You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hive.apache.org by "David Mollitor (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/06/11 17:03:00 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (HIVE-21636) Performance cost when using replaceAll() vs replace()

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-21636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

David Mollitor reassigned HIVE-21636:
-------------------------------------

    Assignee: bd2019us

> Performance cost when using replaceAll() vs replace() 
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-21636
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-21636
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Accumulo Storage Handler, HCatalog, Vectorization
>            Reporter: bd2019us
>            Assignee: bd2019us
>            Priority: Trivial
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: HVIE-21636.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Use String.replace() instead of String.replaceAll() when replaceAll() does not use a regex
> replace() does not need extra compilation / performance overhead when a non-regex string is used. Thus changing replaceAll() to replace() can remove the associated performance overhead.
> Affected files:
> # accumulo-handler/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/accumulo/predicate/compare/StringCompare.java
> # hcatalog/core/src/main/java/org/apache/hive/hcatalog/mapreduce/FileOutputCommitterContainer.java
> # vector-code-gen/src/org/apache/hadoop/hive/tools/GenVectorCode.java



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)