Applying Patch Fixes to Guththila in 1.3.0

[Senaka Fernando <se...@wso2.com>]

Hi all,

I see that there are a number of issues, reported and patched when it
comes to the Guththila parser. Wouldn't it be better if we could add these
to the 1.3.0 release?

Regards,
Senaka

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org

RE: Applying Patch Fixes to Guththila in 1.3.0

[Bill Mitchell <bm...@austin.rr.com>]

While working on the axis2_libcurl code, I was frequently verifying the SOAP messages in memory on their way to the server, sometimes using the guththila parser and sometimes using libxml.  A new behavior I noticed was that one could enable an xml declaration at the front of the xml document using libxml.  But this new feature does not seem to work with guththila.  Initially I thought this was because the libxml is willing to default the version information when it is passed a character encoding but no version, whereas guththila xml writer treats this as an error.  But then I noticed that, beyond this, the guththila_xml_writer has no support at all for generating the xml declaration.  Which is understandable; after all, SOAP 1.1 says the xml declaration is not allowed in SOAP messages.  

 

Given that this ability to insert the xml declaration is claimed to be a feature of the new release, I take it that this is a bug in guththila that needs to be written up?  This might prevent the adoption of guththila as the default parser if it omits support needed for a feature in the new release.  

 

Bill Mitchell

wtmitchell3@acm.org

 

From: Dinesh Premalal [mailto:xydinesh@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 5:48 AM
To: Apache AXIS C Developers List; senaka@wso2.com
Subject: Re: Applying Patch Fixes to Guththila in 1.3.0

 

 

On Feb 4, 2008 4:16 PM, Senaka Fernando <se...@wso2.com> wrote:

Hi all,

I see that there are a number of issues, reported and patched when it
comes to the Guththila parser. Wouldn't it be better if we could add these
to the 1.3.0 release?


+1 , May be we can make guththila the default parser after fixing those.

thanks,
Dinesh


-- 
http://nethu.org/ 

Re: Applying Patch Fixes to Guththila in 1.3.0

[Dinesh Premalal <xy...@gmail.com>]

On Feb 4, 2008 4:16 PM, Senaka Fernando <se...@wso2.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I see that there are a number of issues, reported and patched when it
> comes to the Guththila parser. Wouldn't it be better if we could add these
> to the 1.3.0 release?


+1 , May be we can make guththila the default parser after fixing those.

thanks,
Dinesh


-- 
http://nethu.org/