You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by "Robin Anil (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/01/05 03:24:54 UTC

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-233) Modifying Mahout Check style to match our current coding style

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796489#action_12796489 ] 

Robin Anil commented on MAHOUT-233:
-----------------------------------

Do these checkstyle and Eclipse formatters look OK for Mahout wide consumption ?

> Modifying Mahout Check style to match our current coding style
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAHOUT-233
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-233
>             Project: Mahout
>          Issue Type: Task
>    Affects Versions: 0.3
>            Reporter: Robin Anil
>             Fix For: 0.3
>
>         Attachments: checkstyle-xml.patch, Eclipse-Codestyle.diff, Eclipse-Mahout-Codestyle.xml
>
>
> Checkstyle currently throws a lot of errors for small things like 
> private static Logger log 
> if(booleanVar == false) // Required for readability 
> This task is created to track 
> how to match the checkstyle to relax certain rules and 
> changes in code for the strict ones

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.