You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by "Justin SB (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/09/08 02:52:52 UTC

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-1050) Support for "no data loss" mode

Justin SB created KAFKA-1050:
--------------------------------

             Summary: Support for "no data loss" mode
                 Key: KAFKA-1050
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1050
             Project: Kafka
          Issue Type: Task
            Reporter: Justin SB


I'd love to use Apache Kafka, but for my application data loss is not acceptable.  Even at the expense of availability (i.e. I need C not A in CAP).

I think there are two things that I need to change to get a quorum model:

1) Make sure I set request.required.acks to 2 (for a 3 node cluster) or 3 (for a 5 node cluster) on every request, so that I can only write if a quorum is active.

2) Prevent the behaviour where a non-ISR can become the leader if all ISRs die.  I think this is as easy as tweaking core/src/main/scala/kafka/controller/PartitionLeaderSelector.scala, essentially to throw an exception around line 64 in the "data loss" case.

I haven't yet implemented / tested this.  I'd love to get some input from the Kafka-experts on whether my plan is:
 (a) correct - will this work?
 (b) complete - have I missed any cases?
 (c) recommended - is this a terrible idea :-)

Thanks for any pointers!

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira