You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to kerby@directory.apache.org by Kiran Ayyagari <ka...@apache.org> on 2015/07/01 10:58:13 UTC
principalName in KrbIdentity
Hi Kai,
In KrbIdentity is the PrincipalName.getName() will be equivalent to
the value of 'principalName' (I think so)
If yes, I would like to remove this additional field and change the
getPrincipalName() method to return principal.getName().
wdyt?
P.S:- I understand that these might have been overlooked while committing
the initial version, please consider my mails as honest questions.
(I am not nitpicking ;)
--
Kiran Ayyagari
http://keydap.com
RE: principalName in KrbIdentity
Posted by "Zheng, Kai" <ka...@intel.com>.
Hi Kiran,
I guess you would remove the following redundant field or method, right? It sounds good to me, thanks for the querying!
public class KrbIdentity {
private String principalName;
private PrincipalName principal;
...
public String getPrincipalName() {
return principalName;
}
public PrincipalName getPrincipal() {
return principal;
}
...
}
Regards,
Kai
-----Original Message-----
From: Kiran Ayyagari [mailto:kayyagari@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 4:58 PM
To: kerby@directory.apache.org
Subject: principalName in KrbIdentity
Hi Kai,
In KrbIdentity is the PrincipalName.getName() will be equivalent to
the value of 'principalName' (I think so)
If yes, I would like to remove this additional field and change the
getPrincipalName() method to return principal.getName().
wdyt?
P.S:- I understand that these might have been overlooked while committing
the initial version, please consider my mails as honest questions.
(I am not nitpicking ;)
--
Kiran Ayyagari
http://keydap.com