You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> on 2006/04/06 15:01:29 UTC
[Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Please cast your votes for releasing the current svn as 2.1.9 tomorrow.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jb...@apache.org>.
* Bertrand Delacretaz:
> Le 6 avr. 06 à 15:15, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
>
> >..-0 as I wasn't able to test this release at all - so I want to release
> >only if I get enough positive responses from others!..
>
> Same here - I meant to run tests this week but didn't find time. "Maybe tomorrow" ,-)
>
> So -0 from me as well.
Hello Bertrand,
I'm running « ./build.sh htmlunit-tests » and there is an error:
Testcase: testXslTalTestDoc took 1,217 sec
FAILED
/html/body/p[1] expected:<First paragraph of the test document.> but was:<>
junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: /html/body/p[1] expected:<First paragraph of the test document.> but was:<>
at org.apache.cocoon.HtmlUnitTestCase.assertXPath(HtmlUnitTestCase.java:251)
at org.apache.cocoon.XslTalTestCase.testXslTalTestDoc(XslTalTestCase.java:36)
Test org.apache.cocoon.XslTalTestCase FAILED
htmlunit-notes:
*** Htmlunit tests notes ***
a) To run these tests, an instance of Cocoon must be
running at http://localhost:8888/ (start it as usual, from another window)
b) JDK 1.4.x is required to run these tests, but running them
under 1.4.x to test Cocoon running under 1.3.x should be ok.
c) Settings in build.properties can allow a subset of tests to run,
see the htmlunit section there.
htmlunit-tests-report:
Created dir: /usr/local-home/jbq/var/repos/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/build/cocoon/test/htmlunit/report
Transform time: 4598ms
Unit report is at build/cocoon/test/htmlunit/report/index.html
BUILD FAILED
/usr/local-home/jbq/var/repos/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/tools/targets/test-build.xml:184: One or more HtmlUnit tests failed or caused errors. Please have a look into the report for details.
Total time: 1 minute 9 seconds
Any idea?
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Le 6 avr. 06 à 15:15, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
> ..-0 as I wasn't able to test this release at all - so I want to
> release
> only if I get enough positive responses from others!..
Same here - I meant to run tests this week but didn't find time.
"Maybe tomorrow" ,-)
So -0 from me as well.
-Bertrand
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Carsten Ziegeler schrieb:
> Please cast your votes for releasing the current svn as 2.1.9 tomorrow.
>
-0 as I wasn't able to test this release at all - so I want to release
only if I get enough positive responses from others!
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Giacomo Pati <gi...@apache.org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 08:13:15 +0200
> From: Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>
> Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
>
> Ok, so far we have
> - three binding +1's from Ralph, Joerg and Antonio
> - one non-binding +1 from Erron
> - two -0 from Bertrand and myself
>
> I'm sorry but this is currently not convincing me. What about all the
> other committers?
I coudn't test the hole beast. I've have no issues with some little
projects I've migrated to it. So I can at least give a
+0
- --
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEN3ygLNdJvZjjVZARAnxiAJ4nJ6f4dXeOoSU3pvyTBIzGHA+8oACffeD+
TFe3JO7O5XuUCu9Zx0bjJHo=
=0xnT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Le 7 avr. 06 à 10:09, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
> Ok, although the participation in this vote is disappointingly low,
> I'll
> do the release today, anyway.
Agreed on both points ;-)
> If problems occur, we can build a 2.1.9.1 easiliy.
I won't have time to look at the mentioned xsltal problem before next
week, but it doesn't affect core anyway.
-Bertrand
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Ok, although the participation in this vote is disappointingly low, I'll
do the release today, anyway.
If problems occur, we can build a 2.1.9.1 easiliy.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by hepabolu <he...@gmail.com>.
Carsten Ziegeler said the following on 07-04-2006 08:13:
> Ok, so far we have
> - three binding +1's from Ralph, Joerg and Antonio
> - one non-binding +1 from Erron
> - two -0 from Bertrand and myself
>
> I'm sorry but this is currently not convincing me. What about all the
> other committers?
I haven't been able to test 2.1.9, but I'm running my website on a 2.1.9
-dev snapshot for some time (sorry, forgot which one, some time fairly
soon after Sylvain's commit of the Dojo stuff). It seems all runs fairly
smoothly.
I've planned to upgrade the website to 2.1.9 some time after the
release, but if it really helps, I'm willing to do it in the next few days.
Bye, Helma
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Ok, so far we have
- three binding +1's from Ralph, Joerg and Antonio
- one non-binding +1 from Erron
- two -0 from Bertrand and myself
I'm sorry but this is currently not convincing me. What about all the
other committers?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
Carsten Ziegeler escribió:
> Please cast your votes for releasing the current svn as 2.1.9 tomorrow.
