You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@etch.apache.org by Michael Fitzner <Mi...@bmw-carit.de> on 2011/12/12 18:17:39 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Hello,
We created all the release artifacts for the upcoming 1.2 release of Apache Etch.
All files are currently placed in the following directory at
https://people.apache.org/~fitzner/apache-etch-1.2.0-incubating-rc1/
Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the README.txt and
BUILD.txt files.
Please vote for this release package:
[ ] +1 Accept; release looks good
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't accept the release because of...
This vote will run for 72 hours.
Thanks for your votes,
Michael
Martin
Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Posted by scott comer <we...@mac.com>.
> There are a lot of IDE files in the distro, and a lot of .gitignore
> files. You might want to remove those, or at least consolidate the
> .gitignore files.
just curious, we've heard that before. but why? why not put in our distro?
if we were using maven, they'd be automatically generated, since we're
not, then we need them to make working easier.
scott out
Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1
I generated and checked the RAT report, and it didn't seem to contain
any wrong licenses.
There are a lot of IDE files in the distro, and a lot of .gitignore
files. You might want to remove those, or at least consolidate the
.gitignore files.
Martijn
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Michael Fitzner
<fi...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Scott,We have seen the issues from Thomas. After the 1.2 release we
> will work on the issues and try to fix those up to the next bug fixing
> release.
> @Martijn I think for publishing the release we still need a vote from
> one of our mentors. It would be great if you could still have a look
> to it.
> ThanksMichael
> 2011/12/16 Scott Comer <we...@me.com>:
>> I haven't tried the unix distro yet, but don't expect any issue. Thomas had posted a number of bugs, some critical, with fixes i wish could be included, but would rather see a release out.
>>
>> We're now using c binding successfully in two projects.
>>
>> +1 on release
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Dec 16, 2011, at 7:40 AM, Martin Veith <Ma...@bmw-carit.de> wrote:
>>
>>>> I call out the build issue because in my experience the build issue is a big mental hurdle to getting started.
>>> I fully agree with you.
>>>
>>>> Everything should be spelled out in the readme / ant file there in the example directory. Lovely as it is, wiki is far away.
>>> At the moment the dist-Readme.txt in each example folder of the source bundle (which corresponds to the Readme.txt of the binary packages) contains the information about the required .NET 4.0 Framework and the description how to build the C example using CMake.
>>> What in your opinion is still missing?
>>>
>>>> I did figure out the .net 4.0 part.
>>>>
>>>> Two lines in the read me, one for ant cmake and one for the .net on my path would have saved a lot of grief
>>> So is everything now working on your machine? Is there something we should improve or fix for this release or is it ok for you to publish it as it is?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Scott Comer [mailto:wert1y@me.com]
>>> Sent: Freitag, 16. Dezember 2011 13:17
>>> To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>
>>> I call out the build issue because in my experience the build issue is a big mental hurdle to getting started. Everything should be spelled out in the readme / ant file there in the example directory. Lovely as it is, wiki is far away.
>>>
>>> I did figure out the .net 4.0 part.
>>>
>>> Two lines in the read me, one for ant cmake and one for the .net on my path would have saved a lot of grief
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Dec 16, 2011, at 3:22 AM, Martin Veith <Ma...@bmw-carit.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Scott,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for your reply.
>>>>
>>>>> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should
>>>>> be called out?
>>>>> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
>>>>> validate?
>>>> According to http://apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#sha-checksum the use of SHA-1 should be avoided.
>>>> Therefore we used SHA512. We will add this note to the download page of the website as soon as the release is out.
>>>> Information and examples hot to verify the release signatures and check sums can be found on the website too.
>>>>
>>>>> the ant build of example\helloworld works.
>>>>> the java version of example\helloworld works.
>>>>> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error
>>>>> code.
>>>> Since the integration of the UDP Transport layer the C# build has had dependencies to the .NET 4.0 framework.
>>>> In order to build the examples the location of the framework must be in your path.
>>>> This information is also available in the Readme file of each example.
>>>> Maybe that's the reason of your obscure error?
