You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by ji...@apache.org on 2007/02/15 16:13:18 UTC
svn commit: r507955 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Author: jim
Date: Thu Feb 15 07:13:17 2007
New Revision: 507955
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=507955
Log:
Actually, I consider this a show-stopper, since the current
behavior is broke broke broke
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS?view=diff&rev=507955&r1=507954&r2=507955
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Thu Feb 15 07:13:17 2007
@@ -110,6 +110,12 @@
RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
+ * mod_proxy: ProxyTimeout (and others) ignored due to not merging
+ the *_set params.
+ PR# 11540
+ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=507516
+ (Note: includes some not applicable to 2.0.x)
+ +1: jim
PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
[ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
Re: AW: svn commit: r507955 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Posted by Stuart Children <st...@terminus.co.uk>.
Plüm wrote:
> It applies to 2.2.x, but this is about 2.0.x where the trunk version does
> NOT work cleanly.
Ah, whoops - I didn't notice this thread was 2.0 and the other 2.2. My
mistake. Indeed, 2.2.x and trunk have an additional configuration
directive over 2.0.x (proxy_status) which is what's getting in the way.
Here's a patch for current 2.0.x:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19606
Thanks
--
Stuart Children
http://terminus.co.uk/
AW: svn commit: r507955 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Posted by Plüm,
Rüdiger,
VF EITO <ru...@vodafone.com>.
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Stuart Children
> Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Februar 2007 12:40
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r507955 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
>
>
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > -1 as is, Jim would you -please- post the actual patch you
> are asking
> > us to vote on :-? (veto removal automatic upon availability of the
> > link to the specific patch you plan to commit that actually applies,
> > and probably my review pretty quickly, too.)
>
> Trunk patch should apply with offset, but to help things
> along here's a
It applies to 2.2.x, but this is about 2.0.x where the trunk version does
NOT work cleanly.
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: svn commit: r507955 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Posted by Stuart Children <st...@terminus.co.uk>.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> -1 as is, Jim would you -please- post the actual patch you are asking
> us to vote on :-? (veto removal automatic upon availability of the
> link to the specific patch you plan to commit that actually applies,
> and probably my review pretty quickly, too.)
Trunk patch should apply with offset, but to help things along here's a
freshly generated patch against current 2.2.x HEAD (and attached to bug):
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19602
Obviously Jim has to confirm that's what he intends to apply.
Thanks for the movement on this!
--
Stuart Children
http://terminus.co.uk/
Re: svn commit: r507955 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
jim@apache.org wrote:
>
> RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
>
> + * mod_proxy: ProxyTimeout (and others) ignored due to not merging
> + the *_set params.
> + PR# 11540
> + http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=507516
> + (Note: includes some not applicable to 2.0.x)
> + +1: jim
-1 as is, Jim would you -please- post the actual patch you are asking
us to vote on :-? (veto removal automatic upon availability of the
link to the specific patch you plan to commit that actually applies,
and probably my review pretty quickly, too.)