You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2010/04/18 07:14:47 UTC
[VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.4?
I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate here:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-1/
Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
In includes some critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
CHANGES.txt or http://su.pr/4QEGFv for the list of over 100 issues
addressed by this candidate).
Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
Sunday, the 24th of April.
Yours,
The HBase Team
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
>> You mean this page:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-1/hbase-0.20.4/docs/
>>
>> What is missing?
>
> Well the page has 4 items, on the left I see 9 items. Originally those
> two were kept in sync.
>
Oh, you are saying that the navbar and the index page should have same
number of items? That what is in the navbar should be here in the
main index page for the doc?
I don't think those were ever in sync; e.g. we didn't have link to
overview and mailing lists in main page.
Hope you don't mind that I go ahead an roll an RC2, given that the
javadoc and Ryans' 2248 bug have been fixed, while you are sleeping
in your Lucerne bed.......
St.Ack
>
>>
>> File an issue.
>>
>> I don't think a doc issue enough to sink the RC but if we cut a new
>> one, we can update this.
>
> Yep
>
>>
>> St.Ack
>>
>>
>>> J-D
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>> I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate here:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-1/
>>>>
>>>> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>>>>
>>>> In includes some critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
>>>> CHANGES.txt or http://su.pr/4QEGFv for the list of over 100 issues
>>>> addressed by this candidate).
>>>>
>>>> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
>>>> Sunday, the 24th of April.
>>>>
>>>> Yours,
>>>> The HBase Team
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
> You mean this page:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-1/hbase-0.20.4/docs/
>
> What is missing?
Well the page has 4 items, on the left I see 9 items. Originally those
two were kept in sync.
>
> File an issue.
>
> I don't think a doc issue enough to sink the RC but if we cut a new
> one, we can update this.
Yep
>
> St.Ack
>
>
>> J-D
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>> I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-1/
>>>
>>> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>>>
>>> In includes some critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
>>> CHANGES.txt or http://su.pr/4QEGFv for the list of over 100 issues
>>> addressed by this candidate).
>>>
>>> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
>>> Sunday, the 24th of April.
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>> The HBase Team
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
> My testing shows it's good (did some extreme PEs and ran unit tests),
> although I have some nits WRT documentation.
>
> - The doc index.html page isn't listing all the new pages that are on
> the left, it looks weird.
You mean this page:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-1/hbase-0.20.4/docs/
What is missing?
> - The client package and HTable javadoc are outdated/slightly wrt row
> locks since 2248. Here's what Ryan told me after discussing with him:
>
> I dislike the term "respect row lock" its the wrong model here
> Only puts, deletes, check and put, and icv take out row locks now
> Gets and scans will return data as fresh and possibly fresher than
> when they began and neither will ever return half written data
>
File an issue.
I don't think a doc issue enough to sink the RC but if we cut a new
one, we can update this.
St.Ack
> J-D
>
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-1/
>>
>> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>>
>> In includes some critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
>> CHANGES.txt or http://su.pr/4QEGFv for the list of over 100 issues
>> addressed by this candidate).
>>
>> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
>> Sunday, the 24th of April.
>>
>> Yours,
>> The HBase Team
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>.
My testing shows it's good (did some extreme PEs and ran unit tests),
although I have some nits WRT documentation.
- The doc index.html page isn't listing all the new pages that are on
the left, it looks weird.
- The client package and HTable javadoc are outdated/slightly wrt row
locks since 2248. Here's what Ryan told me after discussing with him:
I dislike the term "respect row lock" its the wrong model here
Only puts, deletes, check and put, and icv take out row locks now
Gets and scans will return data as fresh and possibly fresher than
when they began and neither will ever return half written data
J-D
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-1/
>
> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>
> In includes some critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
> CHANGES.txt or http://su.pr/4QEGFv for the list of over 100 issues
> addressed by this candidate).
>
> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
> Sunday, the 24th of April.
