You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Adrien Grand (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/02/10 19:02:12 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-6227) Add BooleanClause.Occur.FILTER
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-6227.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> Add BooleanClause.Occur.FILTER
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6227
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6227
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Assignee: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Trunk, 5.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-6227.patch, LUCENE-6227.patch, LUCENE-6227.patch, LUCENE-6227.patch, LUCENE-6227.patch
>
>
> Now that we have weight-level control of whether scoring is needed or not, we could add a new clause type to BooleanQuery. It would behave like MUST exept that it would not participate in scoring.
> Why do we need it given that we already have FilteredQuery? The idea is that by having a single query that performs conjunctions, we could potentially take better decisions. It's not ready to replace FilteredQuery yet as FilteredQuery has handling of random-access filters that BooleanQuery doesn't, but it's a first step towards that direction and eventually FilteredQuery would just rewrite to a BooleanQuery.
> I've been calling this new clause type FILTER so far, but feel free to propose a better name.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org