io-thread for bookie
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17554


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pulsar.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [pulsar] zymap commented on pull request #17554: [fix][test] Using another thread instead of io-thread for bookie

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
zymap commented on PR #17554:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17554#issuecomment-1241456280

   Discussed with @codelipenghui and @hangc0276. We think the error happened caused by bookkeeper fix, and it doesn't impact the pulsar too much, so it is unnecessary to change the pulsar to tolerate that case.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@pulsar.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org