You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by st...@apache.org on 2015/03/16 19:00:30 UTC
svn commit: r1667090 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c
Author: stefan2
Date: Mon Mar 16 18:00:30 2015
New Revision: 1667090
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1667090
Log:
* subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c
(fs_node_relation): Clarify comment. No functional change.
Suggested by: julianfoad
Modified:
subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c
Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c?rev=1667090&r1=1667089&r2=1667090&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c (original)
+++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c Mon Mar 16 18:00:30 2015
@@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ fs_node_relation(svn_fs_node_relation_t
/* Noderevs have the same node-ID now. So, they *seem* to be related.
*
* Special case: Different txns may create the same (txn-local) node ID.
- * Only when they are committed can they actually be related to others. */
+ * These are not related to each other, nor to any other node ID so far. */
if (different_txn && node_id_a.revision == SVN_INVALID_REVNUM)
{
*relation = svn_fs_node_unrelated;