You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@opennlp.apache.org by Jeff Zemerick <jz...@apache.org> on 2023/01/11 15:29:44 UTC
Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release
Hi everyone,
Since the last release (2.1.0) back in November, we have had 56 closed Jira
tickets. Scrolling through them, I see lots of improvements to
documentation, Javadocs, tests, code quality, refactoring, and a few minor
fixes.
Because I don't see any new features, I would like to propose a release
vote for OpenNLP 2.1.1. I'm super excited that the project is in a position
to consider another release and a big thanks to everyone who contributed!
If I'm overlooking anything that would warrant a 2.2.0 release instead of
2.1.1 please let me know! Here's the Jira query for the current changes in
2.1.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1320?jql=project%20%3D%20OPENNLP%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
Let me know what you think!
Thanks,
Jeff
Re: Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release
Posted by Martin Wiesner <ma...@apache.org>.
Hi Jeff et al.,
here's my +1 on releasing "2.1.1" soon.
Maybe, we can include the PR for OPENNLP-1441 I opened minutes ago.
If something quality-related should be left in order to get out a consistent release, please let me know or open a Jira. I'll see what I can contribute.
IMHO, the "Logging" topic (see other thread on the dev list) might be a part of the next release (2.1.2 or 2.2.0). I would, in any case, be open for having this change in 2.1.1 as well; I'll leave it to @rzo1 and others to draft and decide when to target this.
Best
Martin
--
On 2023/01/11 17:49:19 Richard Zowalla wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I am a big +1 for a release.
>
> There are some (minor) method signature in it (correcting typos,
> removing methods, changing visibility, ...), so it won't be a drop-in
> replacement for some users as they need to adjust code.
>
> If we are fine to ship these changes in a patch version (and not in a
> new minor version), we can go with 2.1.1
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, dem 11.01.2023 um 10:29 -0500 schrieb Jeff Zemerick:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Since the last release (2.1.0) back in November, we have had 56
> > closed Jira
> > tickets. Scrolling through them, I see lots of improvements to
> > documentation, Javadocs, tests, code quality, refactoring, and a few
> > minor
> > fixes.
> >
> > Because I don't see any new features, I would like to propose a
> > release
> > vote for OpenNLP 2.1.1. I'm super excited that the project is in a
> > position
> > to consider another release and a big thanks to everyone who
> > contributed!
> >
> > If I'm overlooking anything that would warrant a 2.2.0 release
> > instead of
> > 2.1.1 please let me know! Here's the Jira query for the current
> > changes in
> > 2.1.1:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1320?jql=project%20%3D%20OPENNLP%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> >
> > Let me know what you think!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jeff
>
>
Re: Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release
Posted by Martin Wiesner <ma...@apache.org>.
+1
On 2023/01/23 17:16:33 Jeff Zemerick wrote:
> If there aren't any objections, I will plan to make a 2.1.1 RC1 and start
> the release vote this week with what's currently in the main branch.
>
> It looks like the only outstanding PR is to add logging and it will be good
> for a 2.2.0 release.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:51 PM Bruno Kinoshita <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Good point on the breaking changes. Maybe a 2.2 with an introductory
> > paragraph in the announcement email & in the changelog about these breaking
> > changes?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Bruno
> >
> > On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 18:49, Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jeff,
> > >
> > > I am a big +1 for a release.
> > >
> > > There are some (minor) method signature in it (correcting typos,
> > > removing methods, changing visibility, ...), so it won't be a drop-in
> > > replacement for some users as they need to adjust code.
> > >
> > > If we are fine to ship these changes in a patch version (and not in a
> > > new minor version), we can go with 2.1.1
> > >
> > > Gruß
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Am Mittwoch, dem 11.01.2023 um 10:29 -0500 schrieb Jeff Zemerick:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Since the last release (2.1.0) back in November, we have had 56
> > > > closed Jira
> > > > tickets. Scrolling through them, I see lots of improvements to
> > > > documentation, Javadocs, tests, code quality, refactoring, and a few
> > > > minor
> > > > fixes.
> > > >
> > > > Because I don't see any new features, I would like to propose a
> > > > release
> > > > vote for OpenNLP 2.1.1. I'm super excited that the project is in a
> > > > position
> > > > to consider another release and a big thanks to everyone who
> > > > contributed!
> > > >
> > > > If I'm overlooking anything that would warrant a 2.2.0 release
> > > > instead of
> > > > 2.1.1 please let me know! Here's the Jira query for the current
> > > > changes in
> > > > 2.1.1:
> > > >
> > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1320?jql=project%20%3D%20OPENNLP%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > > >
> > > > Let me know what you think!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jeff
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release
Posted by Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org>.
+1
Am Montag, dem 23.01.2023 um 12:16 -0500 schrieb Jeff Zemerick:
> If there aren't any objections, I will plan to make a 2.1.1 RC1 and
> start
> the release vote this week with what's currently in the main branch.
>
> It looks like the only outstanding PR is to add logging and it will
> be good
> for a 2.2.0 release.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:51 PM Bruno Kinoshita <ki...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Good point on the breaking changes. Maybe a 2.2 with an
> > introductory
> > paragraph in the announcement email & in the changelog about these
> > breaking
> > changes?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Bruno
> >
> > On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 18:49, Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jeff,
> > >
> > > I am a big +1 for a release.
> > >
> > > There are some (minor) method signature in it (correcting typos,
> > > removing methods, changing visibility, ...), so it won't be a
> > > drop-in
> > > replacement for some users as they need to adjust code.
> > >
> > > If we are fine to ship these changes in a patch version (and not
> > > in a
> > > new minor version), we can go with 2.1.1
> > >
> > > Gruß
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Am Mittwoch, dem 11.01.2023 um 10:29 -0500 schrieb Jeff Zemerick:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Since the last release (2.1.0) back in November, we have had 56
> > > > closed Jira
> > > > tickets. Scrolling through them, I see lots of improvements to
> > > > documentation, Javadocs, tests, code quality, refactoring, and
> > > > a few
> > > > minor
> > > > fixes.
> > > >
> > > > Because I don't see any new features, I would like to propose a
> > > > release
> > > > vote for OpenNLP 2.1.1. I'm super excited that the project is
> > > > in a
> > > > position
> > > > to consider another release and a big thanks to everyone who
> > > > contributed!
> > > >
> > > > If I'm overlooking anything that would warrant a 2.2.0 release
> > > > instead of
> > > > 2.1.1 please let me know! Here's the Jira query for the current
> > > > changes in
> > > > 2.1.1:
> > > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1320?jql=project%20%3D%20OPENNLP%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > > > Let me know what you think!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jeff
Re: Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release
Posted by Jeff Zemerick <jz...@apache.org>.
If there aren't any objections, I will plan to make a 2.1.1 RC1 and start
the release vote this week with what's currently in the main branch.
It looks like the only outstanding PR is to add logging and it will be good
for a 2.2.0 release.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:51 PM Bruno Kinoshita <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> Good point on the breaking changes. Maybe a 2.2 with an introductory
> paragraph in the announcement email & in the changelog about these breaking
> changes?
>
> Cheers
> Bruno
>
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 18:49, Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> > I am a big +1 for a release.
> >
> > There are some (minor) method signature in it (correcting typos,
> > removing methods, changing visibility, ...), so it won't be a drop-in
> > replacement for some users as they need to adjust code.
> >
> > If we are fine to ship these changes in a patch version (and not in a
> > new minor version), we can go with 2.1.1
> >
> > Gruß
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, dem 11.01.2023 um 10:29 -0500 schrieb Jeff Zemerick:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Since the last release (2.1.0) back in November, we have had 56
> > > closed Jira
> > > tickets. Scrolling through them, I see lots of improvements to
> > > documentation, Javadocs, tests, code quality, refactoring, and a few
> > > minor
> > > fixes.
> > >
> > > Because I don't see any new features, I would like to propose a
> > > release
> > > vote for OpenNLP 2.1.1. I'm super excited that the project is in a
> > > position
> > > to consider another release and a big thanks to everyone who
> > > contributed!
