You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by di...@covalent.net on 2002/04/24 19:13:59 UTC

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/support ab.c

Aaron,

Could you also ++i the version number ? I.e. in the past we changed the
VERSION string each time we made a change which made results of that
version of AB incomparable with previous ones. See comments in the header
of apache-1.3/src/support/ab.c.

Given that your change does that - might be proper to do so.

Dw

-- 
Dirk-Willem van Gulik

On 24 Apr 2002 aaron@apache.org wrote:

> aaron       02/04/24 10:09:59
>
>   Modified:    support  ab.c
>   Log:
>   Major improvement in concurrent processing for AB:
>   - Enable non-blocking connects.
>   - Prevent quasi-blocking mode apr_recv (which would prevent AB from
>     multiplexing over the entire descriptor set).
>   - Catch other fatal apr_recv() errors.
>
>   [This patch is slightly different than the one posted to the dev list,
>   but regardless thanks to the many people who reviewed this.]
>
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.96      +16 -7     httpd-2.0/support/ab.c
>
>   Index: ab.c
>   ===================================================================
>   RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/support/ab.c,v
>   retrieving revision 1.95
>   retrieving revision 1.96
>   diff -u -r1.95 -r1.96
>   --- ab.c	14 Apr 2002 09:21:43 -0000	1.95
>   +++ ab.c	24 Apr 2002 17:09:59 -0000	1.96
>   @@ -853,6 +853,10 @@
>    				SOCK_STREAM, c->ctx)) != APR_SUCCESS) {
>    	apr_err("socket", rv);
>        }
>   +    if ((rv = apr_setsocketopt(c->aprsock, APR_SO_NONBLOCK, 1))
>   +         != APR_SUCCESS) {
>   +        apr_err("socket nonblock", rv);
>   +    }
>        c->start = apr_time_now();
>        if ((rv = apr_connect(c->aprsock, destsa)) != APR_SUCCESS) {
>    	if (APR_STATUS_IS_EINPROGRESS(rv)) {
>   @@ -941,16 +945,21 @@
>        char respcode[4];		/* 3 digits and null */
>
>        r = sizeof(buffer);
>   -    apr_setsocketopt(c->aprsock, APR_SO_TIMEOUT, aprtimeout);
>        status = apr_recv(c->aprsock, buffer, &r);
>   -    if (r == 0 || (status != APR_SUCCESS && !APR_STATUS_IS_EAGAIN(status))) {
>   +    if (APR_STATUS_IS_EAGAIN(status))
>   +	return;
>   +    else if (r == 0 && APR_STATUS_IS_EOF(status)) {
>    	good++;
>    	close_connection(c);
>    	return;
>        }
>   -
>   -    if (APR_STATUS_IS_EAGAIN(status))
>   -	return;
>   +    /* catch legitimate fatal apr_recv errors */
>   +    else if (status != APR_SUCCESS) {
>   +        err_except++; /* XXX: is this the right error counter? */
>   +        /* XXX: Should errors here be fatal, or should we allow a
>   +         * certain number of them before completely failing? -aaron */
>   +        apr_err("apr_recv", status);
>   +    }
>
>        totalread += r;
>        if (c->read == 0) {
>   @@ -1302,14 +1311,14 @@
>    static void copyright(void)
>    {
>        if (!use_html) {
>   -	printf("This is ApacheBench, Version %s\n", AP_SERVER_BASEREVISION " <$Revision: 1.95 $> apache-2.0");
>   +	printf("This is ApacheBench, Version %s\n", AP_SERVER_BASEREVISION " <$Revision: 1.96 $> apache-2.0");
>    	printf("Copyright (c) 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/\n");
>    	printf("Copyright (c) 1998-2002 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/\n");
>    	printf("\n");
>        }
>        else {
>    	printf("<p>\n");
>   -	printf(" This is ApacheBench, Version %s <i>&lt;%s&gt;</i> apache-2.0<br>\n", AP_SERVER_BASEREVISION, "$Revision: 1.95 $");
>   +	printf(" This is ApacheBench, Version %s <i>&lt;%s&gt;</i> apache-2.0<br>\n", AP_SERVER_BASEREVISION, "$Revision: 1.96 $");
>    	printf(" Copyright (c) 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/<br>\n");
>    	printf(" Copyright (c) 1998-2002 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/<br>\n");
>    	printf("</p>\n<p>\n");
>
>
>
>


Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/support ab.c

Posted by di...@covalent.net.
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:

> Hmm..I don't see the VERSION symbol in the 2.0 version, and it looks
> like the comments in the header stop at Version 1.3e. I could start
> up at 2.0a, but would it be of much use to mention what has happened in
> the mean time? Also, I think we depend on the RCS Tags now for printing
> out the version string and whatnot.

*PLEASE* just add one; RCS tags may still be de different even though
results are comaprable (assuming settings are not changed). Feel free to
start as 2.0.a or something.


Dw


Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/support ab.c

Posted by Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 07:13:59PM +0200, dirkx@covalent.net wrote:
> 
> Aaron,
> 
> Could you also ++i the version number ? I.e. in the past we changed the
> VERSION string each time we made a change which made results of that
> version of AB incomparable with previous ones. See comments in the header
> of apache-1.3/src/support/ab.c.
> 
> Given that your change does that - might be proper to do so.

Hmm..I don't see the VERSION symbol in the 2.0 version, and it looks
like the comments in the header stop at Version 1.3e. I could start
up at 2.0a, but would it be of much use to mention what has happened in
the mean time? Also, I think we depend on the RCS Tags now for printing
out the version string and whatnot.

-aaron