You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com> on 2021/11/29 15:18:48 UTC

[HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20 release tomorrow

I'm thinking about cutting an ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20.0 tomorrow.

Let me know If anyone has anything that would like to be included ...
I will merge some PRs today..but please let me know here of anything
that needs to be included and I can hold accordingly to accomodate any
PRs or JIRAs.

I want to make sure we release with ARTEMIS-3587 fixed. hence why I
decided to do one sooner.

-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20 release tomorrow

Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
The repo is already tagged.  Feel free to push anything you like again.

I will organize the vote thread  and send it out shortly.



On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 4:40 PM Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I had test failures because of
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3853#issuecomment-993567992
>
> I'm pushing the release for the Wed...
>
> please lets not push anything big on main between today and tomorrow..
> (small fixes are ok.. but if you have anything big please hold on
> pushing on main for a day)...
>
>
> I may wait for a re-send from
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3853... although it
> will be optional (depending if it's fixed before tomorrow or not).
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 9:27 AM Ryan Yeats
> <ry...@octoconsulting.com> wrote:
> >
> > I would like ARTEMIS-3596 in, I know you have reservations because I was
> building off of origin/master which has itest issues, but it passes itests
> now that it is rebased off origin/main.
> >
> > Ryan Yeats
> >
> > On 12/14/21, 7:02 AM, "Clebert Suconic" <cl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >     a bit late than what I promised but I'm cutting it today...
> >
> >     On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:18 AM Clebert Suconic
> >     <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >     >
> >     > I'm thinking about cutting an ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20.0 tomorrow.
> >     >
> >     > Let me know If anyone has anything that would like to be included
> ...
> >     > I will merge some PRs today..but please let me know here of
> anything
> >     > that needs to be included and I can hold accordingly to accomodate
> any
> >     > PRs or JIRAs.
> >     >
> >     > I want to make sure we release with ARTEMIS-3587 fixed. hence why I
> >     > decided to do one sooner.
> >     >
> >     > --
> >     > Clebert Suconic
> >
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     Clebert Suconic
> >
> > [Octo | Jump the Technology Curve.]<https://www.octoconsulting.com/>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>
-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20 release tomorrow

Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
I had test failures because of
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3853#issuecomment-993567992

I'm pushing the release for the Wed...

please lets not push anything big on main between today and tomorrow..
(small fixes are ok.. but if you have anything big please hold on
pushing on main for a day)...


I may wait for a re-send from
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3853... although it
will be optional (depending if it's fixed before tomorrow or not).

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 9:27 AM Ryan Yeats
<ry...@octoconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> I would like ARTEMIS-3596 in, I know you have reservations because I was building off of origin/master which has itest issues, but it passes itests now that it is rebased off origin/main.
>
> Ryan Yeats
>
> On 12/14/21, 7:02 AM, "Clebert Suconic" <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     a bit late than what I promised but I'm cutting it today...
>
>     On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:18 AM Clebert Suconic
>     <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>     >
>     > I'm thinking about cutting an ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20.0 tomorrow.
>     >
>     > Let me know If anyone has anything that would like to be included ...
>     > I will merge some PRs today..but please let me know here of anything
>     > that needs to be included and I can hold accordingly to accomodate any
>     > PRs or JIRAs.
>     >
>     > I want to make sure we release with ARTEMIS-3587 fixed. hence why I
>     > decided to do one sooner.
>     >
>     > --
>     > Clebert Suconic
>
>
>
>     --
>     Clebert Suconic
>
> [Octo | Jump the Technology Curve.]<https://www.octoconsulting.com/>



--
Clebert Suconic

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20 release tomorrow

Posted by Ryan Yeats <ry...@octoconsulting.com>.
I would like ARTEMIS-3596 in, I know you have reservations because I was building off of origin/master which has itest issues, but it passes itests now that it is rebased off origin/main.

Ryan Yeats

On 12/14/21, 7:02 AM, "Clebert Suconic" <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:

    a bit late than what I promised but I'm cutting it today...

    On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:18 AM Clebert Suconic
    <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > I'm thinking about cutting an ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20.0 tomorrow.
    >
    > Let me know If anyone has anything that would like to be included ...
    > I will merge some PRs today..but please let me know here of anything
    > that needs to be included and I can hold accordingly to accomodate any
    > PRs or JIRAs.
    >
    > I want to make sure we release with ARTEMIS-3587 fixed. hence why I
    > decided to do one sooner.
    >
    > --
    > Clebert Suconic



    --
    Clebert Suconic

[Octo | Jump the Technology Curve.]<https://www.octoconsulting.com/>

Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20 release tomorrow

Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
a bit late than what I promised but I'm cutting it today...

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:18 AM Clebert Suconic
<cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm thinking about cutting an ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20.0 tomorrow.
>
> Let me know If anyone has anything that would like to be included ...
> I will merge some PRs today..but please let me know here of anything
> that needs to be included and I can hold accordingly to accomodate any
> PRs or JIRAs.
>
> I want to make sure we release with ARTEMIS-3587 fixed. hence why I
> decided to do one sooner.
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic