You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@arrow.apache.org by "Wes McKinney (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/04/20 00:44:04 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-860) [C++] Decide if typed Tensor subclasses are worthwhile

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15975819#comment-15975819 ] 

Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-860:
------------------------------------

PR: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/571

> [C++] Decide if typed Tensor subclasses are worthwhile
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-860
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-860
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: C++
>            Reporter: Wes McKinney
>            Assignee: Wes McKinney
>             Fix For: 0.3.0
>
>
> See discussion in https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/560. Since this is primarily a data container (only `arrow::Tensor` being used in Python, for example), and the subclasses are quite a bit of work to wrap, it's unclear whether they are of high value to maintain. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)