You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@yunikorn.apache.org by "Anthony Wu (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/10/12 00:30:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (YUNIKORN-1347) Yunikorn triggers EKS auto-scaling when pods have surpassed the queue limit

Anthony Wu created YUNIKORN-1347:
------------------------------------

             Summary: Yunikorn triggers EKS auto-scaling when pods have surpassed the queue limit 
                 Key: YUNIKORN-1347
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-1347
             Project: Apache YuniKorn
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: core - scheduler, shim - kubernetes
            Reporter: Anthony Wu


Hi guys,

We are trying to utilise Yunikorn to manage our AWS EKS infrastructure to limit resource usage for different users and groups. We also use k8s cluster auto-scaler ([https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/tree/master/cluster-autoscaler]) for auto scaling of the cluster when necessary.

*Environment*
 * AWS EKS on k8s 1.21
 * Yunikorn 1.1 running as k8s scheduler plugin to be most compatible
 * cluster-autoscaler V1.21.0

*Issues*:

Let's say we have quene has be below limit
{code:yaml}
queues:               
- name: dev
  submitacl: "*"
  resources:
    max: 
      memory: 100Gi
      vcore: 10 
{code}
 

Then we try to create 4 pods in the `dev` queue each requires 5 cores and 50Gi memory

Then we are getting 2 pods {{Running}} and 2 pods {{Pending}}, because the queue has reached its limit of 10Gi memory and 10 cpus.

We would expect the queued pods to not triggering EKS auto scaling, as they would not be able to be allocated until other resources have been release in the queue. 

But what we see is that, the Queued pods still trigger the cluster auto-scaling regardless. As shown in the example below:

{code:java}
Status:       Pending
...
Conditions:
  Type           Status
  PodScheduled   False
Events:
  Type     Reason            Age    From                Message
  ----     ------            ----   ----                -------
  Warning  FailedScheduling  3m5s   yunikorn            0/147 nodes are available: 147 Pod is not ready for scheduling.
  Warning  FailedScheduling  3m5s   yunikorn            0/147 nodes are available: 147 Pod is not ready for scheduling.
  Normal   Scheduling        3m3s   yunikorn            yunikorn/dask-user-07ff5f3b-8qjkl8 is queued and waiting for allocation
  Normal   TriggeredScaleUp  2m53s  cluster-autoscaler  pod triggered scale-up: [{eksctl-cluster-nodegroup-spot-xlarge-compute-1-NodeGroup-8VURTD4WKCYV 0->4 (max: 16)}]
{code}

So eventually, EKS auto-added some hosts but not actually been used and allocated as the pods are not approved to be scheduled yet.

We also tried Gang scheduling with the pods in a task group, but it is also having similar issues: Even the whole gang is not ready to schedule, Yunikorn creates the place-holder pods which triggers auto-scaling of EKS cluster

*Causes and potential solutions*
We tried to look at both source code in the auto-scaler and Yunikorn, and we think the reason is just that the auto-scaler does not know about Yunikorn specific events and state (Pending but not QuotaApproved) of a Pod. It searches all the Pods with `PodScheduled=False` to then check whether it needs to add resources for them.

The issue could be resolved from both side:
- To solve from auto-scaler side, it needs to know the special events and state of Yunikorn
- To solve from Yunikorn side, I think it needs to not create the pod unless it is quota approved - not sure how hard to achieve this
   - as long as a pod is created, it goes to Pending and the auto-scaler will try to pick it up

We think solving it from Yunikron side would be cleaner, since auto-scaler should not need to know the k8s scheduler implementation in order to make a decision. Also there are other auto-scaler alternatives like AWS Karpenter could suffers the same issue when interact with Yunikorn.

Wondering whether this issue report make sense to you guys. Let us know if there are any other solutions and whether it is possible to be solved in future :)

Thanks a lot!
 

 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@yunikorn.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@yunikorn.apache.org