You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jena.apache.org by fr...@voila.fr on 2011/04/14 15:55:33 UTC
LARQ: what's the plan to cope with Lucene 3.x? [RE: ARQ + Lucene]
Hello Jenarous folks,
this is my 1st experience with this list & with all things ARQ & LARQ;
I've been sticking to published releases of TDB, 0.8.9 as of this writing,
& proceeding nice & smooth so far.
It's Lucene Java I have problems with, especially contribs,
& it would be a relief if I could move away from 2.9 towards 3.1.
Unfortunately, LARQ stumbles on backwards incompatibilities in Lucene 3.1,
which prevents me from just swapping the jars for the 2.9 ones in the TDB release.
Hence the question in the header of this mail.
I've seen a similar concerned raised here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jena-users/201103.mbox/%3CD6C1698BD2D9B342B7CE2AB63EF2C7B1019360E50F@VA3DIAXVS311.RED001.local%3E
So one month ago, the plan was to spin LARQ off into a separate module,
that would then be available dependent on Lucene 3.x;
are you still on this path? If so, what would be the the schedule?
Today, would you still give me the same advice you gave to Mr Abatzis;
to check LARQ out into dev from the SForge repository?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Best regards,
François Jurain.
____________________________________________________
Retrouvez toutes les astuces pour être belle et mince cet été sur http://actu.voila.fr/evenementiel/beaute-minceur2011/
Re: LARQ: what's the plan to cope with Lucene 3.x? [RE: ARQ + Lucene]
Posted by Paolo Castagna <ca...@googlemail.com>.
fr.jurain@voila.fr wrote:
> Hello Jenarous folks,
>
> this is my 1st experience with this list & with all things ARQ & LARQ;
> I've been sticking to published releases of TDB, 0.8.9 as of this writing,
> & proceeding nice & smooth so far.
>
> It's Lucene Java I have problems with, especially contribs,
> & it would be a relief if I could move away from 2.9 towards 3.1.
> Unfortunately, LARQ stumbles on backwards incompatibilities in Lucene 3.1,
> which prevents me from just swapping the jars for the 2.9 ones in the TDB release.
> Hence the question in the header of this mail.
>
> I've seen a similar concerned raised here:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jena-users/201103.mbox/%3CD6C1698BD2D9B342B7CE2AB63EF2C7B1019360E50F@VA3DIAXVS311.RED001.local%3E
> So one month ago, the plan was to spin LARQ off into a separate module,
> that would then be available dependent on Lucene 3.x;
> are you still on this path?
Yes, definitely.
LARQ source code as a separate module is here:
https://jena.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/jena/LARQ/trunk/
... and it will be migrated to the Apache SVN as soon as possible.
If you look at the pom.xml, you can see that now it depends on Lucene v3.0.3:
https://jena.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/jena/LARQ/trunk/pom.xml
Have you tried to upgrade from 3.0.3 to 3.1.x?
Did you experience problems?
> If so, what would be the the schedule?
Jena code has not been migrated to the Apache infrastructure yet
and there are external (to us) dependencies for this.
But, I would imagine we are very close to it, now.
When that happens, only minimal changes are necessary to ARQ to
use the separate LARQ module when present in the classpath.
LARQ will continue to depend on ARQ.
ARQ will not depend on LARQ (to avoid cyclic dependencies), but use it dynamically when present in the classpath.
Does this seem reasonable to you?
> Today, would you still give me the same advice you gave to Mr Abatzis;
> to check LARQ out into dev from the SForge repository?
You can find Maven artifacts here:
http://oss.talisplatform.com/content/repositories/talis-releases/org/apache/jena/larq/
http://oss.talisplatform.com/content/repositories/talis-snapshots/org/apache/jena/larq/
If you try using them, let me know if you have problems.
Paolo
>
> Thanks in advance for your help.
> Best regards,
> François Jurain.