>
> Yours,
> The HBase Team
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com>.
Ok I fixed the javadoc in both branches.
-ryan
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nick said he had rewritten the javadoc for a post 2248 world... but i
> havent seen him online.
>
> i can do a quick fix
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Stack <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Do you want to make a quick javadoc fix for scan and locks?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 20, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok 2474 is committed to both 0.20 and 0.20_pre_durability
>>>
>>> I still havent quite ported 2248 to trunk yet, it isnt that simple
>>> because it depends on a few other patches which I need to check. Once
>>> we have 0.20.4 released I'll work on it more.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> HBASE-2421, 2424 are multiput fixes. Multiput is not in
>>>> 0.20_pre_durability. The others I'd like to do unit tests for first
>>>> and IMO, they are ugly but not blockers.
>>>>
>>>> I'd suggest that as soon as Ryan has a fix for 2474, we roll a new RC.
>>>> J-D, you have a euro-fix for the doc issue?
>>>>
>>>> St.Ack
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, the RC is sunk.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's make sure there is a unit test for whatever the issue found is.
>>>>> The suite otherwise didn't catch it and neither did PE, at least not an
>>>>> obvious failure.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey Stack, anything else that is worth pulling into the next RC in
>>>>> addition to the doc updates suggested by J-D? For example HBASE-2421,
>>>>> HBASE-2424, HBASE-2441, HBASE-2443?
>>>>>
>>>>> - Andy
>>>>>
>>>>> --- On Tue, 4/20/10, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No JIRA yet but like -1 to the max.
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Todd found a bug and I sent him a candidate fix. We need to improve
>>>>>> the unit tests because they d...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com>.
Nick said he had rewritten the javadoc for a post 2248 world... but i
havent seen him online.
i can do a quick fix
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Stack <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you want to make a quick javadoc fix for scan and locks?
>
>
>
> On Apr 20, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok 2474 is committed to both 0.20 and 0.20_pre_durability
>>
>> I still havent quite ported 2248 to trunk yet, it isnt that simple
>> because it depends on a few other patches which I need to check. Once
>> we have 0.20.4 released I'll work on it more.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> HBASE-2421, 2424 are multiput fixes. Multiput is not in
>>> 0.20_pre_durability. The others I'd like to do unit tests for first
>>> and IMO, they are ugly but not blockers.
>>>
>>> I'd suggest that as soon as Ryan has a fix for 2474, we roll a new RC.
>>> J-D, you have a euro-fix for the doc issue?
>>>
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ok, the RC is sunk.
>>>>
>>>> Let's make sure there is a unit test for whatever the issue found is.
>>>> The suite otherwise didn't catch it and neither did PE, at least not an
>>>> obvious failure.
>>>>
>>>> Hey Stack, anything else that is worth pulling into the next RC in
>>>> addition to the doc updates suggested by J-D? For example HBASE-2421,
>>>> HBASE-2424, HBASE-2441, HBASE-2443?
>>>>
>>>> - Andy
>>>>
>>>> --- On Tue, 4/20/10, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> No JIRA yet but like -1 to the max.
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> Todd found a bug and I sent him a candidate fix. We need to improve
>>>>> the unit tests because they d...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Stack <sa...@gmail.com>.
Do you want to make a quick javadoc fix for scan and locks?
On Apr 20, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok 2474 is committed to both 0.20 and 0.20_pre_durability
>
> I still havent quite ported 2248 to trunk yet, it isnt that simple
> because it depends on a few other patches which I need to check. Once
> we have 0.20.4 released I'll work on it more.
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> HBASE-2421, 2424 are multiput fixes. Multiput is not in
>> 0.20_pre_durability. The others I'd like to do unit tests for first
>> and IMO, they are ugly but not blockers.
>>
>> I'd suggest that as soon as Ryan has a fix for 2474, we roll a new
>> RC.