>>>>
>>>> As this dependency to .NET 4.0 is caused only by a used implementation of a BlockingQueue we are thinking about to eliminate this for the next release and so come back to .NET 2.0 compatibility.
>>>>
>>>>> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should
>>>>> be.
>>>> As in the previous 1.1.0-release C examples are only available for example_mixin and helloworld.
>>>> The C examples are not build by the ant build script in the binary releases because we don't ship the ant-cmake library.
>>>> Therefore you have to call cmake manually as described in the Readme file too.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: scott comer [mailto:wert1y@mac.com]
>>>> Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 22:05
>>>> To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>>
>>>> because of the no c version of examples, i vote:
>>>>
>>>> -1
>>>>
>>>> scott
>>>>
>>>> On 12/15/2011 2:52 PM, scott comer wrote:
>>>>> trying on windows 7 with java 1.6.0_29 and ant 1.7.1:
>>>>>
>>>>> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should
>>>>> be called out?
>>>>>
>>>>> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
>>>>> validate?
>>>>>
>>>>> installation verified.
>>>>>
>>>>> the ant build of example\helloworld works.
>>>>> the java version of example\helloworld works.
>>>>> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error
>>>>> code.
>>>>>
>>>>> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should
>>>>> be.
>>>>>
>>>>> scott out
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/15/2011 7:54 AM, Michael Fitzner wrote:
>>>>>> I checked also the release package for Windows 7. It looks good so far.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so +1 from my side
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is with all the other PPMC and Committers? Could you please
>>>>>> review it!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>>> Von: Martin Veith [mailto:Martin.Veith@bmw-carit.de]
>>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 09:49
>>>>>> An:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Betreff: RE: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 from me
>>>>>> SHA512 and MD5 checksums look good, signatures are valid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Michael Fitzner [mailto:Michael.Fitzner@bmw-carit.de]
>>>>>> Sent: Montag, 12. Dezember 2011 18:18
>>>>>> To:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We created all the release artifacts for the upcoming 1.2 release of
>>>>>> Apache Etch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All files are currently placed in the following directory at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://people.apache.org/~fitzner/apache-etch-1.2.0-incubating-rc1/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the
>>>>>> README.txt and
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BUILD.txt files.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote for this release package:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Accept; release looks good
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't accept the release because of...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This vote will run for 72 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for your votes,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Posted by Michael Fitzner <fi...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Scott,We have seen the issues from Thomas. After the 1.2 release we
will work on the issues and try to fix those up to the next bug fixing
release.
@Martijn I think for publishing the release we still need a vote from
one of our mentors. It would be great if you could still have a look
to it.
ThanksMichael
2011/12/16 Scott Comer <we...@me.com>:
> I haven't tried the unix distro yet, but don't expect any issue. Thomas had posted a number of bugs, some critical, with fixes i wish could be included, but would rather see a release out.
>
> We're now using c binding successfully in two projects.
>
> +1 on release
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 16, 2011, at 7:40 AM, Martin Veith <Ma...@bmw-carit.de> wrote:
>
>>> I call out the build issue because in my experience the build issue is a big mental hurdle to getting started.
>> I fully agree with you.
>>
>>> Everything should be spelled out in the readme / ant file there in the example directory. Lovely as it is, wiki is far away.
>> At the moment the dist-Readme.txt in each example folder of the source bundle (which corresponds to the Readme.txt of the binary packages) contains the information about the required .NET 4.0 Framework and the description how to build the C example using CMake.
>> What in your opinion is still missing?
>>
>>> I did figure out the .net 4.0 part.
>>>
>>> Two lines in the read me, one for ant cmake and one for the .net on my path would have saved a lot of grief
>> So is everything now working on your machine? Is there something we should improve or fix for this release or is it ok for you to publish it as it is?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Scott Comer [mailto:wert1y@me.com]
>> Sent: Freitag, 16. Dezember 2011 13:17
>> To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>
>> I call out the build issue because in my experience the build issue is a big mental hurdle to getting started. Everything should be spelled out in the readme / ant file there in the example directory. Lovely as it is, wiki is far away.
>>
>> I did figure out the .net 4.0 part.