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
>
> Retrouvez toutes les astuces pour être belle et mince cet été sur http://actu.voila.fr/evenementiel/beaute-minceur2011/
>
>
>
RE: LARQ: what's the plan to cope with Lucene 3.x? [RE: ARQ +
Lucene]
Posted by Nikolaos Abatzis <Ni...@newriversystems.com>.
Paolo,
The code changes I needed to do where necessitate by the move to Lucene 3.0.3, not from the use of the Apache LARQ
for example, changed
IndexReader.isLocked(luceneDirectory) --> IndexWriter.isLocked(LuceneDirectory),
Directory dir = new FSDirectory(lucenePath) --> dir = new SimpleFSDirectory(lucenePath),
etc.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need additional information. Thank you.
Regards,
Nikolaos Abatzis
New River Systems Corporation
1890 Preston White Drive, Suite 240
Reston, VA 20191
________________________________________
From: Paolo Castagna [castagna.lists@googlemail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 4:02 AM
To: jena-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: LARQ: what's the plan to cope with Lucene 3.x? [RE: ARQ + Lucene]
Nikolaos Abatzis wrote:
> Francois,
>
> I have gone down that path of getting and building larq and so far so good. So instead of importing the larq packages under com.hp.... I use the ones from org.apache.jena...
> We have also moved to lucene-core-3.0.3 which necessitated some changes in calls.
Hi Nikolaos,
are you using LARQ from trunk?
What "changes in calls" were necessary?
If there are necessary changes in the current LARQ trunk to use Lucene 3.0.3, please, let me know... since I don't see them.
> I did have to change some method calls to comply with the new
> Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need additional information. Thank you.
Or, share problems with us on the mailing list or JIRA so we can fix them for everybody:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA
Thanks,
Paolo
>
> Regards,
>
> Nikolaos Abatzis
> New River Systems Corporation
> 1890 Preston White Drive, Suite 240
> Reston, VA 20191
> ________________________________________
> From: fr.jurain@voila.fr [fr.jurain@voila.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 9:55 AM
> To: jena-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: LARQ: what's the plan to cope with Lucene 3.x? [RE: ARQ + Lucene]
>
> Hello Jenarous folks,
>
> this is my 1st experience with this list & with all things ARQ & LARQ;
> I've been sticking to published releases of TDB, 0.8.9 as of this writing,
> & proceeding nice & smooth so far.
>
> It's Lucene Java I have problems with, especially contribs,
> & it would be a relief if I could move away from 2.9 towards 3.1.
> Unfortunately, LARQ stumbles on backwards incompatibilities in Lucene 3.1,
> which prevents me from just swapping the jars for the 2.9 ones in the TDB release.
> Hence the question in the header of this mail.
>
> I've seen a similar concerned raised here:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jena-users/201103.mbox/%3CD6C1698BD2D9B342B7CE2AB63EF2C7B1019360E50F@VA3DIAXVS311.RED001.local%3E
> So one month ago, the plan was to spin LARQ off into a separate module,
> that would then be available dependent on Lucene 3.x;
> are you still on this path? If so, what would be the the schedule?
> Today, would you still give me the same advice you gave to Mr Abatzis;
> to check LARQ out into dev from the SForge repository?
>
> Thanks in advance for your help.
> Best regards,
> François Jurain.
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
>
> Retrouvez toutes les astuces pour être belle et mince cet été sur http://actu.voila.fr/evenementiel/beaute-minceur2011/
>
>
>
>
>
Re: LARQ: what's the plan to cope with Lucene 3.x? [RE: ARQ + Lucene]
Posted by Paolo Castagna <ca...@googlemail.com>.
Nikolaos Abatzis wrote:
> Francois,
>
> I have gone down that path of getting and building larq and so far so good. So instead of importing the larq packages under com.hp.... I use the ones from org.apache.jena...
> We have also moved to lucene-core-3.0.3 which necessitated some changes in calls.
Hi Nikolaos,
are you using LARQ from trunk?
What "changes in calls" were necessary?
If there are necessary changes in the current LARQ trunk to use Lucene 3.0.3, please, let me know... since I don't see them.
