RE: New Sitemap Treeprocessor for 2.2 [Instrumentation / JMX Now]

[Corin Moss <Co...@tvnz.co.nz>]

Ahh, ok, it seems that I missed the JMX thread:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=107841567600003&r=1&w=2

I've been using Instrumentation quite successfully for a couple of
weeks, it was how I managed to pick up a bug in the CIncludeTransformer,
and it's helped hugely in some fairly complex pool debugging that we're
doing now.  I see that a few people have offered to implement JMX - is
there any progress on this? I'd love to help.


-----Original Message-----
From: Gianugo Rabellino [mailto:gianugo@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, 21 March 2004 6:16 a.m.
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Sitemap Treeprocessor for 2.2


Ralph Goers wrote:

> I'm also interested in Cocoon management and monitoring. But rather
> than using the Excalibur instrumentation I would like to suggest that
> JMX MBeans be used instead, since that is really what the management
> tools want these days.
>

Big +1, JMX is indeed the way today.

--
Gianugo Rabellino
Pro-netics s.r.l. -  http://www.pro-netics.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
     (Blogging at: http://www.rabellino.it/blog/)

================================================================
CAUTION: This e-mail and any attachment(s) contains information
that is intended to be read only by the named recipient(s). It
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary or the
subject of legal privilege. This information is not to be used by
any other person and/or organisation. If you are not the intended
recipient, please advise us immediately and delete this e-mail
from your system. Do not use any information contained in it.

================================================================
For more information on the Television New Zealand Group, visit
us online at http://www.tvnz.co.nz
================================================================