>>
>> Two lines in the read me, one for ant cmake and one for the .net on my path would have saved a lot of grief
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Dec 16, 2011, at 3:22 AM, Martin Veith <Ma...@bmw-carit.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Scott,
>>>
>>> thanks for your reply.
>>>
>>>> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should
>>>> be called out?
>>>> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
>>>> validate?
>>> According to http://apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#sha-checksum the use of SHA-1 should be avoided.
>>> Therefore we used SHA512. We will add this note to the download page of the website as soon as the release is out.
>>> Information and examples hot to verify the release signatures and check sums can be found on the website too.
>>>
>>>> the ant build of example\helloworld works.
>>>> the java version of example\helloworld works.
>>>> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error
>>>> code.
>>> Since the integration of the UDP Transport layer the C# build has had dependencies to the .NET 4.0 framework.
>>> In order to build the examples the location of the framework must be in your path.
>>> This information is also available in the Readme file of each example.
>>> Maybe that's the reason of your obscure error?
>>>
>>> As this dependency to .NET 4.0 is caused only by a used implementation of a BlockingQueue we are thinking about to eliminate this for the next release and so come back to .NET 2.0 compatibility.
>>>
>>>> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should
>>>> be.
>>> As in the previous 1.1.0-release C examples are only available for example_mixin and helloworld.
>>> The C examples are not build by the ant build script in the binary releases because we don't ship the ant-cmake library.
>>> Therefore you have to call cmake manually as described in the Readme file too.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: scott comer [mailto:wert1y@mac.com]
>>> Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 22:05
>>> To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>
>>> because of the no c version of examples, i vote:
>>>
>>> -1
>>>
>>> scott
>>>
>>> On 12/15/2011 2:52 PM, scott comer wrote:
>>>> trying on windows 7 with java 1.6.0_29 and ant 1.7.1:
>>>>
>>>> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should
>>>> be called out?
>>>>
>>>> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
>>>> validate?
>>>>
>>>> installation verified.
>>>>
>>>> the ant build of example\helloworld works.
>>>> the java version of example\helloworld works.
>>>> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error
>>>> code.
>>>>
>>>> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should
>>>> be.
>>>>
>>>> scott out
>>>>
>>>> On 12/15/2011 7:54 AM, Michael Fitzner wrote:
>>>>> I checked also the release package for Windows 7. It looks good so far.
>>>>>
>>>>> so +1 from my side
>>>>>
>>>>> What is with all the other PPMC and Committers? Could you please
>>>>> review it!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Michael
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>> Von: Martin Veith [mailto:Martin.Veith@bmw-carit.de]
>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 09:49
>>>>> An:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Betreff: RE: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 from me
>>>>> SHA512 and MD5 checksums look good, signatures are valid.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Martin
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Michael Fitzner [mailto:Michael.Fitzner@bmw-carit.de]
>>>>> Sent: Montag, 12. Dezember 2011 18:18
>>>>> To:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We created all the release artifacts for the upcoming 1.2 release of
>>>>> Apache Etch.
>>>>>
>>>>> All files are currently placed in the following directory at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://people.apache.org/~fitzner/apache-etch-1.2.0-incubating-rc1/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the
>>>>> README.txt and
>>>>>
>>>>> BUILD.txt files.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote for this release package:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Accept; release looks good
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't accept the release because of...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This vote will run for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your votes,
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Posted by Scott Comer <we...@me.com>.
I haven't tried the unix distro yet, but don't expect any issue. Thomas had posted a number of bugs, some critical, with fixes i wish could be included, but would rather see a release out.
We're now using c binding successfully in two projects.
+1 on release
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 16, 2011, at 7:40 AM, Martin Veith <Ma...@bmw-carit.de> wrote:
>> I call out the build issue because in my experience the build issue is a big mental hurdle to getting started.
> I fully agree with you.
>
>> Everything should be spelled out in the readme / ant file there in the example directory. Lovely as it is, wiki is far away.
> At the moment the dist-Readme.txt in each example folder of the source bundle (which corresponds to the Readme.txt of the binary packages) contains the information about the required .NET 4.0 Framework and the description how to build the C example using CMake.
> What in your opinion is still missing?
