You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@xalan.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2001/09/02 04:20:34 UTC
[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3266]
Contention on ClassLoader due to XPath?
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3266
*** shadow/3266 Fri Aug 24 15:29:36 2001
--- shadow/3266.tmp.9645 Sat Sep 1 19:20:33 2001
***************
*** 2,9 ****
| Contention on ClassLoader due to XPath? |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bug #: 3266 Product: XalanJ2 |
! | Status: NEW Version: 2.1.0 |
! | Resolution: Platform: PC |
| Severity: Enhancement OS/Version: Other |
| Priority: Other Component: org.apache.xalan.extens |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--- 2,9 ----
| Contention on ClassLoader due to XPath? |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bug #: 3266 Product: XalanJ2 |
! | Status: RESOLVED Version: 2.1.0 |
! | Resolution: INVALID Platform: PC |
| Severity: Enhancement OS/Version: Other |
| Priority: Other Component: org.apache.xalan.extens |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
***************
*** 26,29 ****
Is this absolutely necessary? Can it be bypassed?
Thanks,
! Glenn
--- 26,35 ----
Is this absolutely necessary? Can it be bypassed?
Thanks,
! Glenn
!
! ------- Additional Comments From garyp@firstech.com 2001-09-01 19:20 -------
! After further discussion on the Xalan-dev list, we determined that
! the "contention" was showing up in a debugger that involved the obtaining of a
! monitor by the Sun system ClassLoader. There is no evidence that this was the
! cause of any multi-thread problems in XalanJ.