You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ode.apache.org by Greg Lucas <gr...@gmail.com> on 2009/10/30 15:04:09 UTC
ode 1.x with newer buildr?
I'm curious why ODE 1.3.x can only be built with buildr 1.2.10 - would
there be significant changes to the rakefile to get it building with a
newer buildr release?
--
Greg Lucas
Re: ode 1.x with newer buildr?
Posted by Greg Lucas <gr...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me of course. Thanks Alexis!
~Greg
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:33:03 -0500, Alexis Midon <mi...@intalio.com> wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> no changes are really minimum. I think the main reason not to upgrade
> was to
> not impact user's environments. But obviously now, using an old version
> of
> Buildr hurts.
> If there's no objection, I'll upgrade the Rakefile to use Buildr 1.3.5.
>
> Alexis
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Greg Lucas <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm curious why ODE 1.3.x can only be built with buildr 1.2.10 - would
>> there be significant changes to the rakefile to get it building with a
>> newer
>> buildr release?
Re: ode 1.x with newer buildr?
Posted by Alexis Midon <mi...@intalio.com>.
Hi Greg,
no changes are really minimum. I think the main reason not to upgrade was to
not impact user's environments. But obviously now, using an old version of
Buildr hurts.
If there's no objection, I'll upgrade the Rakefile to use Buildr 1.3.5.
Alexis
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Greg Lucas <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm curious why ODE 1.3.x can only be built with buildr 1.2.10 - would
> there be significant changes to the rakefile to get it building with a newer
> buildr release?
>
> --
> Greg Lucas
>