>
>> I did figure out the .net 4.0 part.
>>
>> Two lines in the read me, one for ant cmake and one for the .net on my path would have saved a lot of grief
> So is everything now working on your machine? Is there something we should improve or fix for this release or is it ok for you to publish it as it is?
>
> Thanks
> Martin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Comer [mailto:wert1y@me.com]
> Sent: Freitag, 16. Dezember 2011 13:17
> To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>
> I call out the build issue because in my experience the build issue is a big mental hurdle to getting started. Everything should be spelled out in the readme / ant file there in the example directory. Lovely as it is, wiki is far away.
>
> I did figure out the .net 4.0 part.
>
> Two lines in the read me, one for ant cmake and one for the .net on my path would have saved a lot of grief
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 16, 2011, at 3:22 AM, Martin Veith <Ma...@bmw-carit.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> thanks for your reply.
>>
>>> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should
>>> be called out?
>>> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
>>> validate?
>> According to http://apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#sha-checksum the use of SHA-1 should be avoided.
>> Therefore we used SHA512. We will add this note to the download page of the website as soon as the release is out.
>> Information and examples hot to verify the release signatures and check sums can be found on the website too.
>>
>>> the ant build of example\helloworld works.
>>> the java version of example\helloworld works.
>>> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error
>>> code.
>> Since the integration of the UDP Transport layer the C# build has had dependencies to the .NET 4.0 framework.
>> In order to build the examples the location of the framework must be in your path.
>> This information is also available in the Readme file of each example.
>> Maybe that's the reason of your obscure error?
>>
>> As this dependency to .NET 4.0 is caused only by a used implementation of a BlockingQueue we are thinking about to eliminate this for the next release and so come back to .NET 2.0 compatibility.
>>
>>> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should
>>> be.
>> As in the previous 1.1.0-release C examples are only available for example_mixin and helloworld.
>> The C examples are not build by the ant build script in the binary releases because we don't ship the ant-cmake library.
>> Therefore you have to call cmake manually as described in the Readme file too.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martin
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: scott comer [mailto:wert1y@mac.com]
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 22:05
>> To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>
>> because of the no c version of examples, i vote:
>>
>> -1
>>
>> scott
>>
>> On 12/15/2011 2:52 PM, scott comer wrote:
>>> trying on windows 7 with java 1.6.0_29 and ant 1.7.1:
>>>
>>> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should
>>> be called out?
>>>
>>> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
>>> validate?
>>>
>>> installation verified.
>>>
>>> the ant build of example\helloworld works.
>>> the java version of example\helloworld works.
>>> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error
>>> code.
>>>
>>> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should
>>> be.
>>>
>>> scott out
>>>
>>> On 12/15/2011 7:54 AM, Michael Fitzner wrote:
>>>> I checked also the release package for Windows 7. It looks good so far.
>>>>
>>>> so +1 from my side
>>>>
>>>> What is with all the other PPMC and Committers? Could you please
>>>> review it!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>> Von: Martin Veith [mailto:Martin.Veith@bmw-carit.de]
>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 09:49
>>>> An:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Betreff: RE: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>>
>>>> +1 from me
>>>> SHA512 and MD5 checksums look good, signatures are valid.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Michael Fitzner [mailto:Michael.Fitzner@bmw-carit.de]
>>>> Sent: Montag, 12. Dezember 2011 18:18
>>>> To:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We created all the release artifacts for the upcoming 1.2 release of
>>>> Apache Etch.
>>>>
>>>> All files are currently placed in the following directory at
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://people.apache.org/~fitzner/apache-etch-1.2.0-incubating-rc1/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the
>>>> README.txt and
>>>>
>>>> BUILD.txt files.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please vote for this release package:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Accept; release looks good
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>>>>
>>>> [ ] -1 Don't accept the release because of...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This vote will run for 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your votes,
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>
RE: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Posted by Martin Veith <Ma...@bmw-carit.de>.
> I call out the build issue because in my experience the build issue is a big mental hurdle to getting started.
I fully agree with you.
> Everything should be spelled out in the readme / ant file there in the example directory. Lovely as it is, wiki is far away.
At the moment the dist-Readme.txt in each example folder of the source bundle (which corresponds to the Readme.txt of the binary packages) contains the information about the required .NET 4.0 Framework and the description how to build the C example using CMake.
What in your opinion is still missing?
> I did figure out the .net 4.0 part.
>
> Two lines in the read me, one for ant cmake and one for the .net on my path would have saved a lot of grief
So is everything now working on your machine? Is there something we should improve or fix for this release or is it ok for you to publish it as it is?
Thanks
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Comer [mailto:wert1y@me.com]
Sent: Freitag, 16. Dezember 2011 13:17
To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
I call out the build issue because in my experience the build issue is a big mental hurdle to getting started. Everything should be spelled out in the readme / ant file there in the example directory. Lovely as it is, wiki is far away.
I did figure out the .net 4.0 part.
Two lines in the read me, one for ant cmake and one for the .net on my path would have saved a lot of grief
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 16, 2011, at 3:22 AM, Martin Veith <Ma...@bmw-carit.de> wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> thanks for your reply.
>
>> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should
>> be called out?
>> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
>> validate?
> According to http://apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#sha-checksum the use of SHA-1 should be avoided.
> Therefore we used SHA512. We will add this note to the download page of the website as soon as the release is out.
> Information and examples hot to verify the release signatures and check sums can be found on the website too.
>
>> the ant build of example\helloworld works.
>> the java version of example\helloworld works.
>> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error
>> code.
> Since the integration of the UDP Transport layer the C# build has had dependencies to the .NET 4.0 framework.
> In order to build the examples the location of the framework must be in your path.
> This information is also available in the Readme file of each example.
> Maybe that's the reason of your obscure error?
>
> As this dependency to .NET 4.0 is caused only by a used implementation of a BlockingQueue we are thinking about to eliminate this for the next release and so come back to .NET 2.0 compatibility.
>
>> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should
>> be.
> As in the previous 1.1.0-release C examples are only available for example_mixin and helloworld.
> The C examples are not build by the ant build script in the binary releases because we don't ship the ant-cmake library.
> Therefore you have to call cmake manually as described in the Readme file too.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: scott comer [mailto:wert1y@mac.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 22:05
> To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>
> because of the no c version of examples, i vote:
>
> -1
>
> scott
>
> On 12/15/2011 2:52 PM, scott comer wrote:
>> trying on windows 7 with java 1.6.0_29 and ant 1.7.1:
>>
>> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should
>> be called out?
>>
>> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
>> validate?
>>
>> installation verified.
>>
>> the ant build of example\helloworld works.
>> the java version of example\helloworld works.
>> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error
>> code.
>>
>> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should
>> be.
>>
>> scott out
>>
>> On 12/15/2011 7:54 AM, Michael Fitzner wrote:
>>> I checked also the release package for Windows 7. It looks good so far.
>>>
>>> so +1 from my side
>>>
>>> What is with all the other PPMC and Committers? Could you please
>>> review it!
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: Martin Veith [mailto:Martin.Veith@bmw-carit.de]
>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 09:49
>>> An:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Betreff: RE: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>
>>> +1 from me
>>> SHA512 and MD5 checksums look good, signatures are valid.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Michael Fitzner [mailto:Michael.Fitzner@bmw-carit.de]
>>> Sent: Montag, 12. Dezember 2011 18:18
>>> To:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We created all the release artifacts for the upcoming 1.2 release of
>>> Apache Etch.
>>>
>>> All files are currently placed in the following directory at
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://people.apache.org/~fitzner/apache-etch-1.2.0-incubating-rc1/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the
>>> README.txt and
>>>
>>> BUILD.txt files.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote for this release package:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Accept; release looks good
>>>
>>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>>>
>>> [ ] -1 Don't accept the release because of...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This vote will run for 72 hours.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your votes,
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> Martin
>>
>>
>
Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Posted by Scott Comer <we...@me.com>.
I call out the build issue because in my experience the build issue is a big mental hurdle to getting started. Everything should be spelled out in the readme / ant file there in the example directory. Lovely as it is, wiki is far away.
I did figure out the .net 4.0 part.