>> J-D, you have a euro-fix for the doc issue?
>>
>> St.Ack
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell
>> <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Ok, the RC is sunk.
>>>
>>> Let's make sure there is a unit test for whatever the issue found
>>> is. The suite otherwise didn't catch it and neither did PE, at
>>> least not an obvious failure.
>>>
>>> Hey Stack, anything else that is worth pulling into the next RC in
>>> addition to the doc updates suggested by J-D? For example
>>> HBASE-2421, HBASE-2424, HBASE-2441, HBASE-2443?
>>>
>>> - Andy
>>>
>>> --- On Tue, 4/20/10, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> No JIRA yet but like -1 to the max.
>>> [...]
>>>> Todd found a bug and I sent him a candidate fix. We need to improve
>>>> the unit tests because they d...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com>.
Ok 2474 is committed to both 0.20 and 0.20_pre_durability
I still havent quite ported 2248 to trunk yet, it isnt that simple
because it depends on a few other patches which I need to check. Once
we have 0.20.4 released I'll work on it more.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> HBASE-2421, 2424 are multiput fixes. Multiput is not in
> 0.20_pre_durability. The others I'd like to do unit tests for first
> and IMO, they are ugly but not blockers.
>
> I'd suggest that as soon as Ryan has a fix for 2474, we roll a new RC.
> J-D, you have a euro-fix for the doc issue?
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Ok, the RC is sunk.
>>
>> Let's make sure there is a unit test for whatever the issue found is. The suite otherwise didn't catch it and neither did PE, at least not an obvious failure.
>>
>> Hey Stack, anything else that is worth pulling into the next RC in addition to the doc updates suggested by J-D? For example HBASE-2421, HBASE-2424, HBASE-2441, HBASE-2443?
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> --- On Tue, 4/20/10, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> No JIRA yet but like -1 to the max.
>> [...]
>>> Todd found a bug and I sent him a candidate fix. We need to improve
>>> the unit tests because they d...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
HBASE-2421, 2424 are multiput fixes. Multiput is not in
0.20_pre_durability. The others I'd like to do unit tests for first
and IMO, they are ugly but not blockers.
I'd suggest that as soon as Ryan has a fix for 2474, we roll a new RC.
J-D, you have a euro-fix for the doc issue?
St.Ack
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ok, the RC is sunk.
>
> Let's make sure there is a unit test for whatever the issue found is. The suite otherwise didn't catch it and neither did PE, at least not an obvious failure.
>
> Hey Stack, anything else that is worth pulling into the next RC in addition to the doc updates suggested by J-D? For example HBASE-2421, HBASE-2424, HBASE-2441, HBASE-2443?
>
> - Andy
>
> --- On Tue, 4/20/10, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> No JIRA yet but like -1 to the max.
> [...]
>> Todd found a bug and I sent him a candidate fix. We need to improve
>> the unit tests because they d...
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
That explains why PE was useless also in this case.
> Here is the JIRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2474
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com>.
Here is the JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2474
I think a trivial fix to the existing unit tests can cover this case,
since they are validating the return count, but not the contents.
Just add in a bit of content validation and we should be good.
-ryan
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Ok, the RC is sunk.
>>
>> Let's make sure there is a unit test for whatever the issue found is. The
>> suite otherwise didn't catch it and neither did PE, at least not an obvious
>> failure.
>>
>
> Yep, I sent Ryan a functional test which he's now posted to the JIRA - it
> doesn't currently run against a minicluster but it should be trivial. (built
> the test as part of the suite I'm doing for testing all of our acid
> guarantees)
>
>
>>
>> Hey Stack, anything else that is worth pulling into the next RC in addition
>> to the doc updates suggested by J-D? For example HBASE-2421, HBASE-2424,
>> HBASE-2441, HBASE-2443?
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> --- On Tue, 4/20/10, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > No JIRA yet but like -1 to the max.
>> [...]
>> > Todd found a bug and I sent him a candidate fix. We need to improve
>> > the unit tests because they d...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ok, the RC is sunk.
>
> Let's make sure there is a unit test for whatever the issue found is. The
> suite otherwise didn't catch it and neither did PE, at least not an obvious
> failure.
>
Yep, I sent Ryan a functional test which he's now posted to the JIRA - it
doesn't currently run against a minicluster but it should be trivial. (built
the test as part of the suite I'm doing for testing all of our acid
guarantees)
>
> Hey Stack, anything else that is worth pulling into the next RC in addition
> to the doc updates suggested by J-D? For example HBASE-2421, HBASE-2424,
> HBASE-2441, HBASE-2443?
>
> - Andy
>
> --- On Tue, 4/20/10, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > No JIRA yet but like -1 to the max.
> [...]
> > Todd found a bug and I sent him a candidate fix. We need to improve
> > the unit tests because they d...
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Ok, the RC is sunk.
Let's make sure there is a unit test for whatever the issue found is. The suite otherwise didn't catch it and neither did PE, at least not an obvious failure.
Hey Stack, anything else that is worth pulling into the next RC in addition to the doc updates suggested by J-D? For example HBASE-2421, HBASE-2424, HBASE-2441, HBASE-2443?
- Andy
--- On Tue, 4/20/10, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No JIRA yet but like -1 to the max.
[...]
> Todd found a bug and I sent him a candidate fix. We need to improve
> the unit tests because they d...
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com>.
No JIRA yet but like -1 to the max.
On Apr 20, 2010 8:54 AM, "Stack" <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This rc cannot be officia...
Is that a +1 or -1 from you? What is the RC-sinking issue that you
are referring to?
St.Ack
Todd found a bug and I sent him a
> candidate fix. We need to improve the unit tests because they d...
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This rc cannot be official...
Is that a +1 or -1 from you? What is the RC-sinking issue that you
are referring to?
St.Ack
Todd found a bug and I sent him a
> candidate fix. We need to improve the unit tests because they did not
> find this but they should have.
>
> On Tuesday, April 20, 2010, Amandeep Khurana <am...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've deployed it on 2 clusters and done imports and scans on the tables.
>> Working good till now.
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> Amandeep Khurana
>> Computer Science Graduate Student
>> University of California, Santa Cruz
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-1/
>>>
>>> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>>>
>>> In includes some critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
>>> CHANGES.txt or http://su.pr/4QEGFv for the list of over 100 issues
>>> addressed by this candidate).
>>>
>>> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
>>> Sunday, the 24th of April.
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>> The HBase Team
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com>.
This rc cannot be official... Todd found a bug and I sent him a
candidate fix. We need to improve the unit tests because they did not
find this but they should have.
On Tuesday, April 20, 2010, Amandeep Khurana <am...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've deployed it on 2 clusters and done imports and scans on the tables.
> Working good till now.
>
> +1
>
>
> Amandeep Khurana
> Computer Science Graduate Student
> University of California, Santa Cruz
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-1/
>>
>> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>>
>> In includes some critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
>> CHANGES.txt or http://su.pr/4QEGFv for the list of over 100 issues
>> addressed by this candidate).
>>
>> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
>> Sunday, the 24th of April.
>>
>> Yours,
>> The HBase Team
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Amandeep Khurana <am...@gmail.com>.
I've deployed it on 2 clusters and done imports and scans on the tables.
Working good till now.
+1
Amandeep Khurana
Computer Science Graduate Student
University of California, Santa Cruz
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-1/
>
> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4?
>
> In includes some critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See
> CHANGES.txt or http://su.pr/4QEGFv for the list of over 100 issues
> addressed by this candidate).
>
> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
> Sunday, the 24th of April.
>
> Yours,
> The HBase Team
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 as hbase-0.20.4?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@yahoo.com>.
+1
It made it through a complete benchmark set up on EC2.
- Andy