>
> Carsten
>
+1. I've been working with the 2.1.x branch since 31-mar. So far,
everything looks quite stable. I had not time to test the samples, which
are really important for people evaluating cocoon.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Sylvain Wallez <sy...@apache.org>.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Please cast your votes for releasing the current svn as 2.1.9 tomorrow.
>
A late +0 (did not had time to test)
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez
http://bluxte.net
Apache Software Foundation Member
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jb...@apache.org>.
* Simone Gianni:
> They run correctly for 90.00%, there have been 4 errors and 1
> failure on 50 tests. 2 errors in CachingPipelineTestCase
Also make sure you have not excluded the test-suite from
build.properties:
#exclude.webapp.test-suite=true
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jb...@apache.org>.
* Simone Gianni:
> They run correctly for 90.00%, there have been 4 errors and 1 failure
> on 50 tests. 2 errors in CachingPipelineTestCase
I've got:
Running org.apache.cocoon.CachingPipelineTestCase
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 3,276 sec
Testsuite: org.apache.cocoon.CachingPipelineTestCase
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 3,276 sec
Testcase: testCachingProcessingPipeline took 1,937 sec
Testcase: testCachingPointProcessingPipeline took 1,172 sec
Could you please file the relevant log information for
CachingPipelineTestCase? Are you sure you have the latest and
greatest in branch 2.1?
The fix to pipeline caching is documented in status.xml:
<action dev="JBQ" type="fix" fixes-bug="COCOON-1279">
Fix caching-point pipelines. Remove the undocumented smart-caching parameter.
</action>
TIA,
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Simone Gianni <s....@thebug.it>.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>Please cast your votes for releasing the current svn as 2.1.9 tomorrow.
>
>Carsten
>
>
Sorry for the delay.
I've been using 2.1.X constantly, didn't stopped at 2.1.8, and forms,
javaflow, and other core elements i've been using (xsl transformer,
available selector, directory generator, resource generator, just to
name a few) are working correctly.
Anyway I'm trying to run tests, i downloaded latest (1.8) htmlunit but
got a compiler error, so i downloaded 1.5 (IMMO we should update).
They run correctly for 90.00%, there have been 4 errors and 1 failure on
50 tests. 2 errors in CachingPipelineTestCase
<ci...@thebug.it>, 1 error in
FormsSharingViewDataTestCase <ci...@thebug.it>, 1
error in RedirectTestCase <ci...@thebug.it> while
the failure was in XslTalTestCase
<ci...@thebug.it> : /html/body/p[1]
expected:<First paragraph of the test document.> but was:<> .
So, +1 for a 2.1.9, but be prepared for a 2.1.9.1 .
Simone
--
Simone Gianni
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Ralph Goers <Ra...@dslextreme.com>.
FWIW, Erron works with me and has been periodically testing the latest
SVN with our WebCenter product. We are in the process of working on a
new release of our product that requires 2.1.9. We are primarily using
the Portal and a lot of the core components.
Erron Austin wrote:
> I've run into no show stoppers.
>
> +1
>
>
> On 4/6/06, *Ralph Goers* <Ralph.Goers@dslextreme.com
> <ma...@dslextreme.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Please cast your votes for releasing the current svn as 2.1.9
> tomorrow.
> >
> > Carsten
> >
> +1
>
> Ralph
>
>
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Erron Austin <er...@gmail.com>.
I've run into no show stoppers.
+1
On 4/6/06, Ralph Goers <Ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Please cast your votes for releasing the current svn as 2.1.9 tomorrow.
> >
> > Carsten
> >
> +1
>
> Ralph
>
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Ralph Goers <Ra...@dslextreme.com>.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Please cast your votes for releasing the current svn as 2.1.9 tomorrow.
>
> Carsten
>
+1
Ralph
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Joerg Heinicke <jo...@gmx.de>.
On 06.04.2006 15:01, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Please cast your votes for releasing the current svn as 2.1.9 tomorrow.
+1 relying on Ralph's and Erron's evaluation.
Jörg
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by David Crossley <cr...@apache.org>.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Please cast your votes for releasing the current svn as 2.1.9 tomorrow.
+1 from me.
I didn't do any unit tests, but did satisfy myself
about some other things and checked some random samples.
-David
Re: [Vote] Release 2.1.9 tomorrow
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jb...@apache.org>.
* Carsten Ziegeler:
> Please cast your votes for releasing the current svn as 2.1.9
> tomorrow.
+1
I use it on a regular basis.
However after migrating to the Dojo stuff, I run sometimes into
trouble with HTMLArea. Has someone noticed that as well?
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/