You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> on 2012/06/28 22:20:31 UTC
[VOTE] Release : Jena 2.7.2, Fuseki 0.2.3
Hi,
Here is a vote on a release build for Jena 2.7.2.
Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
(We do need at least 3 PMC +1's but the more it's tested, the better.)
This is a distribution of Jena (IRI, core, ARQ, TDB) and also of Fuseki.
The external dependencies are the same as for Jena 2.7.1.
Versions:
jena-parent 2
jena-iri 0.9.2
jena-core 2.7.2
jena-arq 2.9.2
jena-tdb 0.9.2
apache-jena 2.7.2 (the combined distribution)
jena-fuseki 0.2.3 (separate binary)
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/ent/repositories/orgapachejena-285/
Proposed dist/ area:
http://people.apache.org/~andy/Jena-2.7.2/dist/
Keys:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-2.7.2/
NB. This picks up jena-sdb and jena-larq as well. The source-release
does not; jena-sdb and jena-larq are not included in the build.
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
This vote will be open to the end of
Sunday, 1st July, 23:59 UTC
(72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC).
Andy
Checking needed:
does everything work on MS Windows?
does everything work on OS X?
is the GPG signature fine?
is there a source archive?
can the source archive really be built?
is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
(both source and binary artifacts)?
does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproducible sources?
Re: [VOTE] Release : Jena 2.7.2, Fuseki 0.2.3
Posted by Alex Hall <al...@revelytix.com>.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
>
+1
-Alex
Re: [] Release : Jena 2.7.2, Fuseki 0.2.3
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
> Unrelated:
>
> PS Jenkins is building version 2.7.1-SNAPSHOT, not 2.7.3-SNAPSHOT
> yesterday (as of 05:00 30/June)... something broken in the Jenkins setup
> leading to a stick workspace. I've wiped the state and it's rebuilding
> now.
>
> It would explain why the SPARQL update does not show.
We seem to be back to normal. At least, the Fuseki snapshot includes
the ARQ changes I put in yesterday around BIND.
I also cleared out all previous version snapshot, and the only ones now
are post-release versions (i.e. current SVN numbering) as the state of
each old one was indeterminate.
Let's hope it was the leap second.
Andy
Re: [] Release : Jena 2.7.2, Fuseki 0.2.3
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
> 10. are the Maven artifacts fine?
>
> https://repository.apache.org/ent/repositories/orgapachejena-285/
> This gave me a 404, but everything seems fine in the 'staging' repo here:
(typo)
Should be:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-285/
>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/jena/jena-core/2.7.2/
I didn't know that URL worked! It's the same material.
Andy
Unrelated:
PS Jenkins is building version 2.7.1-SNAPSHOT, not 2.7.3-SNAPSHOT
yesterday (as of 05:00 30/June)... something broken in the Jenkins setup
leading to a stick workspace. I've wiped the state and it's rebuilding now.
It would explain why the SPARQL update does not show.
>
> [ok]
>
> Thanks Andy.
>
> Paolo
>
Re: [VOTE] Release : Jena 2.7.2, Fuseki 0.2.3
Posted by Paolo Castagna <ca...@googlemail.com>.
Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
+1
Longer answer:
1. is the GPG signature fine?
wget http://people.apache.org/~andy/Jena-2.7.2/dist/binaries/apache-jena-2.7.2.tar.gz
wget http://people.apache.org/~andy/Jena-2.7.2/dist/binaries/apache-jena-2.7.2.tar.gz.asc
wget https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
gpg --import < KEYS
gpg --verify apache-jena-2.7.2.tar.gz.asc
[ok]
2. is there a source archive?
http://people.apache.org/~andy/Jena-2.7.2/dist/source/jena-2.7.2-source-release.zip
[ok]
3. can the source archive really be built?
wget http://people.apache.org/~andy/Jena-2.7.2/dist/source/jena-2.7.2-source-release.zip
unzip jena-2.7.2-source-release.zip
cd jena-2.7.2/
mvn clean package
[ok]
<skipped>
9. is there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproducible sources?
svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-2.7.2/ jena-2.7.2
cd jena-2.7.2/
mvn clean package
[ok]
10. are the Maven artifacts fine?
https://repository.apache.org/ent/repositories/orgapachejena-285/
This gave me a 404, but everything seems fine in the 'staging' repo here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/jena/jena-core/2.7.2/
[ok]
Thanks Andy.
Paolo
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release : Jena 2.7.2, Fuseki 0.2.3
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This vote will be open to the end of
>
> Sunday, 1st July, 23:59 UTC
>
> (72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC).
The vote passes:
+1 votes:
Rob Vesse
Stephen Allen
Alex Hall (non-binding)
Paolo Castagna
Andy Seaborne
and no 0 or -1 votes.
Pushing the release to the mirrors will be done ASAP.
Andy
Re: [VOTE] Release : Jena 2.7.2, Fuseki 0.2.3
Posted by Rob Vesse <rv...@yarcdata.com>.
+1
Rob
On 6/28/12 2:18 PM, "Andy Seaborne" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
>+1
>
> Andy
>
Re: [VOTE] Release : Jena 2.7.2, Fuseki 0.2.3
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
+1
Andy
Re: [VOTE] Release : Jena 2.7.2, Fuseki 0.2.3
Posted by Stephen Allen <sa...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Here is a vote on a release build for Jena 2.7.2.
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
+1
>
>
> Checking needed:
>
> does everything work on MS Windows?
Yes
> does everything work on OS X?
(not tested)
> is the GPG signature fine?
Yes
> is there a source archive?
Yes
> can the source archive really be built?
Yes
> is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
> (both source and binary artifacts)?
Yes
> does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
Yes
> if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproducible sources?
Yes