Two lines in the read me, one for ant cmake and one for the .net on my path would have saved a lot of grief
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 16, 2011, at 3:22 AM, Martin Veith <Ma...@bmw-carit.de> wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> thanks for your reply.
>
>> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should
>> be called out?
>> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
>> validate?
> According to http://apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#sha-checksum the use of SHA-1 should be avoided.
> Therefore we used SHA512. We will add this note to the download page of the website as soon as the release is out.
> Information and examples hot to verify the release signatures and check sums can be found on the website too.
>
>> the ant build of example\helloworld works.
>> the java version of example\helloworld works.
>> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error
>> code.
> Since the integration of the UDP Transport layer the C# build has had dependencies to the .NET 4.0 framework.
> In order to build the examples the location of the framework must be in your path.
> This information is also available in the Readme file of each example.
> Maybe that's the reason of your obscure error?
>
> As this dependency to .NET 4.0 is caused only by a used implementation of a BlockingQueue we are thinking about to eliminate this for the next release and so come back to .NET 2.0 compatibility.
>
>> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should
>> be.
> As in the previous 1.1.0-release C examples are only available for example_mixin and helloworld.
> The C examples are not build by the ant build script in the binary releases because we don't ship the ant-cmake library.
> Therefore you have to call cmake manually as described in the Readme file too.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: scott comer [mailto:wert1y@mac.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 22:05
> To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>
> because of the no c version of examples, i vote:
>
> -1
>
> scott
>
> On 12/15/2011 2:52 PM, scott comer wrote:
>> trying on windows 7 with java 1.6.0_29 and ant 1.7.1:
>>
>> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should
>> be called out?
>>
>> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
>> validate?
>>
>> installation verified.
>>
>> the ant build of example\helloworld works.
>> the java version of example\helloworld works.
>> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error
>> code.
>>
>> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should
>> be.
>>
>> scott out
>>
>> On 12/15/2011 7:54 AM, Michael Fitzner wrote:
>>> I checked also the release package for Windows 7. It looks good so far.
>>>
>>> so +1 from my side
>>>
>>> What is with all the other PPMC and Committers? Could you please
>>> review it!
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: Martin Veith [mailto:Martin.Veith@bmw-carit.de]
>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 09:49
>>> An:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Betreff: RE: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>
>>> +1 from me
>>> SHA512 and MD5 checksums look good, signatures are valid.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Michael Fitzner [mailto:Michael.Fitzner@bmw-carit.de]
>>> Sent: Montag, 12. Dezember 2011 18:18
>>> To:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We created all the release artifacts for the upcoming 1.2 release of
>>> Apache Etch.
>>>
>>> All files are currently placed in the following directory at
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://people.apache.org/~fitzner/apache-etch-1.2.0-incubating-rc1/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the
>>> README.txt and
>>>
>>> BUILD.txt files.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote for this release package:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Accept; release looks good
>>>
>>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>>>
>>> [ ] -1 Don't accept the release because of...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This vote will run for 72 hours.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your votes,
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> Martin
>>
>>
>
RE: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Posted by Martin Veith <Ma...@bmw-carit.de>.
Hi Scott,
thanks for your reply.
> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should
> be called out?
> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
> validate?
According to http://apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#sha-checksum the use of SHA-1 should be avoided.
Therefore we used SHA512. We will add this note to the download page of the website as soon as the release is out.
Information and examples hot to verify the release signatures and check sums can be found on the website too.
> the ant build of example\helloworld works.
> the java version of example\helloworld works.
> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error
> code.
Since the integration of the UDP Transport layer the C# build has had dependencies to the .NET 4.0 framework.
In order to build the examples the location of the framework must be in your path.
This information is also available in the Readme file of each example.
Maybe that's the reason of your obscure error?
As this dependency to .NET 4.0 is caused only by a used implementation of a BlockingQueue we are thinking about to eliminate this for the next release and so come back to .NET 2.0 compatibility.
> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should
> be.
As in the previous 1.1.0-release C examples are only available for example_mixin and helloworld.
The C examples are not build by the ant build script in the binary releases because we don't ship the ant-cmake library.
Therefore you have to call cmake manually as described in the Readme file too.
Cheers,
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: scott comer [mailto:wert1y@mac.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 22:05
To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
because of the no c version of examples, i vote:
-1
scott
On 12/15/2011 2:52 PM, scott comer wrote:
> trying on windows 7 with java 1.6.0_29 and ant 1.7.1:
>
> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should
> be called out?
>
> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
> validate?
>
> installation verified.
>
> the ant build of example\helloworld works.
> the java version of example\helloworld works.
> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error
> code.
>
> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should
> be.
>
> scott out
>
> On 12/15/2011 7:54 AM, Michael Fitzner wrote:
>> I checked also the release package for Windows 7. It looks good so far.
>>
>> so +1 from my side
>>
>> What is with all the other PPMC and Committers? Could you please
>> review it!
>>
>> Thanks
>> Michael
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Martin Veith [mailto:Martin.Veith@bmw-carit.de]
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 09:49
>> An:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Betreff: RE: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>
>> +1 from me
>> SHA512 and MD5 checksums look good, signatures are valid.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martin
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael Fitzner [mailto:Michael.Fitzner@bmw-carit.de]
>> Sent: Montag, 12. Dezember 2011 18:18
>> To:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> We created all the release artifacts for the upcoming 1.2 release of
>> Apache Etch.
>>
>> All files are currently placed in the following directory at
>>
>>
>>
>> https://people.apache.org/~fitzner/apache-etch-1.2.0-incubating-rc1/
>>
>>
>>
>> Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the
>> README.txt and
>>
>> BUILD.txt files.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please vote for this release package:
>>
>>
>>
>> [ ] +1 Accept; release looks good
>>
>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>>
>> [ ] -1 Don't accept the release because of...
>>
>>
>>
>> This vote will run for 72 hours.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your votes,
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> Martin
>
>
Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Posted by scott comer <we...@mac.com>.
because of the no c version of examples, i vote:
-1
scott
On 12/15/2011 2:52 PM, scott comer wrote:
> trying on windows 7 with java 1.6.0_29 and ant 1.7.1:
>
> in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should
> be called out?
>
> perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
> validate?
>
> installation verified.
>
> the ant build of example\helloworld works.
> the java version of example\helloworld works.
> the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error
> code.
>
> there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should
> be.
>
> scott out
>
> On 12/15/2011 7:54 AM, Michael Fitzner wrote:
>> I checked also the release package for Windows 7. It looks good so far.
>>
>> so +1 from my side
>>
>> What is with all the other PPMC and Committers? Could you please
>> review it!
>>
>> Thanks
>> Michael
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Martin Veith [mailto:Martin.Veith@bmw-carit.de]
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 09:49
>> An:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Betreff: RE: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>
>> +1 from me
>> SHA512 and MD5 checksums look good, signatures are valid.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martin
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael Fitzner [mailto:Michael.Fitzner@bmw-carit.de]
>> Sent: Montag, 12. Dezember 2011 18:18
>> To:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> We created all the release artifacts for the upcoming 1.2 release of
>> Apache Etch.
>>
>> All files are currently placed in the following directory at
>>
>>
>>
>> https://people.apache.org/~fitzner/apache-etch-1.2.0-incubating-rc1/
>>
>>
>>
>> Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the
>> README.txt and
>>
>> BUILD.txt files.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please vote for this release package:
>>
>>
>>
>> [ ] +1 Accept; release looks good
>>
>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>>
>> [ ] -1 Don't accept the release because of...
>>
>>
>>
>> This vote will run for 72 hours.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your votes,
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> Martin
>
>
Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Posted by scott comer <we...@mac.com>.
trying on windows 7 with java 1.6.0_29 and ant 1.7.1:
in the past the sha was a sha1. now is a sha512. perhaps that should be
called out?
perhaps a README.txt in the artifacts directory telling folks how to
validate?
installation verified.
the ant build of example\helloworld works.
the java version of example\helloworld works.
the c# version of example\helloworld doesn't work. obscure .net error code.
there is no c version of example\helloworld. i'm thinking there should be.
scott out
On 12/15/2011 7:54 AM, Michael Fitzner wrote:
> I checked also the release package for Windows 7. It looks good so far.
