You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@felix.apache.org by Roland <wg...@ids.de> on 2013/10/09 13:37:02 UTC
Re: Apache Felix and OSGI R5
hello Felix-experts,
I am looking for informations about whether or how much of the Subsystems
specification and Common Namespaces Specification is implemented in Apache
Felix.
Thanks und Regards,
Roland
--
View this message in context: http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/Apache-Felix-and-OSGI-R5-tp5004939p5005459.html
Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: Apache Felix and OSGI R5
Posted by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi Roland,
See here for some instructions on how I got it working at the time:
http://coderthoughts.blogspot.com/2013/04/osgi-subsystems.html
Cheers,
David
On 10 October 2013 07:32, Roland <wg...@ids.de> wrote:
> Hi,
> hey nice...This means that I can use the Aries subsystem bundles without
> Aries Application.
>
> Thanks!!!!
> Roland
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/Apache-Felix-and-OSGI-R5-tp5004939p5005482.html
> Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: Apache Felix and OSGI R5
Posted by Roland <wg...@ids.de>.
Hi,
hey nice...This means that I can use the Aries subsystem bundles without
Aries Application.
Thanks!!!!
Roland
--
View this message in context: http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/Apache-Felix-and-OSGI-R5-tp5004939p5005482.html
Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: Apache Felix and OSGI R5
Posted by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>.
On 9 October 2013 16:48, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
> On 10/9/13 11:23 , CLEMENT Jean-Philippe wrote:
>>
>> I guess this is not the issue. From my understanding, Aries in itself is
>> already too heavy for him and he would like the "Subsystems specification
>> and Common Namespaces Specification" implementation alone.
>
>
> Ah. I would have assumed that the implementation from Aries would be usable
> independently from anything else in Aries...if not, then I see.
When I looked at it last the implementation in Aries had the following
bundles/dependencies:
org.apache.aries.subsystem.api_1.0.0
org.apache.aries.subsystem.core_1.0.0
org.apache.aries.subsystem.obr_1.0.0
org.apache.aries.application.api_1.0.0
org.apache.aries.application.modeller_1.0.0
org.apache.aries.application.utils_1.0.0
org.apache.aries.blueprint_1.1.0
org.apache.aries.proxy_1.0.1
org.apache.aries.util_1.1.0
org.apache.felix.bundlerepository_1.6.6
org.apache.felix.resolver_1.0.0
org.eclipse.equinox.coordinator_1.1.0.v20120522-1841
org.eclipse.equinox.region_1.1.0.v20120522-1841
slf4j.api_1.7.5
slf4j.simple_1.7.5
So while it has a number of dependencies, it certainly doesn't depend
on everything in Aries...
Cheers,
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: Apache Felix and OSGI R5
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 10/9/13 11:23 , CLEMENT Jean-Philippe wrote:
> I guess this is not the issue. From my understanding, Aries in itself is already too heavy for him and he would like the "Subsystems specification and Common Namespaces Specification" implementation alone.
Ah. I would have assumed that the implementation from Aries would be
usable independently from anything else in Aries...if not, then I see.
-> richard
>
> Don't know if it makes sense...
>
> JP
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Richard S. Hall [mailto:heavy@ungoverned.org]
> Envoyé : mercredi 9 octobre 2013 14:32
> À : users@felix.apache.org
> Objet : Re: Apache Felix and OSGI R5
>
> On 10/9/13 08:07 , Roland wrote:
>> Hi,
>> thanks for your reply. I am asking because I do not want to obtain
>> additional overhead by the integration of Apache Aries (concerning the
>> starttime). I need a very lightweight implemention.
> What makes you think an implementation at Felix would be any lighter weight?
>
> This is not something integrated into the framework, it is an externally implemented piece of functionality. Just like any bundle. The weight of the implementation is purely dependent on implementation choices and not in which project it originated.
>
> -> richard
>
>> Regards
>> Roland
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/Apache-Felix-and-OSGI-R5-tp500
>> 4939p5005462.html Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list
>> archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
RE: Apache Felix and OSGI R5
Posted by CLEMENT Jean-Philippe <je...@fr.thalesgroup.com>.
I guess this is not the issue. From my understanding, Aries in itself is already too heavy for him and he would like the "Subsystems specification and Common Namespaces Specification" implementation alone.
Don't know if it makes sense...
JP
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Richard S. Hall [mailto:heavy@ungoverned.org]
Envoyé : mercredi 9 octobre 2013 14:32
À : users@felix.apache.org
Objet : Re: Apache Felix and OSGI R5
On 10/9/13 08:07 , Roland wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for your reply. I am asking because I do not want to obtain
> additional overhead by the integration of Apache Aries (concerning the
> starttime). I need a very lightweight implemention.
What makes you think an implementation at Felix would be any lighter weight?
This is not something integrated into the framework, it is an externally implemented piece of functionality. Just like any bundle. The weight of the implementation is purely dependent on implementation choices and not in which project it originated.
-> richard
> Regards
> Roland
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/Apache-Felix-and-OSGI-R5-tp500
> 4939p5005462.html Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list
> archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: Apache Felix and OSGI R5
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 10/9/13 08:07 , Roland wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for your reply. I am asking because I do not want to obtain
> additional overhead by the integration of Apache Aries (concerning the
> starttime). I need a very lightweight implemention.
What makes you think an implementation at Felix would be any lighter weight?
This is not something integrated into the framework, it is an externally
implemented piece of functionality. Just like any bundle. The weight of
the implementation is purely dependent on implementation choices and not
in which project it originated.
-> richard
> Regards
> Roland
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/Apache-Felix-and-OSGI-R5-tp5004939p5005462.html
> Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: Apache Felix and OSGI R5
Posted by Roland <wg...@ids.de>.
Hi,
thanks for your reply. I am asking because I do not want to obtain
additional overhead by the integration of Apache Aries (concerning the
starttime). I need a very lightweight implemention.
Regards
Roland
--
View this message in context: http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/Apache-Felix-and-OSGI-R5-tp5004939p5005462.html
Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: Apache Felix and OSGI R5
Posted by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi Roland,
There is a Subsystems spec implementation at Apache Aries [1]. I wrote
a little getting started blog post about it a few months back [2].
Cheers,
David
[1] http://aries.apache.org
[2] http://coderthoughts.blogspot.ie/2013/04/osgi-subsystems.html
On 9 October 2013 12:37, Roland <wg...@ids.de> wrote:
> hello Felix-experts,
> I am looking for informations about whether or how much of the Subsystems
> specification and Common Namespaces Specification is implemented in Apache
> Felix.
>
> Thanks und Regards,
> Roland
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/Apache-Felix-and-OSGI-R5-tp5004939p5005459.html
> Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org