You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bigtop.apache.org by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> on 2011/11/23 00:28:51 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Bigtop 0.3.0: target release date, supported platforms,
bill of materials
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 02:37PM, Bruno MahИ wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 02:24 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > Please vote on the proposed content for 0.3.0 release. The vote will
> > close on Sunday 11/27/11 11:59pm PST. Please limit this thread to
> > +1/-1 (with explanation).
> >
> > Release date:
> > * Mid-end Jan 2012
> >
> > Supported platforms (no change from 0.2.0):
> > * CentOS 6
> > * Ubuntu LTS Lucid 10.04
> > * OpenSUSE 11.4
> > * Fedora 15
> >
> > Proposed bill of materials:
> > * HCatalog 0.2.0 (new, must have)
> > * Sqoop 1.4 (new, best effort)
> > * Zookeeper 3.4 (upgrade, must have)
> > * Hadoop 0.20.205.1 (upgrade, must have)
> > * HBase 0.92 (upgrade, must have)
> > * Oozie 3.1.2 (upgrade, best effort)
> > * Whirr 0.6.0 (upgrade, best effort)
> > * Hive 0.8.0 (upgrade, best effort)
> > * Pig 0.9.1
> > * Mahout 0.5
> > * Flume 0.9.3
>
> -1
>
> 1/ Latest openSUSE and Fedora are respectively 12.1 and 16
> 2/ We should move trunk to Apache Hadoop 0.23 before January. By then a
> few projects should have fixed their compatibility issue with Apache
> Hadoop enabling us to push for a release with more than just Hadoop 0.23.
> 3/ I thought we would base releases based on a ~ quaterly schedule and
> not features.
-1 on the Bruno: our trunk shouldn't be related to Hadop release "under
stabilization". I believe it has been agreed somewhere else that our trunk
remains 'open' so we can add new feature, etc. For releases of Hadoop stack we
are using branches.
Cos
> Regarding 2/, we should probably do a last release before moving to
> Hadoop 0.23.X (probably X =1 or 2) and use that branch for future
> versions of Hadoop 0.20.20X as stable branch.
Re: [VOTE] Bigtop 0.3.0: target release date, supported platforms,
bill of materials
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 03:28PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 02:37PM, Bruno MahИ wrote:
> > On 11/22/2011 02:24 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > > Please vote on the proposed content for 0.3.0 release. The vote will
> > > close on Sunday 11/27/11 11:59pm PST. Please limit this thread to
> > > +1/-1 (with explanation).
> > >
> > > Release date:
> > > * Mid-end Jan 2012
> > >
> > > Supported platforms (no change from 0.2.0):
> > > * CentOS 6
> > > * Ubuntu LTS Lucid 10.04
> > > * OpenSUSE 11.4
> > > * Fedora 15
> > >
> > > Proposed bill of materials:
> > > * HCatalog 0.2.0 (new, must have)
> > > * Sqoop 1.4 (new, best effort)
> > > * Zookeeper 3.4 (upgrade, must have)
> > > * Hadoop 0.20.205.1 (upgrade, must have)
> > > * HBase 0.92 (upgrade, must have)
> > > * Oozie 3.1.2 (upgrade, best effort)
> > > * Whirr 0.6.0 (upgrade, best effort)
> > > * Hive 0.8.0 (upgrade, best effort)
> > > * Pig 0.9.1
> > > * Mahout 0.5
> > > * Flume 0.9.3
> >
> > -1
> >
> > 1/ Latest openSUSE and Fedora are respectively 12.1 and 16
> > 2/ We should move trunk to Apache Hadoop 0.23 before January. By then a
> > few projects should have fixed their compatibility issue with Apache
> > Hadoop enabling us to push for a release with more than just Hadoop 0.23.
> > 3/ I thought we would base releases based on a ~ quaterly schedule and
> > not features.
>
> -1 on the Bruno: our trunk shouldn't be related to Hadop release "under
It was "-1 on that, Bruno" ;) Sorry
> stabilization". I believe it has been agreed somewhere else that our trunk
> remains 'open' so we can add new feature, etc. For releases of Hadoop stack we
> are using branches.
>
> Cos
>
> > Regarding 2/, we should probably do a last release before moving to
> > Hadoop 0.23.X (probably X =1 or 2) and use that branch for future
> > versions of Hadoop 0.20.20X as stable branch.