>
> so +1 from my side
>
> What is with all the other PPMC and Committers? Could you please review it!
>
> Thanks
> Michael
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Martin Veith [mailto:Martin.Veith@bmw-carit.de]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 09:49
> An:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: RE: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>
> +1 from me
> SHA512 and MD5 checksums look good, signatures are valid.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Fitzner [mailto:Michael.Fitzner@bmw-carit.de]
> Sent: Montag, 12. Dezember 2011 18:18
> To:etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We created all the release artifacts for the upcoming 1.2 release of Apache Etch.
>
> All files are currently placed in the following directory at
>
>
>
> https://people.apache.org/~fitzner/apache-etch-1.2.0-incubating-rc1/
>
>
>
> Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the README.txt and
>
> BUILD.txt files.
>
>
>
> Please vote for this release package:
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 Accept; release looks good
>
> [ ] +0 Don't care
>
> [ ] -1 Don't accept the release because of...
>
>
>
> This vote will run for 72 hours.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your votes,
>
> Michael
>
> Martin
Re: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Posted by "Youngjin Park (youngjpa)" <yo...@cisco.com>.
+1
Thanks
Youngjin
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Fitzner [mailto:Michael.Fitzner@bmw-carit.de]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 05:54 AM
To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org <et...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
I checked also the release package for Windows 7. It looks good so far.
so +1 from my side
What is with all the other PPMC and Committers? Could you please review it!
Thanks
Michael
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Martin Veith [mailto:Martin.Veith@bmw-carit.de]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 09:49
An: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: RE: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
+1 from me
SHA512 and MD5 checksums look good, signatures are valid.
Cheers,
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Fitzner [mailto:Michael.Fitzner@bmw-carit.de]
Sent: Montag, 12. Dezember 2011 18:18
To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Hello,
We created all the release artifacts for the upcoming 1.2 release of Apache Etch.
All files are currently placed in the following directory at
https://people.apache.org/~fitzner/apache-etch-1.2.0-incubating-rc1/
Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the README.txt and
BUILD.txt files.
Please vote for this release package:
[ ] +1 Accept; release looks good
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't accept the release because of...
This vote will run for 72 hours.
Thanks for your votes,
Michael
Martin
AW: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Posted by Michael Fitzner <Mi...@bmw-carit.de>.
I checked also the release package for Windows 7. It looks good so far.
so +1 from my side
What is with all the other PPMC and Committers? Could you please review it!
Thanks
Michael
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Martin Veith [mailto:Martin.Veith@bmw-carit.de]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011 09:49
An: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: RE: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
+1 from me
SHA512 and MD5 checksums look good, signatures are valid.
Cheers,
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Fitzner [mailto:Michael.Fitzner@bmw-carit.de]
Sent: Montag, 12. Dezember 2011 18:18
To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Hello,
We created all the release artifacts for the upcoming 1.2 release of Apache Etch.
All files are currently placed in the following directory at
https://people.apache.org/~fitzner/apache-etch-1.2.0-incubating-rc1/
Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the README.txt and
BUILD.txt files.
Please vote for this release package:
[ ] +1 Accept; release looks good
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't accept the release because of...
This vote will run for 72 hours.
Thanks for your votes,
Michael
Martin
RE: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Posted by Martin Veith <Ma...@bmw-carit.de>.
+1 from me
SHA512 and MD5 checksums look good, signatures are valid.
Cheers,
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Fitzner [mailto:Michael.Fitzner@bmw-carit.de]
Sent: Montag, 12. Dezember 2011 18:18
To: etch-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Etch 1.2 release packages
Hello,
We created all the release artifacts for the upcoming 1.2 release of Apache Etch.
All files are currently placed in the following directory at
https://people.apache.org/~fitzner/apache-etch-1.2.0-incubating-rc1/
Instructions for building the source packages can be found in the README.txt and
BUILD.txt files.
Please vote for this release package:
[ ] +1 Accept; release looks good
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't accept the release because of...
This vote will run for 72 hours.
Thanks for your votes,
Michael
Martin