You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@accumulo.apache.org by Michael Berman <mb...@sqrrl.com> on 2013/11/06 21:36:42 UTC
Review requests on dev@
I recently posted a review for ACCUMULO-1009 (
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15245/), and I added the accumulo group as a
reviewer, but that email went to the old incubator list (as noted by
others). It doesn't look to me like it came through to the real dev
list...is there something special I have to do to get reviews posted here?
Re: Review requests on dev@
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6971
On 11/6/13, 3:44 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> a committer should file a INFRA ticket to fix the group to point at
> dev@accumulo instead of the incubator list.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Michael Berman <mb...@sqrrl.com> wrote:
>
>> I recently posted a review for ACCUMULO-1009 (
>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/15245/), and I added the accumulo group as a
>> reviewer, but that email went to the old incubator list (as noted by
>> others). It doesn't look to me like it came through to the real dev
>> list...is there something special I have to do to get reviews posted here?
>>
>
>
>
Re: Review requests on dev@
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@clouderagovt.com>.
a committer should file a INFRA ticket to fix the group to point at
dev@accumulo instead of the incubator list.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Michael Berman <mb...@sqrrl.com> wrote:
> I recently posted a review for ACCUMULO-1009 (
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/15245/), and I added the accumulo group as a
> reviewer, but that email went to the old incubator list (as noted by
> others). It doesn't look to me like it came through to the real dev
> list...is there something special I have to do to get reviews posted here?
>
--
Sean
Re: Review requests on dev@
Posted by Michael Berman <mb...@sqrrl.com>.
Oh awesome, thanks for the confirmation that it actually went through,
Billie. I have so much trouble figuring out how to distinguish message
copies in gmail.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Weird. I was seeing them go to dev@a.a.o.
>
> But one of Bill Havanki's reviews that came directly to me is also going
> to accumulo-dev@.i.a.o
>
>
> On 11/6/13, 4:04 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
>
>> The one I got today was from Michael Berman and contained the text
>> "created
>> new review created so I get responses instead of Vines".
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:53 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> That was the original I submitted while Berman was at Strata. I asked him
>>> to resubmit to he could manage the patch.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Billie Rinaldi <billie.rinaldi@gmail.com
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> I received the review via the dev list with subject "Re: Review Request
>>>> 15245: ACCUMULO-1009 - add use of SSL for thrift comms (was
>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/14972/)" at approximately 9:57 am ET.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Michael Berman <mb...@sqrrl.com>
>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I recently posted a review for ACCUMULO-1009 (
>>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/15245/), and I added the accumulo group
>>>>>
>>>> as
>>>
>>>> a
>>>>
>>>>> reviewer, but that email went to the old incubator list (as noted by
>>>>> others). It doesn't look to me like it came through to the real dev
>>>>> list...is there something special I have to do to get reviews posted
>>>>>
>>>> here?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Review requests on dev@
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Weird. I was seeing them go to dev@a.a.o.
But one of Bill Havanki's reviews that came directly to me is also going
to accumulo-dev@.i.a.o
On 11/6/13, 4:04 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
> The one I got today was from Michael Berman and contained the text "created
> new review created so I get responses instead of Vines".
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:53 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> That was the original I submitted while Berman was at Strata. I asked him
>> to resubmit to he could manage the patch.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Billie Rinaldi <billie.rinaldi@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> I received the review via the dev list with subject "Re: Review Request
>>> 15245: ACCUMULO-1009 - add use of SSL for thrift comms (was
>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/14972/)" at approximately 9:57 am ET.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Michael Berman <mb...@sqrrl.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I recently posted a review for ACCUMULO-1009 (
>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/15245/), and I added the accumulo group
>> as
>>> a
>>>> reviewer, but that email went to the old incubator list (as noted by
>>>> others). It doesn't look to me like it came through to the real dev
>>>> list...is there something special I have to do to get reviews posted
>>> here?
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Review requests on dev@
Posted by Billie Rinaldi <bi...@gmail.com>.
The one I got today was from Michael Berman and contained the text "created
new review created so I get responses instead of Vines".
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:53 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> That was the original I submitted while Berman was at Strata. I asked him
> to resubmit to he could manage the patch.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Billie Rinaldi <billie.rinaldi@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I received the review via the dev list with subject "Re: Review Request
> > 15245: ACCUMULO-1009 - add use of SSL for thrift comms (was
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/14972/)" at approximately 9:57 am ET.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Michael Berman <mb...@sqrrl.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I recently posted a review for ACCUMULO-1009 (
> > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/15245/), and I added the accumulo group
> as
> > a
> > > reviewer, but that email went to the old incubator list (as noted by
> > > others). It doesn't look to me like it came through to the real dev
> > > list...is there something special I have to do to get reviews posted
> > here?
> > >
> >
>
Re: Review requests on dev@
Posted by John Vines <vi...@apache.org>.
That was the original I submitted while Berman was at Strata. I asked him
to resubmit to he could manage the patch.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Billie Rinaldi <bi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I received the review via the dev list with subject "Re: Review Request
> 15245: ACCUMULO-1009 - add use of SSL for thrift comms (was
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/14972/)" at approximately 9:57 am ET.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Michael Berman <mb...@sqrrl.com> wrote:
>
> > I recently posted a review for ACCUMULO-1009 (
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/15245/), and I added the accumulo group as
> a
> > reviewer, but that email went to the old incubator list (as noted by
> > others). It doesn't look to me like it came through to the real dev
> > list...is there something special I have to do to get reviews posted
> here?
> >
>
Re: Review requests on dev@
Posted by Billie Rinaldi <bi...@gmail.com>.
I received the review via the dev list with subject "Re: Review Request
15245: ACCUMULO-1009 - add use of SSL for thrift comms (was
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14972/)" at approximately 9:57 am ET.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Michael Berman <mb...@sqrrl.com> wrote:
> I recently posted a review for ACCUMULO-1009 (
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/15245/), and I added the accumulo group as a
> reviewer, but that email went to the old incubator list (as noted by
> others). It doesn't look to me like it came through to the real dev
> list...is there something special I have to do to get reviews posted here?
>