> I did have to change some method calls to comply with the new
> Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need additional information. Thank you.
Or, share problems with us on the mailing list or JIRA so we can fix them for everybody:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA
Thanks,
Paolo
>
> Regards,
>
> Nikolaos Abatzis
> New River Systems Corporation
> 1890 Preston White Drive, Suite 240
> Reston, VA 20191
> ________________________________________
> From: fr.jurain@voila.fr [fr.jurain@voila.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 9:55 AM
> To: jena-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: LARQ: what's the plan to cope with Lucene 3.x? [RE: ARQ + Lucene]
>
> Hello Jenarous folks,
>
> this is my 1st experience with this list & with all things ARQ & LARQ;
> I've been sticking to published releases of TDB, 0.8.9 as of this writing,
> & proceeding nice & smooth so far.
>
> It's Lucene Java I have problems with, especially contribs,
> & it would be a relief if I could move away from 2.9 towards 3.1.
> Unfortunately, LARQ stumbles on backwards incompatibilities in Lucene 3.1,
> which prevents me from just swapping the jars for the 2.9 ones in the TDB release.
> Hence the question in the header of this mail.
>
> I've seen a similar concerned raised here:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jena-users/201103.mbox/%3CD6C1698BD2D9B342B7CE2AB63EF2C7B1019360E50F@VA3DIAXVS311.RED001.local%3E
> So one month ago, the plan was to spin LARQ off into a separate module,
> that would then be available dependent on Lucene 3.x;
> are you still on this path? If so, what would be the the schedule?
> Today, would you still give me the same advice you gave to Mr Abatzis;
> to check LARQ out into dev from the SForge repository?
>
> Thanks in advance for your help.
> Best regards,
> François Jurain.
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
>
> Retrouvez toutes les astuces pour être belle et mince cet été sur http://actu.voila.fr/evenementiel/beaute-minceur2011/
>
>
>
>
>
RE: LARQ: what's the plan to cope with Lucene 3.x? [RE: ARQ +
Lucene]
Posted by Nikolaos Abatzis <Ni...@newriversystems.com>.
Francois,
I have gone down that path of getting and building larq and so far so good. So instead of importing the larq packages under com.hp.... I use the ones from org.apache.jena...
We have also moved to lucene-core-3.0.3 which necessitated some changes in calls.
I did have to change some method calls to comply with the new
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need additional information. Thank you.
Regards,
Nikolaos Abatzis
New River Systems Corporation
1890 Preston White Drive, Suite 240
Reston, VA 20191
________________________________________
From: fr.jurain@voila.fr [fr.jurain@voila.fr]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 9:55 AM
To: jena-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: LARQ: what's the plan to cope with Lucene 3.x? [RE: ARQ + Lucene]
Hello Jenarous folks,
this is my 1st experience with this list & with all things ARQ & LARQ;
I've been sticking to published releases of TDB, 0.8.9 as of this writing,
& proceeding nice & smooth so far.
It's Lucene Java I have problems with, especially contribs,
& it would be a relief if I could move away from 2.9 towards 3.1.
Unfortunately, LARQ stumbles on backwards incompatibilities in Lucene 3.1,
which prevents me from just swapping the jars for the 2.9 ones in the TDB release.
Hence the question in the header of this mail.
I've seen a similar concerned raised here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jena-users/201103.mbox/%3CD6C1698BD2D9B342B7CE2AB63EF2C7B1019360E50F@VA3DIAXVS311.RED001.local%3E
So one month ago, the plan was to spin LARQ off into a separate module,
that would then be available dependent on Lucene 3.x;
are you still on this path? If so, what would be the the schedule?
Today, would you still give me the same advice you gave to Mr Abatzis;
to check LARQ out into dev from the SForge repository?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Best regards,
François Jurain.
____________________________________________________
Retrouvez toutes les astuces pour être belle et mince cet été sur http://actu.voila.fr/evenementiel/beaute-minceur2011/