> > >
> > > If I'm overlooking anything that would warrant a 2.2.0 release
> > > instead of
> > > 2.1.1 please let me know! Here's the Jira query for the current
> > > changes in
> > > 2.1.1:
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1320?jql=project%20%3D%20OPENNLP%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > >
> > > Let me know what you think!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jeff
> >
> >
>
Re: Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release
Posted by Bruno Kinoshita <ki...@apache.org>.
Good point on the breaking changes. Maybe a 2.2 with an introductory
paragraph in the announcement email & in the changelog about these breaking
changes?
Cheers
Bruno
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 18:49, Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I am a big +1 for a release.
>
> There are some (minor) method signature in it (correcting typos,
> removing methods, changing visibility, ...), so it won't be a drop-in
> replacement for some users as they need to adjust code.
>
> If we are fine to ship these changes in a patch version (and not in a
> new minor version), we can go with 2.1.1
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, dem 11.01.2023 um 10:29 -0500 schrieb Jeff Zemerick:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Since the last release (2.1.0) back in November, we have had 56
> > closed Jira
> > tickets. Scrolling through them, I see lots of improvements to
> > documentation, Javadocs, tests, code quality, refactoring, and a few
> > minor
> > fixes.
> >
> > Because I don't see any new features, I would like to propose a
> > release
> > vote for OpenNLP 2.1.1. I'm super excited that the project is in a
> > position
> > to consider another release and a big thanks to everyone who
> > contributed!
> >
> > If I'm overlooking anything that would warrant a 2.2.0 release
> > instead of
> > 2.1.1 please let me know! Here's the Jira query for the current
> > changes in
> > 2.1.1:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1320?jql=project%20%3D%20OPENNLP%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> >
> > Let me know what you think!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jeff
>
>
Re: Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release
Posted by Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org>.
Hi Jeff,
I am a big +1 for a release.
There are some (minor) method signature in it (correcting typos,
removing methods, changing visibility, ...), so it won't be a drop-in
replacement for some users as they need to adjust code.
If we are fine to ship these changes in a patch version (and not in a
new minor version), we can go with 2.1.1
Gruß
Richard
Am Mittwoch, dem 11.01.2023 um 10:29 -0500 schrieb Jeff Zemerick:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Since the last release (2.1.0) back in November, we have had 56
> closed Jira
> tickets. Scrolling through them, I see lots of improvements to
> documentation, Javadocs, tests, code quality, refactoring, and a few
> minor
> fixes.
>
> Because I don't see any new features, I would like to propose a
> release
> vote for OpenNLP 2.1.1. I'm super excited that the project is in a
> position
> to consider another release and a big thanks to everyone who
> contributed!
>
> If I'm overlooking anything that would warrant a 2.2.0 release
> instead of
> 2.1.1 please let me know! Here's the Jira query for the current
> changes in
> 2.1.1:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1320?jql=project%20%3D%20OPENNLP%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
>
> Let me know what you think!
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
Re: Thoughts on an Apache OpenNLP 2.1.1 release
Posted by Bruno Kinoshita <ki...@apache.org>.
We are getting a lot of great contributions, and the sooner we release it
the better IMO, to get it out to be tested and to get feedback, as well as
create a milestone for further work.
So +1!
Thanks Jeff
Bruno
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 16:31, Jeff Zemerick <jz...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Since the last release (2.1.0) back in November, we have had 56 closed Jira
> tickets. Scrolling through them, I see lots of improvements to
> documentation, Javadocs, tests, code quality, refactoring, and a few minor
> fixes.
>
> Because I don't see any new features, I would like to propose a release
> vote for OpenNLP 2.1.1. I'm super excited that the project is in a position
> to consider another release and a big thanks to everyone who contributed!
>
> If I'm overlooking anything that would warrant a 2.2.0 release instead of
> 2.1.1 please let me know! Here's the Jira query for the current changes in
> 2.1.1:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1320?jql=project%20%3D%20OPENNLP%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
>
> Let me know what you think!
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>