You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by "Robin Anil (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/01/05 03:24:54 UTC
[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-233) Modifying Mahout Check style to
match our current coding style
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796489#action_12796489 ]
Robin Anil commented on MAHOUT-233:
-----------------------------------
Do these checkstyle and Eclipse formatters look OK for Mahout wide consumption ?
> Modifying Mahout Check style to match our current coding style
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAHOUT-233
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-233
> Project: Mahout
> Issue Type: Task
> Affects Versions: 0.3
> Reporter: Robin Anil
> Fix For: 0.3
>
> Attachments: checkstyle-xml.patch, Eclipse-Codestyle.diff, Eclipse-Mahout-Codestyle.xml
>
>
> Checkstyle currently throws a lot of errors for small things like
> private static Logger log
> if(booleanVar == false) // Required for readability
> This task is created to track
> how to match the checkstyle to relax certain rules and
> changes in code for the strict ones
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.