You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Chris <cp...@embarqmail.com> on 2008/07/11 02:45:30 UTC
6.8mb spam
Anyone seen these lately? The spam consists of a multi-mb .pps between 3 and
as of this occurance 6.8mb. I've got my procmail recipe for calling sa set to
3mb currently:
:0 fw : $ASSASSINLOCK
* < 3000000
| /usr/bin/spamc -f
will it be worth it to adjust upwards? This not a mail server but just a home
system with one user, me.
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
Re: 6.8mb spam
Posted by Chris <cp...@embarqmail.com>.
On Thursday 10 July 2008 9:05 pm, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 07:45:30PM -0500, Chris wrote:
> > :0 fw : $ASSASSINLOCK
> >
> > * < 3000000
> >
> > | /usr/bin/spamc -f
> >
> > will it be worth it to adjust upwards? This not a mail server but just a
> > home system with one user, me.
>
> The size limitation is useless, spamc has a smaller default limit.
>
> I wouldn't worry about a 7m spam, unless all (or at least a significant
> portion of) spams become that size.
Only 9 of 182 for this month are above 400k. So nothing to be concerned about
yet, thanks Theo.
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
Re: 6.8mb spam
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 07:45:30PM -0500, Chris wrote:
> :0 fw : $ASSASSINLOCK
> * < 3000000
> | /usr/bin/spamc -f
>
> will it be worth it to adjust upwards? This not a mail server but just a home
> system with one user, me.
The size limitation is useless, spamc has a smaller default limit.
I wouldn't worry about a 7m spam, unless all (or at least a significant
portion of) spams become that size.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
Leela: I'm sorry, but if it's fun in any way it's not environmentalism.
Paul: Oh, really? How about blowing up dams?
Re: 6.8mb spam
Posted by Michelle Konzack <li...@tamay-dogan.net>.
Hi chris,
Am 2008-07-10 19:45:30, schrieb Chris:
> Anyone seen these lately? The spam consists of a multi-mb .pps between 3 and
> as of this occurance 6.8mb. I've got my procmail recipe for calling sa set to
> 3mb currently:
Since you are calling spamassassin from procmail, I would not even allow
such messages coming into my system and catch them of the beginning of
the ~/.procmailrc
:0B
* ^application/(mspowerpoint|vnd.ms-powerpoint)
* > 2000000
.Spam.PowerPoint/
> :0 fw : $ASSASSINLOCK
> * < 3000000
> | /usr/bin/spamc -f
>
> will it be worth it to adjust upwards? This not a mail server but just a home
> system with one user, me.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
+49/177/9351947 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
+33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)